Search Climate Insights Directory

The Clean Air Task Force argues that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the technical and legal basis to mandate strict CO2 emission standards for power plants. The authors contend that carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is a 'demonstrated' technology, citing numerous Front End Engineering Design (FEED) studies for both natural gas-fired combined-cycle (NGCC) and coal plants. They suggest that the combination of Inflation Reduction Act incentives and strict Clean Air Act regulations is necessary to achieve significant emissions reductions.

The report argues that sanctions by the US, EU, and UK have been 'scattershot' and lack strategic coordination, failing to target the junta's primary revenue sources and arms networks. While legal authorizations are broad, the authors find that 67% of sanctions are unilateral, and critical entities like the Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE) remain largely unsanctioned by the US and UK. The brief recommends a harmonized strategy to cut off foreign currency, disrupt aviation fuel supplies, and comprehensively sanction all junta leadership members.

The report examines the South African cannabis industry, arguing that current legal and regulatory frameworks create high barriers to entry that exclude traditional growers and small enterprises. It identifies critical bottlenecks in medical cannabis exports, such as the lack of mutual recognition for SAHPRA licenses in European markets, and a lack of processing capacity for industrial hemp. The authors advocate for a tiered licensing system, the legalisation of a regulated adult-use market to support inclusive growth, and the establishment of a specialised state agency to coordinate the sector's development and ensure decent work and environmental sustainability.

The document argues that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an ineffective solution for Canada's oil and gas sector due to high costs, energy intensity, and a poor track record of delivery. It highlights that most Canadian CCS projects use captured carbon for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), which facilitates further oil production. Despite these failings, the Canadian government has provided billions in public funding, including a significant investment tax credit, which the authors suggest represents a high opportunity cost compared to more effective measures like methane reduction.

The policy brief argues that Canada requires a legal framework to ensure an orderly and equitable transition to a low-carbon economy. It recommends that federal legislation be based on International Labour Organization principles, guided by an independent advisory body, and supported by a network of just transition agencies in every province and territory, coordinated by a federal minister and institution.

The IAI Science Diplomacy Center (SDC) held its first advisory board meeting in November 2022 to establish a framework for strengthening the science-policy interface in the Americas. The board defined a vision focused on peaceful and sustainable regional development through transdisciplinary collaborations and set goals including the creation of a science diplomacy knowledge hub and regional training. Key recommendations include focusing on 'Climate Action' as a priority thematic area, leveraging the Science, Technology and Policy (STeP) Fellowship program to produce non-technical policy briefs, and developing a strategic communication plan to attract diverse funding from foundations and member Parties. The meeting also highlighted the need for contextualized training that includes scientists, diplomats, and journalists, and the establishment of a formal mentorship program to bridge the gap between early-career researchers and policy-makers.

The report highlights that methane emissions from coking coal mining add approximately 27% to the 20-year global warming impact of the steel industry. It argues that while the sector focuses on carbon capture (CCUS) and hydrogen, it ignores readily available technologies to reduce CMM. The document recommends that steelmakers only purchase coal from suppliers with net-zero compatible methane reduction plans and that policymakers include methane in carbon border adjustment mechanisms.

The briefing outlines six trends for financial institutions in 2023: the rise of short-term transition plans, political backlash against ESG investing, the growth of renewables over plateauing fossil fuels, the need for climate upskilling of employees, increased regulatory scrutiny on greenwashing, and the shift toward using transition-relevant data for portfolio steering.

The document explains the distinction between global warming and climate change, attributing current rapid warming to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and deforestation. It details the resulting increase in extreme weather events and highlights the disproportionate burden on marginalized communities and the Global South. The guide advocates for a transition to renewable energy, increased resource efficiency, and carbon removal to mitigate future disasters.

A coalition of human rights and environmental organizations is calling on the U.S. government to unambiguously reject the disproportionate use of force and arbitrary detentions by Peruvian security forces under President Dina Boluarte, arguing that vague statements are insufficient compared to the concerns expressed by the UN, EU, and other nations.

