HUMAN RIGHTS & ENVIRONMENT IN THE RIO+20 UN CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document examines the historical evolution of the link between human rights and the environment across UN conferences and argues that the Rio+20 process, specifically its 'Zero Draft' outcome document, fails to adequately operationalize this linkage. It suggests that a rights-based approach is essential to prevent the 'green economy' theme from eclipsing social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. The brief recommends that Rio+20 explicitly recognize the right to a healthy environment, integrate this right into the mandates of new environmental organizations or the Ombudsman for Future Generations, and pursue a global or regional treaty to elaborate on the procedural rights of access to information, public participation, and access to justice as outlined in Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • The 1972 Stockholm Declaration was the first international instrument to explicitly link human rights and environmental protection, asserting that humans have a fundamental right to an environment of a quality that allows for dignity and well-being.
  • Subsequent UN conferences, including the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio and the 2002 World Sustainable Development Summit in Johannesburg, failed to explicitly recognize a right to the environment, with the 1992 Rio Declaration using the language of 'entitlement' instead.
  • There is a risk that the 'green economy' theme of Rio+20 may overshadow the social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development and the need for institutional governance reform.
  • The January 2012 'Zero Draft' of the Rio+20 outcome document, 'The Future We Want', is criticized for not recognizing the fundamental right to a healthy environment and for containing only minimal references to human rights.
  • Effective environmental governance depends on procedural rights—specifically access to information, public participation, and access to justice—which are exemplified by the Aarhus Convention.
  • The document recommends that the right to a healthy environment be explicitly recognized as a duty of states for both present and future generations and be integrated into the mandate of the Ombudsman for Future Generations.

Cite the original document

APA
Center for International Environmental Law (2012). HUMAN RIGHTS & ENVIRONMENT IN THE RIO+20 UN CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Rio-20_IssueBrief_Feb2012.pdf
Chicago
Center for International Environmental Law. HUMAN RIGHTS & ENVIRONMENT IN THE RIO+20 UN CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. 2012. https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Rio-20_IssueBrief_Feb2012.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Center for International Environmental Law |title=HUMAN RIGHTS & ENVIRONMENT IN THE RIO+20 UN CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT |date=15 February 2012 |url=https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Rio-20_IssueBrief_Feb2012.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{centerforinternationalenvironmentallaw2012human, author = {{Center for International Environmental Law}}, title = {{HUMAN RIGHTS \& ENVIRONMENT IN THE RIO+20 UN CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT}}, institution = {Center for International Environmental Law}, year = {2012}, month = feb, url = {https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Rio-20_IssueBrief_Feb2012.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated