Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the intersection of foreign investment and environmental sustainability in Lao PDR, focusing on the hydropower, mining, and construction sectors. It highlights a gap between the government's formal environmental policies and actual implementation, noting that large-scale projects often bypass rigorous environmental impact assessments (EIAs). The document specifically discusses the Nam Theun 2 dam as a case study of social and environmental displacement, and it analyzes the role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and international standards in mitigating industrial damage.

Earthjustice blocked Florida Power & Light's proposal for a massive coal-fired power plant at the edge of the Florida Everglades in 2007. The Florida Public Service Commission rejected the project based on evidence regarding climate change, lack of energy conservation, and cost effectiveness. Consequently, Florida Power & Light invested $300 million in a 75 megawatt solar thermal facility, completed in 2010, which became the largest of its kind in the eastern United States.

The document summarizes key scientific literature on climate change, including the role of CO2 in temperature variation, ocean warming, sea level rise, and ecological impacts. It highlights foundational research from Svante Arrhenius and Charles Keeling, as well as reports from the IPCC and the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Key findings include the detection of human-induced ocean heat increases, the potential for significant sea level rise from ice sheet melt, and the correlation between rising tropical sea surface temperatures and increased hurricane destructiveness.

Earthjustice successfully challenged the air permit for a proposed coal-fired power plant in Kansas, leading the Kansas Supreme Court to invalidate the permit in 2013. The project, proposed by Sunflower Electric, was criticized for being unnecessary and potentially emitting significant greenhouse gases and pollutants.

The document examines how trade policies influence climate change through scale, composition, technique, and direct effects, and analyzes the legal interactions between WTO law and the UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol. It also assesses the physical impacts of climate change on trade infrastructure and the competitiveness implications of implementing climate regulations.

The document identifies several trade policy levers to address climate change, including the liberalization of trade in low-emission goods, the reinstatement of subsidies for greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction, the removal of domestic barriers to clean energy investment, the relaxation of intellectual property rights for green technologies, and the reduction of fossil fuel subsidies. It emphasizes that trade policy must be part of a broader suite of complementary fiscal and regulatory measures and suggests that while the WTO is the primary venue for multilateral action, plurilateral or regional agreements may serve as alternatives.

The report examines the implementation of the Montreal Protocol through the lens of the Swedish Ozone Layer Protection programme (OLP), identifying country ownership, capacity building, and stakeholder participation as critical governance factors for success. It argues that a shift from top-down regulation to bottom-up governance is necessary for sustainable national implementation of MEAs.

The document details how whole building design and climate-responsive architecture reduce energy consumption. It highlights specific features such as cool roofs, tight building shells, and Energy Star appliances, noting that energy-efficient homes can reduce heating, cooling, and hot water costs by 30 to 40 percent compared to conventional new homes. It also addresses barriers to adoption, including the high cost of retrofitting existing buildings and the lack of federal energy codes.

Concentrating solar power (CSP) uses mirrors to focus sunlight to generate electricity, offering the lowest cost among solar technologies at $0.09 to $0.12 per kWh for plants over 10 MW. The document details three primary technologies: trough systems, power tower systems, and dish systems, noting that trough and tower systems can store heat for use after dark. While the US has significant potential—specifically in the Southwest—high capital costs and the requirement for direct sunlight remain primary challenges. The US Department of Energy projects costs could drop to $0.04 to $0.05 per kWh in the coming decades.

The document outlines various ocean energy technologies, including tidal dams, fences, turbines, wave energy converters, and Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC). It highlights existing installations in France, China, and Canada, and notes that while these resources are renewable and pollution-free, they face challenges such as high capital costs, specific site requirements, and potential impacts on sea life migration.

The document describes photovoltaic (PV) systems as semiconductor-based technology that converts sunlight into electricity. It highlights that PV is viable across most of the United States, with the potential for a 90-mile square station to meet the country's peak demand. Key benefits include the prevention of greenhouse gas emissions, the creation of high-technology jobs, and increased domestic energy security. While utility-scale costs range from $0.20 to $0.30 per kWh, the document notes that high upfront capital costs and intermittent power remain primary issues, though these can be mitigated by battery storage and utility-scale experimentation projects.