The article discusses the four main types of fluorinated gases—HFCs, PFCs, SF6, and NF3—which are potent greenhouse gases used in refrigeration and industrial manufacturing. It highlights the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol and the U.S. AIM Act as primary mechanisms for phasing down HFCs, while noting the need for sustainable alternatives like natural refrigerants and improved leak detection and destruction facilities.

The report finds that 40 financial institutions fund a combined methane footprint that could exceed 503 Mt CO2e. It highlights a significant gap between the climate commitments of the countries where these institutions are domiciled and the institutions' own internal policies, which are described as weak or non-existent regarding agri-methane.

The report examines the direct and indirect benefits of energy efficiency (EE), such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and increased industrial competitiveness. It details various international policy mechanisms—including regulation, market instruments, and fiscal policies—and evaluates their application in countries like Canada, China, and the EU. The document concludes that while Brazil has established several EE programs, it faces challenges such as fragmented governance and a lack of alignment between industrial and energy policies.

The report argues that current global economic responses to COVID-19, the war in Ukraine, and the climate crisis have been too focused on short-term stabilisation and stimulus rather than long-term structural reform. It highlights that only 18% of the USD 14.6tn allocated to COVID-19 recovery in 2020 was green spending, and that such investments have been concentrated in wealthier nations and focused primarily on decarbonisation. The authors advocate for a 'systems mind-set' that integrates circular economy principles, nature-based solutions, and just transition policies. Key recommendations include the use of debt-for-nature swaps, increased multilateral funding for the Global South, and the implementation of a 'Green Structural Recovery Menu' featuring fiscal reforms and the phasing out of fossil fuel subsidies.

The report examines the trend of incorporating GRP and IRC provisions into regional trade agreements (RTAs), with a detailed analysis of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA). It highlights how the USMCA differs from other agreements like the CPTPP and CETA by making GRP provisions binding, prescriptive, and wide-ranging. The document specifically explores the USMCA's approach to stakeholder engagement and transparency, while warning developing countries about potential 'regulatory chill,' administrative strain, and the disproportionate influence of private sector lobbying.

The report finds that GFANZ members, including major banks and asset managers, have provided hundreds of billions of dollars to companies expanding fossil fuel production. It argues that the alliance's sectoral guidelines and individual member policies are insufficient to prevent this expansion, often relying on flawed decarbonization targets that do not explicitly prohibit new fossil fuel supply. The document calls for the adoption of robust 'no-expansion' policies, alignment with UN Race to Zero criteria, and the implementation of meaningful accountability mechanisms to ensure financial flows are redirected toward clean energy.

The report details CAPE's 2023 efforts to reduce toxic exposures in Canada, highlighting the passage of Bill S-5 to modernize the Canadian Environmental Protection Act and the launch of the Place-Based Power Project focusing on extraction impacts in Northern B.C., Alberta, and the Northwest Territories.

The 2022 activities of the Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) show a sustained focus on climate change, with references appearing in 25 out of 33 State review processes. The Committee emphasized adaptation, mitigation, and the empowerment of children in policymaking, while specifically calling out the need for more ambitious emission reductions in developed nations like Germany. A significant portion of the CRC's work focused on the accountability of private actors in fossil fuel production and the extraterritorial obligations of States to protect children's rights abroad. Furthermore, the CRC developed a draft General Comment No. 26, which links a safe climate to the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment and advocates for the phasing out of fossil fuels.

The Canadian Climate Institute argues that the 2023 federal budget must prioritise clean growth to mitigate economic risks and compete with the United States' Inflation Reduction Act. The Institute identifies four priority areas for evaluation: the Canada Growth Fund, carbon contracts for difference, investment tax credits for electricity, and 'electro-federalism' to improve the electrical grid. The document highlights that climate change could cost the Canadian economy 25 billion in lost growth by 2025, while transitioning from fossil fuels to clean electricity could reduce average household energy bills by 12% by 2050.

The Canadian Climate Institute identifies key priorities for the 2023 Federal Budget to ensure Canada remains competitive in the global race to net zero, specifically focusing on mobilizing investment, leveraging carbon pricing, and upgrading electricity systems to reduce costs for households and businesses.