Search Climate Insights Directory

The briefing examines regional integration in Central Africa, contrasting the deeper economic and monetary integration of the Central Africa Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) with the broader, more politically focused Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS). It highlights the influence of France and the EU, the economic role of Nigeria, and the complexities of Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) negotiations, particularly regarding revenue loss from tariffs and the asymmetric development levels of member states.

The report analyzes the proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALW) in the DRC, CAR, and Chad, linking arms availability to historical instability, ethnic conflict, and poor governance. It assesses various disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) efforts, noting that while some institutional frameworks exist, they are often undermined by a lack of resources, political mistrust, and the persistence of non-state armed groups. The author argues that sustainable peace requires integrating disarmament with socio-economic development and regional cooperation.

The report examines the 'spaghetti bowl' of overlapping regional economic communities (RECs) in southern and eastern Africa, focusing on the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the Common Market of Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), and the East African Community (EAC). It highlights the institutional tensions caused by multiple memberships and the pressure from EU Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) negotiations. The authors argue that SACU should be positioned as a core 'fast-tracking' anchor for regional integration, but emphasize that it must first 'get the basics right' by improving trade facilitation, statistics, and its internal institutional framework before expanding.

The report analyzes power-sharing as a tool to mitigate civil conflict by guaranteeing political roles to potential 'spoilers'. It argues that while power-sharing can promote peace when parties are evenly matched and conflict costs are high, it may increase conflict risks when groups are unevenly matched. The authors highlight significant trade-offs, noting that power-sharing prioritizes 'ex post fairness' over democratic 'ex ante uncertainty' and can lead to high transaction costs and agency losses, such as the selection of intransigent, group-based politicians.

The document outlines the strategic cooperation between the European Union (EU) and Africa, focusing on the EU Strategy for Africa and the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD). It emphasizes the need for increased aid effectiveness, infrastructural development via the EU-Africa Infrastructure Partnership, and the creation of a Joint EU-Africa Strategy. Key priorities include poverty reduction, governance, peace and security, and energy cooperation, while highlighting the importance of African ownership of development strategies.

The report examines the 'commodity price problem,' characterized by extreme short-term volatility and a steady long-term decline in real prices relative to manufactured goods. While high prices can provide windfall revenues, the authors argue that dependence on primary commodities creates a 'resource trap' that undermines fiscal planning, exacerbates social inequality, and encourages environmental degradation. The document concludes that because developing countries lack the resources to hedge against these risks, the international community should focus on income stabilization through mechanisms such as compensatory financing, national revenue management, and risk management instruments.

The document lists the signature, ratification, and deposit dates for 53 African entities regarding the AU Convention on the Prevention and Combating of Terrorism. As of 23 June 2006, 48 countries had signed the convention, while 36 had completed ratification or accession and deposited their instruments.

The report analyzes the bidirectional relationship between biodiversity conservation and conflict in the Albertine Rift. It distinguishes between local-level conflicts directly caused by conservation interventions—such as restricted resource access and unequal benefit sharing—and regional armed conflicts driven by deep-rooted socio-economic and political factors. The document reviews several conflict-analysis methodologies, including 'Do No Harm' and 'Peace and Conflict Impact Assessment', to propose a multi-step framework for making conservation projects more conflict-sensitive throughout their project cycle.

The document argues that current global trade rules are inequitable and often lock developing countries into a dependence on volatile primary commodities, which increases the risk of civil war. It highlights how rich-country agricultural subsidies and market access restrictions undermine economic diversification in the South. Regarding aid, the text warns that development assistance can inadvertently build the capacity of oppressive regimes or be diverted by the strategic interests of donor nations. The series also examines the 'resource curse,' where natural resource wealth leads to corruption and instability, and proposes a combination of mandatory legal regulations, transparency initiatives like the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), and conflict-sensitive business practices to break the link between resource extraction and violence.

The document examines the DDR process in Burundi, detailing the transition from the South African Protection Support Detachment (SAPSD) and the African Union Mission in Burundi (AMIB) to the United Nations Operation in Burundi (ONUB). It outlines the technical stages of disarmament, demobilisation, and reintegration, highlighting the importance of the Joint Operations Plan (JOP) and the financial support of the European Union and World Bank. Key achievements include the demobilisation of nearly 20,000 ex-combatants and the integration of others into the Burundian National Defence Force (BNDF) and Burundian National Police (BNP). However, the report notes ongoing challenges in security sector reform (SSR) and the reintegration of former fighters into sustainable livelihoods.