The document outlines how solar architecture—comprising passive and active systems—can be used globally to reduce energy costs and pollution. It details specific technologies like Trombe walls and sunspaces, noting that new office buildings can reduce energy costs by 30 to 50 percent. While active solar heating systems have higher initial costs than electrical systems, they are projected to pay for themselves within 7 to 10 years.

The document describes solar water heating systems, which use solar collectors and storage tanks to provide hot water, space heating, and air conditioning. In the United States, over 1.5 million homes and businesses use these systems, with a potential for 29 million installations if 40% of homes have sufficient sunlight. The technology is categorized into direct and indirect systems for temperature management, and passive (thermosiphons) and active (pump-based) systems for circulation. While initial costs are higher than conventional heaters ($1,500–$3,500 versus $150–$450), they typically pay for themselves within 4 to 8 years through energy savings. Environmental benefits include the prevention of over 50 tons of carbon dioxide emissions per unit over 20 years.

As of early 2006, the U.S. wind industry had a generating capacity of 9,149 MW, with 2005 seeing a 35 percent growth in capacity. The document details various federal incentives, including the Production Tax Credit (PTC) and Clean Renewable Energy Bonds (CREBS), as well as state-level mechanisms like Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) and Public Benefit Funds (PBF). It highlights the potential for wind energy to provide up to 20 percent of the U.S. power supply if natural gas prices remain above $4 per thousand cubic feet.

Solar water heating (SWH) systems provide a cost-effective way to reduce reliance on fossil fuels for heating water, which accounts for up to 14 percent of average US household energy use. These systems, which range from $2,000 to $5,000 for residential use, can meet 50 to 80 percent of a typical household's hot water needs, and up to 100 percent in climates like Hawaii. The guide details various system types—including flat panel collectors and direct, indirect, and drain-back systems—tailored to different climatic conditions. It also highlights the efficiency of solar pool heating and the role of utility incentives and policy support in increasing adoption.

Earthjustice and a coalition of organizations successfully challenged the Bush-era EPA's 2003 denial of a petition to limit carbon emissions from cars and trucks. This led to the 2007 Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. EPA, which defined carbon emissions as "air pollutants" under the Clean Air Act and required the EPA to set limits if they threaten public health or welfare. Consequently, the EPA determined in 2009 that carbon pollution endangers the public and established the first federal carbon pollution limits for vehicles in 2010, a move upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2012.

A letter from Scientists for Global Responsibility to the UK Secretary of State for the Environment proposing that the successor to the Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology Commission should have a comprehensive mandate. The author advocates for a focus on sustainable agriculture, the reduction of oil dependency in farming and transport, and independent research into the long-term health and environmental effects of GM crops, while ensuring the body's membership is free from industry bias.

The report argues that while fuel cells have high initial capital costs, they can be cost-effective by capturing 'distributed benefits' such as deferring utility distribution investments, providing premium reliability for the digital economy, and meeting strict urban emission standards. It proposes a commercialization path starting with grid-connected systems in commercial buildings and semiconductor fabs, eventually integrating with fuel-cell vehicles through vehicle-to-grid (V2G) systems.

The report analyzes the economic trade-offs between decentralized and centralized wastewater systems, arguing that while treatment plants exhibit economies of scale, collection networks often exhibit diseconomies of scale. It highlights the financial advantages of modular, 'just-in-time' capacity expansion and the potential for water reuse and nutrient harvesting. The document also details various economic valuation methods for non-market environmental goods and the importance of professional management to ensure system reliability.

The document emphasizes that scientific uncertainties should not justify delaying preventive actions against climate change. It highlights robust facts, such as the role of greenhouse gases and the delaying effect of aerosols and ocean inertia, to argue for a precautionary approach. The author notes that current efforts, including the Kyoto Protocol, are insufficient to stabilize atmospheric concentrations, and calls for industrial countries to lead emissions reductions to ensure global equity and sustainable development.