Search Climate Insights Directory

The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) is an international non-profit research organization that integrates scientific research with policy analysis to promote sustainability. Operating through eight global centers, SEI focuses on climate change, water, air, and land use, while incorporating perspectives on governance, economics, gender, and human health. Its regional centers provide specialized expertise in areas such as sustainable urbanization in Africa, climate adaptation in Asia, and environmental governance in the Baltic region and European Union.

The document introduces the LEAP simulation model, which is used for energy demand and supply analysis, forecasting, and impact assessment, particularly in developing countries. It details the model's five modules: demand, transformation, biomass, environment, and evaluation. To provide practical experience, the guide uses a case study of the 'Wood Hills district'—a rural tropical area—to walk users through exercises in organizing energy demand data, calculating charcoal conversion efficiencies, assessing biomass resource accessibility, and developing comparative scenarios to evaluate interventions like improved cookstoves.

The report finds that the average Scottish diet has a food Footprint of 0.75 global hectares (gha) per person, with meat being the primary driver of environmental impact. Transitioning to a diet based on healthy eating recommendations can reduce this Footprint by 15% to 25%. Further reductions are possible through vegetarianism, sourcing local produce, and choosing organic options, with an ideal 'Best Diet' (healthy, vegetarian, local, and organic) reducing the Footprint by approximately 40% to 0.46 gha/cap.

The TRANSrisk project (2015-2018) focuses on assessing low-emission transition pathways by integrating quantitative models with qualitative stakeholder consultations. The project seeks to transform how climate policy pathways are evaluated by analyzing synergies and conflicts with other sustainable development goals, examining innovation policies across different socio-technical contexts, and assessing the risks and uncertainties associated with policy implementation. Its primary goals include providing decision-makers with tools to evaluate socio-economic costs and benefits and contributing to international scientific assessments like the IPCC.

Thailand is promoting a bioeconomy to escape the middle-income trap and reduce social inequality, focusing heavily on the industrial processing of sugarcane and cassava into high-value products and biofuels. While integrated into national strategies like Thailand 4.0 and the 20-year National Strategy, the transition faces significant hurdles, including land and water scarcity, low wages for sugarcane workers, and environmental pollution from field burning.

The document outlines a strategy to minimize conflict in renewable energy deployment by identifying 'energy soils'—areas with high technical potential and low social or environmental sensitivity. It proposes a participatory process involving local energy planning, community engagement, and the establishment of energy communities to ensure social acceptance and shared benefits.

The document criticizes the Indonesian government's push for B50 and Bioethanol (E20) as a response to Middle East oil supply crises. It claims these policies will lead to massive deforestation, carbon emission increases, and the 'whitewashing' of illegal palm oil plantations. The author asserts that the program benefits conglomerates and creates trade dependency on the US, proposing instead a shift toward public transportation to reduce fuel demand.

The report critiques the Indonesian government's plan to move its capital to East Kalimantan, specifically in the Penajam Paser Utara and Kutai Kartanegara regencies. It argues that the project is a 'political commodity' designed to benefit oligarchs and corporations who hold extensive mining, forestry, and plantation concessions in the area. The document highlights significant environmental threats, including the destruction of mangrove ecosystems in Balikpapan Bay, the risk of floods, and continued reliance on coal power. It also warns of the marginalization and potential eviction of indigenous peoples, such as the Balik tribe, and criticizes the lack of transparency in financing and public participation.

The Climate 2030 Blueprint proposes a combination of a cap-and-trade program and sector-specific complementary policies to reduce U.S. heat-trapping emissions. The analysis indicates that by 2030, the Blueprint could achieve a 56 percent drop in emissions from 2005 levels while generating net annual savings of $464 billion for consumers and businesses. The electricity sector is identified as the primary driver of these reductions, with significant contributions from energy efficiency and renewable energy. The report also highlights improvements in energy security through reduced oil imports and the potential for carbon sequestration in U.S. forests and farmlands.

Inland flooding in the United States is driven by a combination of climate-induced increases in heavy rainfall and land-use practices that reduce the landscape's ability to absorb water. Rising global temperatures increase evaporation and the atmosphere's capacity to hold water vapor, leading to more frequent and heavier precipitation. Additionally, the destruction of natural areas, development in floodplains, and the creation of impermeable surfaces like asphalt exacerbate flood risks.

