Search Climate Insights Directory

The document is a letter from ClientEarth and a coalition of NGOs to the Council Presidency and Member States, warning that the proposed recast of Regulation 1049/2001 could undermine transparency and violate international standards, including the Aarhus Convention. While welcoming the extension of rules to all EU bodies and proactive publication of legislative documents, the authors criticize several proposals: a restrictive definition of 'document', the introduction of 'block exceptions' for certain classes of documents, a presumption that transparency undermines legal advice, and the allowance of national exceptions. They also argue that new exceptions for staff selection and contracts increase corruption risks, that privacy protections lack a proper public interest balance, and that proposed time limits for requests (up to 80 working days) are excessive. Finally, the letter criticizes the closed nature of the 'trialogue' negotiation process.

The document is an annotated bibliography covering various scholarly and policy works on multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs). It examines themes of compliance, accountability, and the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance. A significant portion of the text analyzes the 'interplay' between MEAs and the WTO, noting how trade restrictions can either 'chill' environmental negotiations or serve as effective enforcement tools, as seen in the Montreal Protocol. It also details the specific compliance mechanisms of the Kyoto Protocol, CITES, and the Basel Convention, while highlighting the challenges of climate finance and the need for transparency in the EU's financial commitments to developing countries.

The external review assesses WRI's transition toward a more global presence, specifically its expansion into China, India, and Brazil, and its shift toward a 'do-tank' model. While praising WRI's analytical excellence, reputation, and successful engagement with the business sector, the review identifies needs for better program focus, increased attention to poverty and gender, and a more systematic approach to partnership management. It recommends that WRI refine its balance between strategic research and tactical implementation to maintain its comparative advantage as a high-impact global think tank.

The author identifies three failures of 'first wave' environmentalism: a failure to establish the relative urgency of environmental crises compared to immediate economic crises, the lack of a convincing narrative on growth in Agenda 21, and the tendency for environmental agendas to be managed by environmental ministers rather than economic development ministers. While the author praises the UN Secretary General's High Level Panel report for addressing these issues through recommendations on fiscal policy and a sustainable economy, he warns that the 'zero draft' of the Rio+20 outcome document remains largely aspirational and risks falling back into the 'environmental trap'.

The document examines the historical evolution of the link between human rights and the environment across UN conferences and argues that the Rio+20 process, specifically its 'Zero Draft' outcome document, fails to adequately operationalize this linkage. It suggests that a rights-based approach is essential to prevent the 'green economy' theme from eclipsing social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. The brief recommends that Rio+20 explicitly recognize the right to a healthy environment, integrate this right into the mandates of new environmental organizations or the Ombudsman for Future Generations, and pursue a global or regional treaty to elaborate on the procedural rights of access to information, public participation, and access to justice as outlined in Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) argues that the South African Weather Service Amendment Bill, 2011, introduces problematic penalties for issuing air pollution-related warnings without permission. CER contends this could criminalise independent air quality monitoring and contradict existing protections in the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA). They propose removing the 'air pollution-related warning' offence and explicitly aligning the Weather Service's objectives with the Constitution and NEMA.

The document examines how community protocols and FPIC processes empower indigenous and local communities to protect their land, resources, and traditional knowledge. Through various case studies in countries such as India, Peru, Ghana, and Cameroon, it argues that these tools are most effective when they are bottom-up processes designed and controlled by the communities themselves rather than imposed top-down by governments or corporations. The report highlights the role of the Nagoya Protocol and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in providing international legal support for these tools, while noting that national implementation often remains inadequate.

The World Resources Institute (WRI) reported total revenue of $39,871,632 and total expenses of $37,145,082 for the 2009 tax year. Its primary mission is to "MOVE HUMAN SOCIETY TO LIVE IN WAYS THAT PROTECT EARTH'S ENVIRONMENT". The organization operates several key programs focusing on climate, energy, pollution, ecosystem degradation, and urban mobility, with significant grantmaking and program activities conducted both within the United States and internationally, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia, and South America.

The report finds that while civil society usage of PAIA for strategic advocacy has increased, the performance of information holders has declined, characterized by a high rate of 'deemed refusals' and a lack of affordable appeal mechanisms.

The Centre for Environmental Rights and a coalition of environmental NGOs are urging the South African government to use legislative powers to prohibit mining in areas of critical biodiversity and hydrological value. They offer to provide scientific evidence and a list of sensitive areas to assist a government task team in improving environmental compliance and sustainable development in the mining sector.

