Search Climate Insights Directory

The report analyzes the New PAC's infrastructure plans for the Amazon, finding a disconnect between project distribution and actual regional needs. It highlights contradictions between the program's green growth discourse and its inclusion of high-impact projects like the Ferrogrão railroad and BR-319 highway, as well as investments in natural gas power plants. The authors argue that the New PAC lacks transparency and fails to align with the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon (PPCDAM). Recommendations include creating a comprehensive regional development plan, prioritizing infrastructure in the 'Deforested Amazon', and shifting energy investments toward solar and wind power.

The document outlines strategies for public development banks (PDBs) to enhance climate finance, focusing on Paris alignment, public-public collaborations, and private capital mobilization. It emphasizes the need for a bottom-up approach to ensure national ownership and the use of de-risking tools like guarantees to close investment gaps in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs). Key recommendations include improving transparency in alignment assessments, expanding concessional funding for national development banks (NDBs), and supporting just energy transitions through the early retirement of coal plants.

The document analyzes how international agreements, regional legislation, and industry competition hinder the removal of fossil fuel subsidies in aviation and shipping. It argues that while fuel taxation is often restricted by bilateral agreements or regional directives like the EU's Energy Taxation Directive, emissions levies through the ICAO and IMO offer viable pathways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fund the transition to sustainable fuels.

The document advocates for a 'deep' just transition in African food systems that prioritizes human rights, structural equity, and agroecology over industrialization. It highlights the vulnerabilities of African food systems to climate change and the risks of 'modernization' policies that favor agribusiness. Using South Africa's highly unequal, industrial food system as a cautionary example, the brief recommends that philanthropies shift toward long-term, flexible funding for multi-actor coalitions, grassroots initiatives, and participatory research to foster systemic change.

The report argues that multilateral development banks (MDBs) are critical for shifting the infrastructure sector—which accounts for 79% of global greenhouse gas emissions—toward low-carbon practices. While MDBs are increasingly integrating sustainability into procurement policies, they face obstacles such as the limited capacity of borrowing countries and varying market readiness. The document recommends that MDBs expand capacity-building, improve monitoring systems, and facilitate technology transfer to accelerate the decarbonization of global supply chains.

The document argues that while the AfCFTA Digital Trade Protocol provides a strategic framework for interoperability, its success depends on member states overcoming 'digital exclusion', characterized by a significant rural-urban divide where rural internet penetration is only 23% compared to 57% in urban areas. To facilitate implementation, the author recommends a tiered approach of 'foundational' and 'catalytic' measures. Foundational steps include investing in broadband, establishing data protection laws, and improving digital literacy. Catalytic steps involve offering incentives for tech startups, supporting local e-commerce platforms, and developing specialized training for MSMEs. The brief specifically suggests that member states amend domestic regulations to allow satellite services like Starlink to mitigate terrestrial connectivity deficits and modernize banking regulations to accommodate fintech. It also warns that the protocol's suggestion to develop rules of origin for digitally delivered services (DDS) departs from the WTO e-commerce moratorium and may be 'costly and prejudicial to businesses'.

The report outlines five key steps for developing financial instruments for climate adaptation: defining a clear resilience thesis, building pipelines with predictable cash flows, strategically structuring risk and returns through blended capital, cultivating local collaborations, and implementing robust impact measurement. It notes that while The Global Innovation Lab for Climate Finance has supported over 20 adaptation-focused instruments mobilizing more than $1.2 billion, the sector still faces challenges including high perceived risk, limited investor awareness, and difficulties in pricing climate risk.

A joint statement by Ecojustice, the David Suzuki Foundation, the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Breast Cancer Action Quebec, and Environmental Defence criticizing the proposed Watch List approach under CEPA for being overly complex. The organizations advocate for a hazard-based listing process that bypasses risk assessments and public consultations to avoid industry lobbying and delays, urging publication by Spring 2025.

The policy brief argues that current menstrual health policies often oversimplify sustainability by focusing solely on the waste generated by disposable products. It recommends that policymakers adopt a comprehensive framework that considers local contexts, the impact of climate change on water accessibility, the need for standardized product quality, and the socio-economic barriers that influence product choice and disposal practices.

Carbon Market Watch argues that the EU's net carbon sink is declining rapidly and that the current LULUCF Regulation contains loopholes, such as offsetting flexibility and reliance on forest biomass, that undermine climate goals. The organization recommends removing offsetting mechanisms, preventing double counting between national inventories and corporate claims under the Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF), limiting forest harvesting for bioenergy, and strengthening synergies between LULUCF targets and the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) and Nature Restoration Law.

