Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that non-state actors—including cities, companies, and non-profits—can provide independent expertise and accountability to strengthen the Paris Agreement's review mechanisms. It specifically examines the enhanced transparency framework, the implementation and compliance mechanism, and the global stocktake, suggesting that formalizing the role of non-state actors through public access, written submissions, and oral interventions would improve the effectiveness of these processes.

The document examines the operationalization of the Paris Agreement's enhanced transparency framework, focusing on the need for 'built-in flexibility' for developing countries, the transition from existing UNFCCC reporting systems, and the integration of transparency data into the global stocktake. It highlights critical gaps in climate finance accounting and the necessity of sustainable funding for the Capacity-building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT) to ensure all Parties can meet reporting requirements by 2018.

The SEI Initiative on Climate Services focuses on creating a Participatory Framework for Climate Services (PFCS) to better connect climate science with the practical needs of users, ranging from national governments to smallholder farmers. The initiative is structured around four work packages: understanding user needs, exploring collaborative co-generation processes, improving communication methodologies, and developing a community learning space via the weADAPT platform. It draws on interdisciplinary research and case studies from both industrialized and developing countries to ensure climate information is timely, relevant, and accessible.

The President of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) has designated Ms. Sihna N. Lawrence, the Secretary of Finance & Administration, as the new National Designated Authority (NDA) for the Green Climate Fund, replacing Mr. Kensley K. Ikosia. The document acknowledges a $300,000 GCF Readiness & Support Grant intended to strengthen the FSM's capacity to access GCF programs and resources, noting that FSM is the first among Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to receive such an initiation grant.

The report examines Project PN714, an intervention to improve supply chain management (SCM) in a provincial education department in South Africa. The project employed a combination of 'rapid results' (RRI), 'action-learning', and the twinning of technical support with culture change facilitation. While the project faced significant obstacles at the Head Office level—including leadership instability, political interference, and a lack of senior management buy-in—it achieved observable successes at the District Office and school levels. Specifically, procurement processes in the District Office improved, and the administration of the School Nutrition Programme in eight pilot schools was enhanced. The report concludes that in highly politicised and dysfunctional environments, identifying 'spaces of professionalism' and using an iterative, adaptive approach is more effective than conventional top-down technical interventions.

The briefing advocates for the Paris agreement to establish a global goal for adaptation to strengthen international cooperation and resilience. It proposes an 'adaptation cycle' consisting of regular national adaptation communications and a global stock-take every five years to identify gaps and mobilize support. The author emphasizes that this process should minimize the burden on developing countries by utilizing existing planning frameworks like National Adaptation Plans.

The preparation of intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) has acted as a catalyst for national climate change mitigation action and policy making. Evidence from surveys and interviews indicates that the international process has driven significant developments in national capacity and potential mitigation actions for the period before 2020 for most countries, independent of the specific ambition levels proposed for post-2020 actions.

The document identifies critical priorities for the GCF Board meeting in Zambia, emphasizing the need for 'paradigm-shifting' project approvals and a better balance between national and international implementing entities. It argues for increased transparency in the accreditation and proposal process and the urgent establishment of a Strategic Plan to manage the $10 billion in committed funds.

The paper explores the analogy between transitional justice—typically used to transition societies from periods of deep injustice to peace—and the climate change context. It identifies four key similarities: unavoidable interdependence, the inadequacy of current judicial processes, disagreements over the link between past actions and future obligations, and the importance of socio-economic human rights. The author suggests that climate policy could adopt specific transitional justice practices, such as guarantees of non-recurrence, reparations, limited liability, and formal peace processes, to move beyond political stalemates regarding historical responsibility. However, the paper also notes significant limitations, including the fact that climate injustices are ongoing rather than past, the lack of a unified global 'society', and the risk of co-optation by powerful actors.

The Global Climate Policy Conference 2015 explored innovative research-driven approaches to climate action, focusing on the intersection of development, adaptation, carbon pricing, and state accountability. Key discussions highlighted the need for a 'club' approach to carbon pricing and technology, the importance of microfinance and local capacity in adaptation, and the role of basic energy research in breaking the link between emissions and economic growth.

The report identifies a significant gap in tracking private finance for climate adaptation, noting that less than 10% of publicly-mobilized private climate finance is directed toward adaptation. It proposes four methodological approaches—ranging from 'Direct' to 'Indirect Expanded'—to better capture how public interventions, including those providing enabling outputs like capacity building, trigger private investment. Through case studies in Northern Uganda and the African Risk Capacity, the authors demonstrate that relying solely on direct co-financing data leads to underestimations of mobilization. The report concludes that while indirect mobilization is harder to measure and carries higher risks of double counting, tracking it is essential to incentivize the upstream public support necessary for climate resilience.

