Search Climate Insights Directory

Richard Ottinger proposes that the U.S. government, specifically under the Trump administration, adopt a business-oriented 'insurance' approach to climate change. He argues that because the potential costs of failure—including mass displacement, food insecurity, and national security threats—far outweigh the costs of mitigation, taking action is a prudent risk management strategy. Ottinger highlights that transitioning to cheap renewable energy and energy efficiency would provide additional health and economic benefits.

ClientEarth criticizes the European Commission's Roadmap for the REFIT Evaluation of pesticides legislation, claiming it overemphasizes implementation costs over benefits and fails to incorporate the precautionary principle. The organization highlights inconsistencies between this roadmap and other chemical legislation evaluations, specifically regarding risk management terminology and endocrine disruptor 'cut-off' criteria, and argues that separating the evaluation of pesticide use (Directive 2009/128) from pesticide placement (Regulation 1107/2009) makes the process incomplete.

The report identifies a 'double jeopardy' for residents of Harrisburg/Manchester and Galena Park in east Houston, who face both significantly higher daily exposure to toxic air pollutants and a greater risk of catastrophic chemical accidents due to their proximity to high-risk industrial facilities. In contrast, wealthier communities in west Houston, such as Bellaire and West Oaks/Eldridge, have far lower exposure levels and fewer nearby hazardous facilities. The document advocates for systemic regulatory changes, including the adoption of safer technologies, improved emergency communication, and the implementation of health impact assessments to address these environmental justice disparities.

The GCF Board's twelfth meeting resulted in the endorsement of the initial Strategic Plan (2015-2018) and the accreditation of 13 entities, including HSBC and the African Development Bank. Key operational milestones included the adoption of a Comprehensive Information Disclosure Policy, the establishment of a Budget Committee, and the approval of a risk register. The Board also addressed resource mobilization, noting a USD 3 billion contribution arrangement from the United States and approving a budget increase for Secretariat staffing to approximately 100 members by the end of 2016. Additionally, the Board initiated the process for appointing a new Executive Director and approved a USD 1.5 million grant for project preparation in Rwanda.

The document argues that in interconnected societies, security is no longer a state of protection but an emergent process of activity. It posits that resilience has become a way of governing where insecurity is accepted as unavoidable, shifting the focus from predicting risk to developing a 'know-how-to-respond'. The author highlights the role of digital technologies in creating 'interconnection ecosystems' and facilitating self-organization through the 'crowd', while distinguishing between resilience as a general principle and resilience as a prescriptive program of control.

The document analyzes the tension between the risk-management approach of the UNFCCC and the justice-based demands for compensation regarding climate-induced loss and damage. It evaluates four scientific traits—attributability, irreversibility, unavoidability, and intolerability—concluding that while science can inform risk management, the determination of liability and compensation remains a political and value-based challenge.

The document analyzes the scarcity of agricultural financing in developing countries, where risks like natural hazards and high transaction costs deter lenders. It categorizes financial needs into four groups: farmers/entrepreneurs, value chain actors, rural infrastructure, and R&D. The brief details a range of instruments from informal savings and micro-finance to complex value-chain and infrastructure financing. It emphasizes the government's role in risk management through credit guarantees and insurance subsidies, and the importance of flexible regulatory frameworks to attract investment while protecting savings.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) Board met in March 2015 to finalize key operational frameworks. The Board accredited seven entities, including the Asian Development Bank and UNDP, and adopted a Gender Policy and Action Plan (2015–2017). It established financial terms for grants and concessional loans, including a distinction between high and low concessionality for the public sector. The Board also approved the terms of reference for an independent Technical Advisory Panel and a Policy on Ethics and Conflicts of Interest. Discussions continued on the Private Sector Facility and the Initial Resource Mobilization process, with a target for 50% of Berlin pledges to be signed by April 30, 2015.

The document examines the vulnerability of coastal sectors in SIDS to climate change and the inadequacy of current coping mechanisms. It proposes micro-insurance as a tool to protect low-income populations from specific perils, identifying barriers such as mistrust and cost, while suggesting policy options like state subsidies and public-private partnerships to implement these schemes.

The paper identifies policy, knowledge, and funding gaps as primary barriers to private investment in climate resilience. It finds that DFIs use a mix of technical assistance, long-term debt, and concessional finance to stimulate demand and reduce risk. Key findings vary by region: in developed countries, regulatory compliance and ageing infrastructure drive investment; in upper-middle-income countries, technical audits and market studies are critical; and in developing countries, intermediated financing through local banks and agricultural supply chains is essential to reach SMEs.

The report examines the intersection of financial systems and societal security, arguing that both fields have historically relied on probabilistic risk models but are shifting toward managing 'radical uncertainty'. It details various financial risk models—such as Modern Portfolio Theory, CAPM, and Value at Risk (VaR)—and contrasts them with security methodologies like scenario planning and pre-emption. The author concludes that the 'financialisation of security' and 'securitisation of finance' reflect a broader liberal security problematic of securing circulation in a complex, interdependent world, where societal security is increasingly defined by qualitative resilience and preparedness rather than quantified prediction.

The document argues that traditional food security monitoring focuses too heavily on outputs and outcomes, which are often difficult to attribute to specific actions. It proposes 'process-based indicators' as proxies to measure the quality of decision-making, institutional capacity, and inclusivity. Using the FIPAT tool in Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua, the authors identify key indicators across six areas: policy vulnerability, system resilience, decision-making transparency, multistakeholder participation, lessons learned, and decentralization. The briefing emphasizes that effective food security policies require inclusive participation of vulnerable groups, empowered local decision-makers, and a shift in institutional culture to view policy review as a dynamic, non-punitive process.

The paper examines the relationship between climate change and disaster risk, arguing that while adaptation and DRR serve distinct purposes, they share a core goal of reducing vulnerability. It highlights how climate change drives disaster risk through extreme weather and how poor development practices can exacerbate this risk. The authors advocate for a risk-based approach and transformative change that addresses the underlying social and economic drivers of vulnerability, rather than focusing solely on event-based response.

The briefing analyzes the six-year experience of the Climate Investment Funds (CIFs) as a 'living laboratory' to offer strategic advice for the Green Climate Fund (GCF). It highlights the need for balancing rapid fund deployment with detailed operational guidelines, the importance of evidence-based learning despite costs, and the necessity of clear theories of change for achieving transformational impacts. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for an early definition of risk appetite to avoid limiting investment instruments and the critical role of multi-stakeholder partnerships in project design and implementation.

The report argues that limited access to finance hinders agro-value chain productivity and increases vulnerability to climate hazards. While some models, such as a coffee credit scheme in Uganda, show potential to reduce vulnerability by improving farm-level finance, the banking sector generally fails to account for climate risks. The document recommends that banks integrate climate risk into strategies, incentivize adaptation, develop new products through collaboration, and increase financial inclusion, particularly for women.

Manitoba's winter road system, essential for remote communities, faced reduced operational windows in the late 1990s and early 2000s due to warmer winters, resulting in additional costs of $15 million to $18 million for air transport of goods. To address this, the province implemented a resilience strategy involving the relocation of roads away from water bodies and the construction of overland routes. The success of these adaptations was attributed to policy coherence with northern development strategies, the use of scientific temperature projections, stakeholder engagement, the inherent flexibility of annually rebuilt roads, and a risk-management framing of the issue.

The document explores the historical and legal foundations of fiduciary duties, emphasizing their role in protecting beneficiaries from the inherent conflicts of interest and information asymmetries in asset management. It argues that climate change and environmental risks are now material financial factors that fiduciaries must integrate into their risk management to avoid a dereliction of duty. Using examples from South Africa, the United States, the Netherlands, and Norway, the report illustrates how different jurisdictions are transitioning toward sustainable asset management and suggests a roadmap for China to establish similar culturally appropriate fiduciary principles.

The document argues that deep energy retrofits—those reducing energy consumption by 50% or more—generate significant, often overlooked business value. It introduces the RMI Retrofit Value Model, which categorizes this value into nine elements: retrofit development costs, non-energy property operating costs, retrofit risk mitigation, health costs, employee costs, promotions and marketing costs, customer access and sales, property-derived revenues, and enterprise risk management. The guide provides methodologies for quantifying these benefits, such as calculating reduced absenteeism and improved worker productivity, and offers a sample report to demonstrate how to synthesize these findings for capital requests. It concludes with best practices for risk mitigation and principles for presenting value to decision-makers.

The document details how warming winters in northern Manitoba have shortened the operational window of essential winter roads, leading to increased costs and safety risks. It describes the government's response, which involved using scientific projections to justify increased funding for upgrading and relocating roads to enhance resilience.

The ADAPTool Guidebook describes a structured process for evaluating whether public policies are 'adaptive'—meaning they can respond effectively to both anticipated and unanticipated shocks. The tool assesses policies against seven core characteristics: integrated and forward-looking analysis, multistakeholder deliberation, automatic policy adjustment, self-organization and social networking, decentralization of decision-making, promoting variation, and formal policy review and continuous learning. The process involves a scoping phase to define geographic scope and stressors, data collection via interviews or research, and a synthesis phase that ranks policies based on 'planned adaptability' (response to known stressors) and 'autonomous adaptability' (response to unforeseen changes).