Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that talking about climate change is a critical individual action to normalize the topic and overcome the common misperception that others do not care about the issue. It provides a set of communication guidelines based on science and expert advice, emphasizing the use of shared values, personal stories, and empathetic listening over technical jargon or argumentative approaches. The guide highlights a gap in U.S. public perception, noting that while 63% of Americans are concerned about climate change, they believe only 43% share that concern, which often leads to silence and inaction.

The document outlines three positive framing strategies for COP30: highlighting the unstoppable momentum of renewable energy, depicting a cleaner and fairer future for children, and emphasizing the protection of natural environments. It advises against using politicized or intangible terms like 'net-zero' and 'growth', suggesting instead a focus on tangible benefits such as job creation, cheaper energy bills, and cleaner air. The guide also provides specific UK-based case studies and public opinion statistics to support these narratives.

The document outlines a communication toolkit for framing the transition to clean energy in the home as a collective societal effort rather than an individual burden. It emphasizes the use of solar power as a symbol of progress and provides tailored messaging for five specific UK audience segments: Progressive Activists, Incrementalist Lefts, Established Liberals, Rooted Patriots, and Traditional Conservatives. The guide advises against promising immediate financial savings and instead suggests highlighting existing progress, community benefits, and the protection of the British way of life.

The document advises communicators to frame net zero as a means to achieve a 'better future' with concrete benefits like cleaner air and good jobs, rather than defending it through statistics. It provides tailored messaging for five UK audience segments: Progressive Activists, Incrementalist Lefts, Established Liberals, Sceptical Scrollers, and Rooted Patriots, emphasizing local improvements, moral leadership, and the protection of British livelihoods and nature.

The BTC 2025 Communications Toolkit outlines best practices for public consultation on climate and nature, emphasizing transparency, accessibility, and the avoidance of 'tick box' exercises. It provides tailored messaging for seven distinct audience segments—ranging from Progressive Activists to Dissenting Disruptors—to ensure inclusive engagement and rebuild trust in institutions during the transition to net zero.

The document is a summary guide for UK campaigners focused on communicating about COP26 to increase public awareness. It argues that such awareness is necessary to motivate politicians toward ambitious decision-making and to encourage wider public engagement in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The document outlines a framework for discussing universal education and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) as climate solutions. It emphasizes that these interventions are synergistic and that centering gender equality and bodily autonomy is essential for effective climate mitigation and adaptation. The guide warns against oversimplifying these complexities or using coercive language regarding family size, arguing instead for a rights-based approach that addresses systemic oppression and empowers women and girls as agents of change.

The document argues that while 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming, a significant 'consensus gap' exists in public perception, largely driven by decades of deliberate misinformation campaigns. It identifies perceived consensus as a 'gateway belief' that influences support for climate policy and provides evidence-based communication strategies, such as 'weight-of-evidence' reporting and 'inoculation' against misinformation, to close this gap.

The document outlines five key strategies for communicating climate science: managing audience expectations about the scientific process, framing uncertainty as risk, focusing on established facts, emphasizing scientific consensus, and using visual storytelling.

The document argues that public health professionals have an ethical obligation to communicate the health risks of climate change, as there is a significant disconnect between professional knowledge and public awareness. It recommends framing climate change as a human health problem rather than an environmental one, localizing the issue to make it concrete, and emphasizing 'win-win' health co-benefits of mitigation actions. The guide identifies key target audiences, including journalists, government decision-makers, and vulnerable populations, and suggests specific outreach methods such as using opinion leaders, issuing local scientific reports, and testifying at government hearings.

The document argues that climate change is a profoundly ethical issue where the global North bears primary responsibility for emissions while the global South and marginalized groups suffer the most severe impacts. It advocates for 'climate justice'—a vision to alleviate unequal burdens through fair treatment and policies that address the structures creating inequality. The guide critiques market-based solutions like carbon trading and agrofuels, calling them 'false solutions' that allow rich nations to avoid responsibility. It highlights specific vulnerabilities, noting that women are disproportionately affected due to their roles in managing natural resources and limited access to decision-making. The text also introduces the Greenhouse Development Rights (GDRs) framework, which proposes a 'development threshold' to ensure the poor are not burdened by the costs of the climate transition. Finally, it provides practical advice for journalists to localize climate stories by amplifying the voices of the most vulnerable and comparing local environmental changes with global causes.

The document argues that broadcast meteorologists are uniquely positioned as trusted scientific sources to combat climate misinformation. It advocates for the use of 'psychological inoculation'—exposing audiences to misinformation techniques before they encounter them—and the 'Fact-Myth-Fallacy-Fact' structure to effectively educate the public. The guide details the FLICC taxonomy of science denial (fake experts, logical fallacies, impossible expectations, cherry picking, and conspiracy theories) and provides specific debunking scripts for ten common climate myths, such as the claim that the sun is the primary driver of current warming or that climate models are unreliable.

The guide equips National Park Service (NPS) staff to communicate climate change by segmenting the American public into six audience types based on their beliefs and motivations. It provides tailored communication tips for each group—ranging from the 'Alarmed' to the 'Dismissive'—and details specific climate impacts across ten U.S. bioregions to help staff create place-based narratives. The document emphasizes using local park stories and scientific consensus to motivate visitors toward climate action and energy conservation.

The document outlines essential communication tips for framing health and education as climate solutions. It emphasizes the intersection of gender equality, universal education, and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in mitigating climate change and poverty. Key guidance includes recognizing the disproportionate impact of climate change on women and girls in emerging economies, framing education as a basic human right, and advocating for full bodily autonomy without promoting coercive fertility limits.

The toolkit offers sample messaging and talking points to highlight how urban trees mitigate extreme heat, improve air quality, and enhance public health. It specifically promotes the #FundingUrbanForestry campaign and the use of Inflation Reduction Act funds to expand urban canopies and create green jobs in underserved communities.

The document provides a series of social media templates for Urban Forestry Grant awardees to promote the environmental, health, and economic benefits of urban tree planting. It highlights the role of urban forestry in mitigating extreme heat, improving air quality, and creating livable wage jobs, specifically targeting communities of color and low-income areas to promote tree equity.

The ABS Picture Box is an interactive communication tool designed for use in rural African contexts with low literacy levels to explain the complexities of Access and Benefit-sharing (ABS). Developed by the ABS Capacity Development Initiative and Natural Justice, the tool uses a narrative approach across eight picture cards to guide communities through the value of biological resources, the role of traditional knowledge, the process of Prior Informed Consent (PIC), and the negotiation of benefit-sharing agreements. The guide provides facilitators with specific objectives, discussion questions, and simplified terminology to bridge the gap between technical legal frameworks—such as the Nagoya Protocol and the Convention on Biological Diversity—and local customary practices.