The report addresses the difficulty in tracking private finance for climate adaptation, noting that it currently represents less than 10% of total mobilized private climate finance. It proposes four methodological approaches—ranging from direct co-finance to expanded indirect mobilization—and tests them using two case studies: the NU-TEC project in Northern Uganda and the African Risk Capacity (ARC) insurance mechanism. The findings highlight a trade-off between the accuracy and incentive potential of a method and its practicality and standardization potential. The authors conclude that relying solely on direct co-finance underestimates the impact of 'enabling' interventions like technical assistance and capacity building.

The document outlines three primary models for initiating sectoral integration of climate adaptation: sector-driven, national-driven, and mixed approaches. It emphasizes that while paths vary by national context, a strong coordination function is essential across all models to ensure coherence and avoid duplication of efforts.

The document argues that urban GHG mitigation is most effective when governments at different levels operate according to their comparative advantages. It categorizes city roles into policy leaders, critical implementers, and strategic partners, mapping these roles to specific abatement potentials in transport, buildings, and waste. The authors emphasize that national governments must provide enabling actions—specifically financial support, technical capacity, and policy alignment—to unlock this potential. Case studies of China, the United States, and Brazil illustrate varying degrees of vertical integration and identify specific national-level gaps that hinder city-scale climate action.

The document evaluates the Green Climate Fund's (GCF) current standing by analyzing its strengths, such as its international credibility and USD 10 billion in pledges, against internal challenges like a lengthy decision-making cycle and a lack of defined portfolio targets. It draws comparative lessons from other climate funds (GEF, AF, CIFs) and global health funds (GAVI, Global Fund), suggesting that a 'vertical programmatic approach' could help mobilize stakeholders around tangible results. Key recommendations include strengthening country ownership through readiness support, standardizing investment criteria to improve comparability, and leveraging the Private Sector Facility to potentially become a leading green bond fund.

The report examines climate change impacts in the Karamoja region of Uganda through case studies of three villages: Oryeotyene North ward (agricultural zone), Nakayot (agro-pastoralist zone), and Lopedot (pastoral zone). It finds that recent droughts and floods have caused production losses of 50% to 100% for many households, with the 2014 drought being particularly severe. The study estimates that without adaptation, future extreme events could lead to significant losses in crop and livestock value by 2050, while long-term temperature and rainfall trends may reduce yields for maize and beans. Livestock is identified as providing greater resilience than crops, as animals can be moved to other regions during crises. Recommended adaptation priorities include improving water availability, capacity building, and crop diversification.

The document examines the role of technical assistance (TA) in mobilizing climate finance, arguing that TA can be as valuable as financial assistance by addressing knowledge, policy, and risk gaps. Through case studies of GIZ programs in Chile, Mexico, Vietnam, and the Pacific Islands, it identifies five key TA pathways: policy advice, project development support, data provision, program coordination, and institutional capacity building. The analysis estimates that GIZ-managed TA funding of €43 million mobilized between €37-233 million in public finance and up to €412 million in private finance, though it notes high uncertainty in quantifying indirect mobilization due to time lags and complex causality.

The document outlines the goals of COP 21, specifically the adoption of a new international climate agreement to limit global temperature increases to 2°C. It describes the role of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) in setting greenhouse gas targets and identifies critical negotiation areas including adaptation, loss and damage, climate finance, technology transfer, and capacity building in developing countries.

The CDKN-ICLEI First Learning Workshop in Quito, Ecuador, brought together 51 participants from 16 projects to identify enablers and barriers to sub-national climate compatible development (CCD). The workshop focused on moving from planning to implementation, resulting in a revised set of assumptions about effective CCD and the identification of critical knowledge gaps in planning, scaling, and conceptualisation. These outcomes informed seven core learning questions that project partners will address through the creation of 'Inside Stories'—reflective, evidence-based analyses of their learning processes. Regional discussions highlighted that in Asia, CCD is often framed as 'climate-smart' or 'climate-friendly' and requires strong links to poverty alleviation and gender issues, while in Latin America and the Caribbean, local framing and political will are seen as key drivers for sustainability.

The NAP Global Network is a practitioner-oriented group established in December 2014 to coordinate bilateral official development assistance (ODA) for National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) in developing countries. It focuses on bridging the gap between bilateral donors and in-country actors to ensure climate adaptation support aligns with national development priorities. The Network provides peer learning through Targeted Topics Forums (TTFs) and acts as a liaison to avoid duplication of efforts among donors. It distinguishes itself from other initiatives by specifically targeting bilateral support, which the document notes constituted USD 11.28 billion in adaptation-related ODA in 2013, significantly more than multilateral support.