The document highlights a gap between Africa's high climate vulnerability and the volume of its media coverage, particularly from international sources. It identifies key barriers for local journalists, including insufficient funding, restricted data access, and safety concerns. To improve reporting, the authors recommend shifting from crisis-driven narratives to those highlighting local agency and Indigenous knowledge, while calling for international partnerships and capacity-building investments.

Ember's briefing evaluates the EU's current grid policy framework, which includes the Grid Action Plan and revised Electricity Market Design. While identifying over 80 action points for implementation, the analysis highlights risks regarding the lack of target dates for many Commission-led actions and underutilised funding for Distribution System Operators (DSOs). To address these gaps, Ember recommends establishing a "Future Grids" Task Force for coordination, a one-stop-shop to simplify access to financing, and a Technical Toolbox to accelerate the digitalisation of distribution grids.

The document examines how preferential trade agreements (PTAs) can be designed to accelerate the green transition and influence WTO policy. It identifies three key areas for climate-focused provisions—fossil fuel subsidies, environmental goods and services, and investment protections—while noting that many current PTA provisions remain vague. The authors recommend focusing on win-win solutions, increasing non-state actor participation, boosting capacity building for low- and middle-income countries, improving impact assessments, and strengthening enforcement mechanisms. Finally, it suggests that PTAs can act as testing grounds for innovative rules that can later be multilateralized through WTO initiatives like the Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions (TESSD).

The document argues that the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) must address critical gaps in adaptation finance, which has lagged behind mitigation. It proposes specific requirements for the goal's quantum and instruments to ensure sufficiency, the support of transboundary cooperation for effectiveness, and improved allocation and access mechanisms to ensure equity. Additionally, it suggests enhancing the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) and Biennial Transparency Reports (BTRs) to improve accountability for both providers and recipients of adaptation funding.

The document examines the evolution of G20 debt management, from the 2008 financial crisis to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that global public debt reached $92 trillion in 2022. It critiques the Common Framework for Debt Treatments for slow implementation and proposes that South Africa's 2025 G20 presidency focus on strengthening this framework, establishing an African Debt Monitoring Mechanism, and enhancing debt transparency to support sustainable development goals.

The Council on Strategic Risks and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory propose a series of strategic actions to strengthen the United States' biomanufacturing capabilities for pandemic preparedness. Key recommendations include executing existing national biosecurity strategies, using federal procurement to create sustainable industry demand, leveraging the Defense Production Act and FDA processes, and establishing an Interagency Working Group on Biomanufacturing. The plan also emphasizes the need for improved pathogen early warning data sharing, supply chain resilience for medical countermeasures, and the expansion of technical education to include biomanufacturing skills.

The document argues that the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) must include a specific annual adaptation finance target of at least USD 215 billion, prioritizing public grants and concessional loans over non-concessional debt. To be effective, the goal should balance global, national, and local priorities, including support for locally led adaptation and transboundary climate risk management. For equity, the brief recommends prioritizing Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS), increasing funding for Indigenous Peoples and women, and simplifying access to finance through Direct Access and Enhanced Direct Access programs. It further suggests updating the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) in 2028 to improve accountability for both providers and recipients of adaptation finance.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) evaluated 38 federal agencies on their adherence to scientific integrity metrics, finding that 71% scored 'poor' or 'worst'. The report argues that political interference in science disproportionately harms underserved communities and proposes a blueprint for the next presidential administration to strengthen scientific integrity through better policy enforcement, transparency, and the integration of environmental justice principles.

A joint response from twelve NGOs urging the European Commission to adopt a fully precautionary, ecosystem-based approach to setting 2025 fishing opportunities, arguing that current Total Allowable Catches (TACs) fail to prioritise the rebuilding of depleted stocks and ignore critical ecosystem dynamics.

The document argues that Canada's Sustainable Jobs Act must intentionally advance Indigenous self-determination to address socio-economic inequities and the legacy of fossil fuel extraction. It proposes four action pathways: joint governance and co-design, supporting Indigenous-specific definitions of sustainable jobs, enabling Indigenous equity and ownership, and scaling up workforce capacity building. These recommendations are grounded in the experience of Indigenous Clean Energy (ICE) programs, such as the 20/20 Catalysts Program and Generation Power, which emphasize wrap-around supports and mentorship for Indigenous youth.