Search Climate Insights Directory

ClientEarth proposes a comprehensive overhaul of the EU Fisheries State Aid Guidelines to integrate strict environmental and climate protections. The document argues that State aid should be conditional on compliance with EU environmental law and the Common Fisheries Policy, specifically calling for a ban on subsidies for new fishing vessels, fossil fuel energy costs, and harmful fishing gear. It suggests introducing a 'greenwashing test' for sustainable seafood claims and requiring 'climate and environment compatibility' assessments for all aid measures to prevent overcapacity and support the transition to a sustainable blue economy.

The report finds broad support among U.S. registered voters for clean energy policies and government action on global warming, though views on economic impacts and specific political actions remain divided along party lines.

A September 2021 survey of 898 registered U.S. voters reveals broad support for clean energy policies and the prioritization of global warming by the federal government, though significant ideological divides persist regarding economic impacts and the use of national emergency declarations.

The report warns that South Africa is on a 'worst-case' climate trajectory (RCP 8.5), which will lead to extreme heat, water scarcity, and food insecurity, disproportionately harming youth. It details regional collapses in agriculture and tourism, the expansion of informal settlements due to climate-induced migration, and the severe mental health trauma facing children. The author argues that without a rapid phase-out of fossil fuels, large parts of the country may become uninhabitable, leading to systemic social conflict and economic collapse.

Climate Central's analysis of weather station data from 225 locations across 17 U.S. states reveals a significant increase in fire weather days since the 1970s, driven primarily by warming and decreasing relative humidity. The report highlights that interior regions have seen higher increases than coastal areas, with some parts of New Mexico experiencing two additional months of fire weather compared to nearly 50 years ago. Beyond increasing wildfire risk, these conditions have led utilities like PG&E to implement public safety power shutoffs (PSPSs) to prevent equipment-related ignitions, resulting in significant economic impacts and health risks. The document argues that while land management and localized grids can mitigate risk, long-term stabilization requires reducing carbon pollution to net zero by 2050.

The document examines a landmark Australian Federal Court ruling where Justice Mordecai Bromberg found that the Federal Environment Minister owes a duty of care to young people to protect them from the climate crisis. While the court did not grant an injunction against the expansion of the Vickery coal mine, the ruling establishes a precedent for climate-based litigation under the law of negligence and requires the government to consider the impacts of climate change on youth when approving fossil fuel projects.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) states that the IPCC 6th Assessment Report confirms severe climate change impacts on health at 1 degree of warming and reinforces the urgent need to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. CAPE argues that while the technical expertise to transition from fossil fuels exists, Canada lacks the political leadership required to implement bold changes. The organization emphasizes that avoiding warming is essential for human health and urges Canadian political leaders, particularly ahead of a federal election, to present clear plans for mitigation and adaptation.

The report advocates for a systemic shift in Africa's energy landscape, moving away from fossil fuels toward a decentralized, community-owned 100% renewable energy system by 2050. Based on modeling by Dr. Sven Teske, the plan suggests that achieving this goal requires an annual investment of approximately $130 billion. The document emphasizes that this transition would not only mitigate climate impacts and address severe energy poverty—where approximately half of sub-Saharan Africans lack electricity—but also create up to 7 million jobs by 2050. It calls for a 'just and feminist transition' that prioritizes gender equity and workers' rights. To fund the plan, the authors propose ending illicit financial flows, canceling African debt, and demanding that developed nations fulfill their climate finance obligations.

The document argues that the COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis share analytical similarities as global shocks that exacerbate existing inequalities. It identifies six key lessons for South Africa: the necessity of accessible social protection, the need to value care work, the requirement for a strong and proactive state, the importance of localising industrial processes, the necessity of international cooperation, and the need to center justice in responses to mitigate worsening inequalities.

The Centre for Environmental Rights asserts that South Africa's transition from coal must go beyond energy shifts to encompass a radical restructuring of society. The author warns that southern Africa is warming at twice the global rate, making incremental change impossible. The document advocates for an "Open Agenda for a Just Transition" that integrates clean energy with food sovereignty, gender justice, and a new economic system based on human needs rather than profit.

The document argues that while the European Central Bank's (ECB) revised monetary strategy acknowledges climate threats, its concrete actions and implementation timeline are insufficient. Reclaim Finance, Greenpeace, 350.org, and Koala Kollektiv recommend that the ECB immediately stop supporting companies incompatible with EU greenhouse gas reduction goals, specifically by excluding fossil fuel project developers from asset purchases and the collateral framework, and accelerate its implementation schedule to address climate risks.

The document advocates for a multifaceted approach to plastic pollution that combines a circular economy with the use of renewable, plant-based feedstocks to replace virgin plastics derived from fossil fuels. It emphasizes that because infinite recycling is impossible, some virgin plastic remains necessary for health and safety standards. To prevent new environmental issues, the Bioplastic Feedstock Alliance (BFA) urges policymakers to implement sustainability metrics—covering carbon emissions, water use, and impacts on wildlife and communities—to ensure plant-based plastics are responsibly sourced and managed.

The report examines the trade implications of global climate policies on developing nations, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and least developed countries (LDCs). It finds that while fossil fuel exports face significant short-to-medium term threats due to decarbonization, the transition to renewable energy creates substantial growth potential for non-ferrous metals and specialty minerals. However, the report warns that these opportunities require significant investment and economic diversification to avoid the 'resource curse'. Agricultural exports are less directly affected by energy transitions but remain vulnerable to greenhouse gas intensity standards and consumer preferences in importing markets.

The document contends that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an expensive, energy-intensive technology that entrenches fossil fuel reliance rather than facilitating a transition to renewable energy. It identifies Louisiana as a primary target for CCS development due to existing petrochemical infrastructure and a regulatory environment managed by the Department of Natural Resources. The brief warns that CCS infrastructure, including pipelines, poses severe health and safety risks—such as toxic gas leaks and catastrophic ruptures—and would disproportionately impact Black, Brown, and Indigenous communities. Furthermore, it asserts that CCS threatens Louisiana's wetlands and that the majority of captured carbon is currently used for enhanced oil recovery to produce more oil.

The report identifies tax regulations as a primary barrier preventing US utilities from adopting low-cost renewable energy. It highlights how 'tax normalization' and the lack of tax liability for non-profit or loss-carrying utilities create 'perverse incentives' that favor fossil fuels. To meet President Biden's goal of 100 percent clean electricity by 2035, the author proposes eliminating tax normalization for the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and introducing 'direct pay' mechanisms to ensure all utility types can access clean energy incentives.

The authors warn that unilateral solar geoengineering research, particularly by the United States, risks deterring fossil fuel mitigation and concentrating power among elites. They argue that any such research must be multilaterally governed under the United Nations and preceded by inclusive public deliberations to avoid the militarization of planetary-scale climate interventions.

The text highlights the human costs of plastic pollution, noting that production and incineration facilities are often sited in marginalized communities without adequate consultation. It links plastic production to respiratory and immune system health issues and climate change, while calling for extended producer responsibility and federal legislation to protect vulnerable populations.

The document argues that current national climate pledges are inadequate to limit warming to 1.5°C and calls for a transition away from fossil fuels rather than relying on net-zero promises. It emphasizes the need for rigorous rules for Article 6 carbon trading to prevent double-counting and protect human rights, criticizes the omission of loss and damage from the SB52 agenda, and highlights how the virtual format of the negotiations impairs the participation of civil society and Indigenous Peoples.

The document outlines a discussion on transitioning the U.S. energy system, focusing on repurposing existing infrastructure, ensuring the affordability and reliability of renewables, and addressing the impacts of energy modernization on marginalized communities and the workforce.

The report presents survey data from 922 registered U.S. voters, revealing broad support for various climate-friendly energy and conservation policies, though opinions on economic impacts and the urgency of federal action remain sharply divided along political lines.