Search Climate Insights Directory

Rapid urban development in Da Nang's floodplains is increasing the frequency and severity of floods during extreme rain events. Climate change is projected to further increase rainfall intensity, potentially raising the intensity of events similar to the 2007 storms by 3 to 24% by the end of the 2020s. The document warns that construction standards based on historical data, including the 1999 storm, are insufficient for future risks, and that continued expansion into low-lying areas without multi-hazard resilient construction could lead to severe damage and loss of life.

The document outlines recommendations for government officials in Ahmedabad to build resilience against extreme heat, noting that Ahmedabad is the first Indian city to establish a comprehensive early warning system and preparedness plan for such events.

The document focuses on the vulnerability of outdoor construction workers in Ahmedabad to extreme heat, advocating for coordinated action among government, labor groups, and healthcare providers to mitigate heat stress.

The document focuses on the heightened vulnerability of approximately two million slum residents in Ahmedabad to extreme heat events, noting their increased exposure, susceptibility to health effects, and limited adaptation options.

The document describes how climate change and human pressures will affect the Great Lakes Region, specifically highlighting risks to human health, the regional economy, and the cultural sense of place.

The document details the development of Ahmedabad's Heat Action Plan, a pilot initiative led by a coalition of academic, health, and environmental groups including the NRDC and IIPH. Triggered by a deadly heat wave in May 2010, the plan focuses on early warning systems, community outreach, and capacity building for health workers. Key successes include strong municipal leadership and the use of scientific research to identify vulnerable groups, such as slum dwellers and outdoor workers. The document highlights the importance of interagency coordination and the need to treat heat waves as natural disasters to secure political will and funding.

The report highlights the vulnerability of iconic U.S. landmarks to climate-driven events. It details how sea level rise and storm surges threaten coastal sites like the Statue of Liberty and Jamestown, while increased heat and drought drive destructive wildfires in the West, affecting sites like Mesa Verde. The authors argue that climate resilience must become a national priority, requiring both resource allocation for site protection and a reduction in carbon emissions to mitigate future risks.

The report examines the vulnerability of iconic U.S. landmarks to climate change, highlighting risks such as sea level rise in coastal cities and increased wildfire activity in the Southwest. It argues for urgent national priority in climate resilience and carbon emission reduction to protect cultural heritage.

The document identifies significant gaps between the production of disaster risk assessments and their application in policy, particularly in Latin America and the Caribbean. It argues that risk assessments often fail because they are treated as one-off projects rather than continuous processes, lack alignment with political timescales, and are presented in overly technical language. To improve uptake, the guide recommends engaging end-users in design, targeting sectoral agendas, and building local technical capacity.

The paper examines how climate vulnerability in the UK is concentrated among disadvantaged and socially marginalized groups, such as those on low incomes, particularly regarding high temperatures and flooding. It warns that adaptation efforts relying on market forces or ignoring social vulnerability may lead to maladaptation, reinforcing existing inequalities.

A March 2013 survey of 2,000 Virginia adults who watch local TV news found that a large majority (85%) believe climate change is happening, though only about half are very or extremely sure. Many residents perceive an increase in extremely hot days and intense storms, often attributing this to climate change. Significant disparities in perception and trust exist across demographic lines, with Democrats, women, and urban residents generally more likely to view climate change as a human-caused problem and a personal risk, while Republicans and older adults are more likely to see weather changes as unrelated to climate change.

The April 2013 report 'Extreme Weather and Climate Change in the American Mind' reveals that 58% of Americans believe global warming is affecting U.S. weather. A significant majority (85%) reported experiencing extreme weather in the past year, with 37% stating they suffered moderate or great harm. While over half of Americans believe a natural disaster in their community is likely in the coming year, only 31% have a family emergency plan and 36% have a supply kit. Communication about these events remains primarily face-to-face or via phone, despite some use of social media.

The document outlines a framework for Ahmedabad to mitigate the deadly effects of extreme heat, which saw temperatures reach 46.8°C (116°F) during a May 2010 heat wave. It identifies a wide network of stakeholders across central, state, and municipal governments and recommends the creation of a Heat-Health Nodal Office to coordinate communication and response. Key proposed actions include installing additional weather gauges, implementing passive cooling like white china mosaic roofs, and expanding urban green cover. The brief emphasizes the need for targeted outreach to vulnerable populations, such as slum residents and outdoor workers, and suggests integrating heat warnings into existing disease surveillance systems.

The Union of Concerned Scientists reports that cities in the US Midwest have experienced an increase in heat waves and dangerously hot, humid days over the last six decades. Analysis of ten cities, including St. Louis, Chicago, Detroit, and the Twin Cities, shows a rise in the frequency of heat waves and a corresponding loss of cool, comfortable summer days. These trends increase the risk of hyperthermia and dehydration, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly, children, and those with pre-existing medical conditions. The document advocates for city-level preparedness and the reduction of fossil fuel emissions to mitigate these health risks.

The report finds that dangerously hot summer days and heat waves have become more common in the US Midwest since the 1940s and 1950s. It highlights that nighttime temperatures have risen, reducing the cooling relief necessary to prevent heat-related illness. The analysis, covering 10 cities, indicates that these trends are not solely due to urban heat island effects, as smaller cities showed similar increases. Future projections suggest a significant increase in days over 90°F and 100°F by the end of the century if high carbon emissions continue.

The report finds that the US Midwest has experienced a significant increase in dangerously hot and humid summer days since the 1940s and 1950s. This trend increases the risk of heat-related illnesses and deaths, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly, children, and urban residents. The analysis, covering 10 cities across eight states, indicates that rising nighttime temperatures and more frequent heat waves exacerbate health risks. Projections suggest that without significant carbon emission reductions, the region will face a substantial increase in days exceeding 90°F and 100°F by the end of the century.

The report finds that the U.S. Midwest has experienced a significant increase in dangerously hot, humid, and dry summer days, as well as more frequent heat waves, over the last 60 years. Analysis of ten cities indicates that nighttime temperatures and humidity are rising, reducing the relief typically found overnight. These trends are linked to higher risks of hyperthermia and dehydration, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and low-income urban residents. The document argues for a combination of local adaptation strategies, such as heat-response plans and cooling centers, and aggressive global action to reduce fossil fuel emissions to mitigate future extreme heat events.

The document examines 60 years of summer weather data in the US Midwest, finding that hot and humid air masses are becoming more frequent while cooler air masses are declining. Analysis of both large cities and smaller rural counterparts suggests these trends are driven by broader climate change rather than solely by urban heat island effects, with nighttime temperatures warming faster than daytime temperatures.

The document outlines how human-induced climate change has increased the probability of intense heat waves, severe droughts, and large forest fires in the U.S., citing data from NOAA and other scientific bodies to show that these events are becoming more frequent and severe than natural variability alone can explain.

The document argues that public health professionals have an ethical obligation to communicate the health risks of climate change, as there is a significant disconnect between professional knowledge and public awareness. It recommends framing climate change as a human health problem rather than an environmental one, localizing the issue to make it concrete, and emphasizing 'win-win' health co-benefits of mitigation actions. The guide identifies key target audiences, including journalists, government decision-makers, and vulnerable populations, and suggests specific outreach methods such as using opinion leaders, issuing local scientific reports, and testifying at government hearings.