The document examines the gap between Burundi's political progress toward democratic elections and the lagging implementation of socio-economic reconstruction outlined in Protocol IV of the Arusha Accords. It highlights critical failures in land tenure reform, the repatriation of refugees, and the support of internally displaced persons (IDPs). The author argues that extreme poverty, unequal resource distribution, and a reliance on short-term humanitarian aid rather than long-term development create a risk of relapse into conflict. Specific challenges include a crippling external debt burden, gender-based violence, and the potential for 'disaster capitalism' to undermine local land rights during the reconstruction process.

The document examines the shift toward 'vertical deepening' of peacekeeping, where the UN relies more on regional organisations like the African Union (AU) and its 'building blocks' (SADC, ECOWAS, IGAD, ECCAS/CEEAC, and EAC). It highlights a critical gap between Africa's political will and its financial capacity, noting that while the AU can provide troops, it cannot fund large-scale missions. The author analyzes the EU Peace Facility as a model for external support and proposes seven funding options for regional operations, ranging from UN assessed contributions to bilateral arrangements. The paper concludes that African peacekeeping should be a 'bridging force' for UN deployments rather than a total replacement, requiring sustained international investment in capacity-building and DDR (disarmament, demobilization, and resettlement).

The document analyzes the 2004 unrest in the Kivus, focusing on General Laurent Nkunda's military campaign and the failure of the DRC Transition Government to maintain stability. It highlights the role of ethnic manipulation of Tutsi and Banyamulenge communities, the destabilizing influence of Rwanda, and the internal fractures within the FARDC military regions. The report also details the Gatumba massacre in Burundi and the challenges of repatriating Banyamulenge refugees.

The document examines the failure of the Democratic Republic of Congo's transitional government to establish security and effective administration in the Kivu provinces. It highlights the persistence of parallel military command structures, the failure of disarmament and demobilization (DDR) processes, and the continued influence of foreign militias and Rwandan interests. While North Kivu shows some economic recovery under Governor Eugène Serufuli, the report warns that systemic corruption, ethnic tensions—particularly regarding the Banyarwanda—and political infighting in Kinshasa threaten the entire transition process.

The Political Dialogue Project in Burundi, funded by the UK's DFID and Sweden's SIDA, is managed by the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) with Jan van Eck as the sole consultant. The project aims to foster reconciliation, inclusive negotiations, and a democratic culture in Burundi. Mr. van Eck acts as an informal independent peace facilitator, leveraging trust and neutrality to broker dialogue and support the transitional government and cease-fire negotiations, including engagement with the Palipehutu-FNL armed movement.

The document analyzes the sustainability challenges of the coffee sector, such as declining prices and environmental degradation, and evaluates how different contracting systems can address these issues. It compares conventional contracts with alternative models like Fairtrade (FLO), Starbucks' Preferred Supplier Program, and Utz Kapeh, concluding that while contracts cannot solve macro-economic crises, they can improve producer stability through long-term agreements, price differentials, and preferred supplier status.

The briefing examines the risks associated with Burundi's planned November 2004 elections, highlighting the tension between peace-making and electioneering. It identifies critical unmet pre-conditions, including the lack of a new constitution and the continued presence of armed movements. The author warns that a 'win-lose' mentality and the militarization of political power—specifically the alliance between the Burundian Army and the FDD—threaten the ethnic compromises of the Arusha Peace Accord and could lead to a return to exclusionary politics.

The document analyzes the roles of SADC member states in the DRC conflict, categorizing them as 'hawks' (military interveners), 'doves' (diplomatic proponents), or 'penguins' (avoidant/complex positions). It argues that while the intervention by Angola, Namibia, and Zimbabwe caused economic strain and international criticism, it was grounded in SADC principles of sovereignty and solidarity. The paper contends that perceived rifts between these 'allies' and South Africa were largely mythical, as evidenced by subsequent regional security protocols and the SADC Mutual Defence Pact.

The document argues that the deployment of peacekeeping forces in Africa must account for the widespread presence of anti-personnel landmines. It discusses the development of the African Stand-by Force and the role of the Ottawa Convention in banning landmines, highlighting the specific challenges in the SADC region and South Africa's legislative efforts to criminalise landmine possession and production.

The peace process in Burundi remained deadlocked in September 2003 despite multiple regional summits. The impasse centers on the CNDD-FDD's refusal to recognize the Arusha Accord and the TGoB's insistence on maintaining the existing political balance. Key points of contention include the division of power—specifically the demand for a Second Vice-President post—and the reform of the armed forces, including the abolition of the gendarmerie and the control of military zones. Regional mediators from South Africa, Uganda, and Tanzania have pursued differing strategies, ranging from military intervention to diplomatic compromise, but have failed to secure a final agreement.