Search Climate Insights Directory

The document defines vertical integration in the context of National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) as the creation of strategic links between national and subnational levels of climate adaptation. It argues that involving subnational actors—including local authorities, organizations, and communities—is essential for integrating climate adaptation into policies and supporting vulnerable groups. The process relies on three key enabling factors: institutional agreements, information exchange, and capacity development. Furthermore, the text highlights that existing national decentralization efforts provide a critical foundation for this integration, as they establish the necessary mechanisms for transferring resources and decision-making power to the lowest feasible administrative level.

The document defines vertical integration as the process of linking national and sub-national adaptation planning to ensure that climate considerations are integrated across all levels of government. It identifies three essential factors for success: institutional arrangements, information sharing, and capacity building. The text emphasizes that decentralization provides a critical foundation for this integration by delegating power and resources to the local level, where climate risks are most localized. It argues that an effective NAP process requires a mix of top-down and bottom-up approaches, necessitating collaboration between national coordinators, sub-national authorities, and local communities.

The document defines Vertical Integration as the strategic linking of national and sub-national efforts in climate adaptation. It emphasizes that this process ensures adaptation considerations are integrated across all levels of government and society, leveraging local expertise to support vulnerable groups. The text identifies institutional frameworks, information sharing, and capacity development as the three key drivers of this integration. It further explains that while decentralization provides a strong foundation for Vertical Integration by shifting decision-making closer to citizens, countries with less advanced decentralization must find alternative ways to engage sub-national actors.

The document outlines a comprehensive framework for financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes, distinguishing between the lower-cost 'development phase' (planning and coordination) and the high-cost 'implementation phase' (execution of adaptation actions). It identifies four primary funding streams: national public finance (budgets, fiscal instruments, and national climate funds), bilateral providers (grants and technical assistance), multilateral funds (such as the Green Climate Fund and Adaptation Fund), and the private sector (through direct investment and public-private partnerships). The guide emphasizes the necessity of a tailored financing strategy that identifies funding gaps, determines appropriate financial instruments, and establishes operational steps to align national adaptation priorities with available resources.

The document outlines a strategic framework for financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes, distinguishing between the 'elaboration phase' (planning and coordination) and the 'execution phase' (implementation of priority measures). It identifies four primary funding streams: domestic public revenues, bilateral providers, multilateral funds, and the private sector. While elaboration is typically funded by public and bilateral grants, the more costly execution phase requires a diversified mix of public and private capital. The brief recommends that countries develop a dedicated NAP financing strategy that identifies funding gaps, determines appropriate financial instruments, and defines operational steps to improve access to resources.

The document outlines the need for climate information services to build agricultural resilience in Rwanda and describes a USAID-funded project aiming to benefit nearly one million farmers by 2019 through improved climate risk management.

The briefing highlights how small businesses, specifically domestic seed companies, support climate risk management (CRM) in developing countries. It recommends that these companies improve decision-making regarding seed choices, increase knowledge of climate-resilient varieties, and strengthen distribution and quality control systems. Additionally, it suggests that development practitioners support these efforts through infrastructure improvements, capacity building on climate risk integration, and facilitating access to climate finance, while researchers should investigate small businesses as climate knowledge brokers.

The document examines the role of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in enhancing climate resilience within agricultural value chains, using a case study of Equator Seeds in northern Uganda. It argues that small businesses can reduce climate vulnerability for suppliers and clients by providing climate-resilient seed varieties, complementary training services, and flexible financial arrangements. The analysis identifies key investment priorities for seed companies, including improving informed decision-making for farmers, raising awareness of improved seed varieties, and strengthening quality control systems to combat counterfeit seeds. It concludes with recommendations for practitioners and researchers to improve the enabling environment, enhance MSME capacity to use climate information, and facilitate access to climate finance.

The proposed programme aims to transition Rwanda's agriculture sector toward a low-carbon, climate-resilient model by mainstreaming adaptation and mitigation into national policies and the Strategic Plan for the Transformation of Agriculture (PSTA-4). With a requested grant of 30 million USD, the initiative focuses on implementing climate-smart pilots, building institutional capacity, and creating an enabling environment to overcome economic and policy barriers. The programme targets the agriculture sector, which is responsible for 78% of Rwanda's total greenhouse gas emissions and is highly vulnerable to climate variability, including floods and droughts.

The document examines the intersection of financial services and climate risk management (CRM) in Uganda's rice value chains. It focuses on the role of the Centenary Bank in Eastern Uganda, exploring how financial service providers can enable CRM for value chain actors and proposing a framework of core functions for such management. The text aims to provide practical options and recommended actions for researchers and practitioners to enhance climate resilience and food security in developing countries.