The technical appendices describe the use of a Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) general equilibrium model to simulate the effects of adopting the MyPlate and Harvard Healthy Eating Plate dietary guidelines. The analysis focuses on the resulting shifts in U.S. crop acreage, specifically the reduction of cereal grain production in favor of fruits, vegetables, and other crops. Key findings include a projected 8% decline in U.S. cereal grain acreage under the Harvard scenario and significant changes in land rental rates and production levels for various food sectors.

The document evaluates the world's progress against six sectoral milestones designed to align global action with the 1.5°C goal. It concludes that while some progress has been made, particularly in renewable energy, overall action is insufficient and uneven. The report emphasizes the need for updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement and calls for improved data transparency and monitoring systems to accurately track progress and ensure accountability.

The document outlines technical requirements for improving forest carbon monitoring in Brazil, Colombia, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand, emphasizing the need for more frequent data updates, consistent methods, and better spatial resolution to evaluate the effectiveness of national forest policies.

The document argues that corporate environmental targets often focus on feasibility or competitiveness rather than ecological necessity. Drawing on work conducted with Mars Incorporated in 2016, it discusses the considerations managers must address when setting science-based targets for their impact on climate, land, and water to preserve resources for future generations.

The document argues that changing the language used to describe food is a low-cost strategy to increase the consumption of plant-based foods, which have lower environmental impacts than meat. Following workshops in the US and UK with over 50 experts, the report outlines five guiding research questions and recommendations for implementing these findings in business and society.

The World Resources Institute, in partnership with the World Cocoa Foundation and Climate Focus, developed two tools to support deforestation-free cocoa commitments in West Africa. The West Africa Cocoa Dataset aggregates data from 19 companies, identifying 840,000 unique plots covering approximately 1.5 million hectares. To protect farmer privacy, this dataset is shared as a heat map rather than raw plot data. The Cocoa Deforestation Risk Assessment provides a harmonized method to prioritize deforestation prevention; it found that recent forest loss significantly influences risk levels, while legal protections in areas like Taï National Park and Bia National Park correlate with lower priority rankings due to a lack of recent loss.

The document introduces 'Mapping Together', a guide for using the open-source tool Collect Earth to track biophysical restoration goals. It details a process involving local stakeholders to monitor land use, tree cover, and spatial patterns. The guide provides four case studies from El Salvador, Ethiopia, India, and Rwanda to demonstrate how governments identify restoration opportunities and track progress toward forest cover targets, and outlines an 8-step methodology for implementing mapathons.

The document analyzes the impact of food loss and waste, noting that approximately 24 percent of calories produced for human consumption are lost or wasted. It argues that halving this rate by 2050 could significantly reduce the global food gap, saving an estimated 1,314 trillion kilocalories per year. The paper highlights that these inefficiencies lead to reduced farmer incomes, increased consumer costs, and environmental damage, including greenhouse gas emissions and inefficient land and water use.

The report analyzes the challenges and opportunities for food buyers in North America and Europe to source lower-emissions beef. It evaluates emerging technologies like feed additives, 'climate friendly' labels, and different production methods including organic, grass-fed, and regenerative beef. The document concludes that food buyers should reduce the volume of beef served, identify sourcing priorities to meet sustainability commitments, and engage directly with producers to adopt lower-emitting practices.

The analysis finds that pursuing a net zero emissions pathway by 2050 in Ethiopia would increase the average real annual GDP growth rate by 1.4 percent relative to a business-as-usual scenario. While the NZE pathway requires an additional US$66.98 billion in cumulative investment costs by 2050, it is projected to generate $111 billion in cumulative co-benefits through increased real GDP and avoid $89 billion in costs, primarily in energy. Social co-benefits include an average of 672,000 additional green jobs and significant increases in disposable incomes (10.5 percent by 2030 and 53.1 percent by 2050). The benefit-cost ratio for investments in mitigation and adaptation is estimated to rise from 1.04 in 2030 to 2.99 by 2050.