The document examines the tension between rapid economic transition and environmental degradation in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). It highlights how trade liberalization and infrastructure development, such as economic corridors and hydropower projects, have contributed to soil erosion and illegal wildlife and timber trade. While regional frameworks like the ASEAN Regional Action Plan on Trade in Wild Fauna and Flora and the Singapore Declaration on Climate Change exist, the report argues they are often non-binding 'soft law' and lack enforcement capacity. It specifically notes that climate change is expected to increase basin-wide temperatures by 0.79C and flooding by 2030. The author recommends that GMS countries coordinate conservation laws, establish a unified greenhouse gas inventory system, and subject trading mechanisms to formal climate risk assessments to move beyond 'token commitments'.

The project developed the Local Knowledge Scenarios (LKS) method, which integrates field work and Agent-Based Models to document local perceptions of environmental change and their impact on decision-making. Testing across five diverse American regions revealed that local awareness of issues like deforestation in the Amazon does not always translate to the acceptance of environmental laws, and that fishing communities in Canada require national public policies to successfully diversify their income sources.

The report identifies significant distrust and dissatisfaction among stakeholders regarding Estonia's environmental impact assessment (EIA) and strategic environmental assessment (SEA) processes. Key issues include the perceived lack of independence of experts hired by developers, the incompetence of decision-makers (local governments), and a general decline in the protection of public interests. The study suggests that the system requires refinement, particularly in integrating SEA with planning processes and increasing the leading role of decision-makers to ensure objectivity and the protection of non-market values.

The Environmental Management Framework Regulations, 2010, establish the legal process for creating, adopting, and using environmental management frameworks (EMFs) in South Africa. These frameworks are designed to map environmental attributes and guide land-use decisions to promote sustainability and environmental protection.

The report examines the effects of the 2009 formation of the Estonian Environmental Board on nature conservation. Survey results from 84 officials indicate a significant increase in bureaucracy and office work, with 83% reporting an increase in office workload. While the general reputation of nature conservation remained largely stable, officials expressed concerns over the lack of on-site supervision and unclear role divisions between the Environmental Board and the State Forest Management Centre (RMK). Most respondents believe their work will become more complex and important in the future, though they feel a lack of sufficient legal and societal support.

The document examines the complexities of 'doing participation' in environmental governance, arguing that effective engagement requires moving beyond 'tick-box' exercises to a holistic approach that accounts for power dynamics, social-ecological contexts, and the integration of scientific and local knowledge. It presents various case studies and methodologies, such as Q methodology for stakeholder selection and adaptive co-management frameworks, to address the tensions between representative democracy and deliberative practices.

The SEI Strategy 2010-2014 establishes a framework for the institute to act as a leading provider of systems understanding and policy solutions for sustainable development. The strategy reorganizes research into four multidisciplinary themes: managing environmental systems, reducing climate risk, transforming governance, and rethinking development. SEI aims to increase its institutional core funding to 40% by 2014 to enhance strategic flexibility and independence. The institute leverages a distributed structure of research centres across Africa, Asia, Europe, and the USA to link global expertise with local implementation, specifically targeting the needs of poor regions and the development of leadership capacities in the South.

The document outlines the tension between addressing current global development challenges—such as hunger and water scarcity—and preparing for future climate-related disruptions. It highlights projected temperature increases and specific risks to Asia's water and food security, posing a central policy question on how to allocate limited resources between present needs and future resilience.

The document examines the intersection of environmental governance and climate change in Africa, highlighting the continent's high vulnerability due to low adaptive capacity and 'multiple stresses'. It analyzes specific case studies on land degradation and gender in Uganda, informal institutions in the Lake Victoria Basin, and renewable energy policies in Nigeria and Uganda. It further critiques the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) from an African perspective, suggesting reforms to increase participation and sustainable development. Finally, it argues for a human rights-based approach to climate mitigation and adaptation to protect the most vulnerable populations.

The document highlights how two decades of conflict in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have created a humanitarian crisis and severely threatened Virunga National Park. It argues that the illegal trade in park resources, specifically charcoal, funds violence and leads to deforestation, while the displacement of populations increases pressure on the ecosystem. The author contends that environmental governance must be integrated into any peace agreements to prevent natural resources from continuing to finance conflict and to support future economic recovery.