The document examines the intersection of agricultural finance and climate risk management (CRM) through a case study of Centenary Bank's operations in Eastern Uganda. It highlights how climate hazards like floods and droughts disrupt the entire rice value chain, increasing loan default rates for banks while threatening farmer livelihoods. The research identifies that while existing savings and credit services provide some buffers and allow for income diversification, there is a need for more tailored products, such as preferential interest rates for CRM strategies and improved climate information services, to enhance resilience for both value chain actors and financial providers.

The document outlines a framework for climate risk management (CRM) within agricultural value chains, specifically drawing on research regarding the rice sector in Uganda. It emphasizes the necessity of identifying core CRM functions and the role of service providers—such as domestic seed companies providing climate-resilient varieties and financial institutions like Centenary Bank—in protecting investments and enhancing the resilience of actors throughout the value chain against climate hazards.

The document argues that private sector engagement is essential for scaling up climate compatible development in Bangladesh due to public budget constraints and the private sector's own exposure to climate risks. While the Green Climate Fund (GCF) provides financial opportunities, the private sector is hindered by information gaps, capacity constraints, and limited access to low-cost finance.

The briefing argues that for agricultural value chain investments to be sustainable, climate resilience must be a priority, requiring all actors to perform three core CRM functions: climate risk assessment, adaptive management, and responding to shocks. Using the Ugandan rice sector as an example, it demonstrates that while all actors are exposed to climate hazards like droughts and floods, smallholder farmers are the most vulnerable due to limited assets. The document emphasizes the critical role of service providers—offering climate information, financial services, market data, and resilient infrastructure—in enabling these CRM functions. It concludes by recommending that development agencies integrate CRM into training, strengthen service provider capacities, generate economic evidence for the business case of CRM, and align agricultural policies with systemic risk management.

The document argues that engaging the private sector is critical for scaling up climate adaptation and mitigation in Bangladesh due to high costs and public budgetary constraints. While the private sector is already pursuing market opportunities—such as climate-resilient seeds and solar home systems—significant barriers remain, including information gaps, weak financial markets, and policy constraints. The Green Climate Fund (GCF), specifically its Private Sector Facility (PSF), is presented as a key mechanism to overcome these barriers by providing low-cost finance and support for SMEs. The brief recommends that the Government of Bangladesh develop a clear roadmap for private sector involvement in climate policy and integrate climate considerations into public procurement.

The CRiSTAL Parks User's Manual describes a desktop application that enables conservation managers to identify and prioritize climate risks to Protected Areas (PAs) and the communities that depend on them. The tool uses a three-module framework to understand the conservation and climate context, evaluate implications for management plans, and support monitoring and evaluation. It emphasizes a participatory approach, combining desk-based research with stakeholder workshops to identify 'conservation objects' and the ecosystem services they provide to local livelihoods. By screening existing activities and designing new adaptation measures, the tool aims to increase the resilience of both ecosystems and human communities to climate variability and change.

The manual describes the CRiSTAL Parques tool, which focuses on the links between human communities and protected areas to identify climate risks and design adaptation activities. It outlines a three-module process: understanding the conservation and climate context, evaluating implications for management plans, and supporting monitoring and evaluation. The tool emphasizes participatory methods, such as stakeholder workshops, to identify 'conservation objects' and the ecosystem services they provide to local livelihoods.

The report advocates for a shift from 'science-first' to 'policy-first' (or 'decision-first') adaptation methods, which prioritise development objectives and immediate policy windows over purely model-driven impact assessments. This approach is illustrated through a case study in Rwanda, where climate information was integrated into the Agriculture Sector Investment Plan (ASIP2) specifically for the tea and coffee sectors. The process involved identifying policy entry points, assessing current and future climate risks—such as rising temperatures and rainfall variability—and sequencing interventions into low-regret options, land-use planning, and early planning for future risks like pests and diseases. The report emphasises that for adaptation to be successful, it must be linked to specific financing sources, such as Rwanda's national climate and environment fund (FONERWA), and include iterative evaluation and learning mechanisms.

The Overseas Development Institute (ODI) outlines ten critical considerations for financing development in the context of climate change, emphasizing that climate action can enhance development outcomes. Key points include the potential for $5 trillion in transport spending to improve energy efficiency, the falling costs of clean energy, and the role of forest protection and climate-resilient agriculture in supporting livelihoods and ending hunger. The document also notes that disasters currently cost $100 billion annually, that financial institutions are beginning to manage climate risk, and that increased climate finance should not reduce aid for poor countries.

The FCFA Zambia pilot study found that climate information is not currently used for long-term planning or infrastructure decisions in Zambia. While there is high demand for high-resolution projections, decision-makers often overlook the associated uncertainty. The brief recommends investing in 'adaptation ready' science, creating institutional incentives for collaboration between scientists and planners, and adopting interactive engagement methods like gamification to build trust and improve data flow. It also advocates for open data systems to break down departmental silos and the implementation of forecast-based financing to trigger early action before climate disasters occur.