Search Climate Insights Directory

The report argues that while Canada has made positive climate commitments, there is a significant investment gap between current budget allocations and the funding required to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. By comparing federal spending with recommendations from expert coalitions, the document identifies critical funding shortages across seven sectors: transport, building retrofits, clean energy, nature and adaptation, agriculture, industry and innovation, and workforce development. It highlights that Canada's per capita climate spending during the pandemic is more than eight times lower than the promises made by the US under Joe Biden. The report calls for the 2021 Budget to prioritize deficit spending on green infrastructure, eliminate fossil fuel subsidies, and implement a just transition for workers, particularly in the coal, oil, and gas sectors.

The report analyzes the contracting of Technical, Economic, and Environmental Feasibility Studies (EVTEA) and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) for federal land transportation projects in the Amazon. It finds a significant lack of transparency in how these studies are selected, assessed, and approved, as well as a lack of clarity in budget allocations. Analysis of EIA budgets for the Ferrogrão railroad and highway BR-364 shows that over 50% of funds are spent on diagnostic analysis, while only 6% are allocated to risk assessment and mitigation measures. The authors recommend defining clearer selection criteria, establishing upfront budget allocations, and introducing a 'pre-viability phase' to shift diagnostic analysis earlier in the project life cycle.

The report identifies significant transparency gaps in the procurement of Technical, Economic, and Environmental Viability Studies (EVTEA) and Environmental Impact Studies (EIA) for land transport projects in the Amazon. It highlights that a disproportionate amount of EIA budgets is spent on diagnostics rather than impact assessment and mitigation. The authors recommend clarifying selection criteria in tenders, detailing budget allocations for socio-environmental components, and introducing a 'pre-feasibility' phase to shift diagnostic analysis earlier in the project lifecycle.

The report highlights a significant lack of transparency in Canada's reporting of fossil fuel subsidies, particularly regarding foregone revenue. It advocates for the use of the WTO definition of subsidies and the 'revenue foregone' method to accurately quantify tax expenditures and royalty subsidies, which the authors argue are essential for informed policy-making and meeting international climate goals.

The document is a formal recommendation from a group of economists to the South African Parliament to reject the Supplementary Budget tabled on 24 June 2020. The authors argue that the budget contradicts President Ramaphosa's R500 billion rescue package by reducing government expenditure by R230 billion over two years and relying on the reprioritisation of existing funds rather than providing new spending. They highlight significant shortfalls in social security, job protection, and health, while noting dangerous cuts to basic education, higher education, and energy transition programmes. The economists suggest alternative financing methods, such as solidarity taxation and increased borrowing, to prevent a catastrophic economic crisis.

The document analyzes the disparity between South Africa's private and public healthcare systems, noting that while public spending has increased since 1994, austerity measures and underfunding have led to severe staffing shortages and declining standards. It highlights a critical gap in per capita spending and a surge in medico-legal claims, arguing that the current funding model is insufficient to implement the National Health Insurance (NHI) or meet the Abuja Declaration targets.

The document analyzes the disparity between South Africa's private and public healthcare systems, noting that while public spending has increased since 1994, austerity measures and underfunding have led to severe staffing shortages and declining standards. It highlights a significant gap in per capita spending and a surge in medico-legal claims, ultimately calling for tax reform and the doubling of public health expenditure by 2025 to support the National Health Insurance (NHI) transition.

The Independent Evaluation Unit (IEU) reported progress on its 2018 work plan between January and May 2018, focusing on institutional strengthening, the development of a GCF evaluation policy, and the initiation of several key evaluations. The IEU is developing an evaluation policy through extensive stakeholder consultations and a reference group of international agencies. Key technical activities include the creation of evidence maps for forestry, adaptation, and transformational change, as well as a study on the evaluability of the GCF portfolio. The unit is also conducting a readiness evaluation and reviewing the GCF results management framework. To support these goals, the IEU has established partnerships with organizations such as the FAO and the Global Development Network and has launched a new website and newsletter to communicate standards and findings. As of April 30, 2018, the IEU had utilized 22% of its approved annual budget of USD 2,953,867.

The paper examines the alignment between national budgets and NDC commitments in four sub-Saharan African countries. It finds that while some ministries show rising budget projections, there are significant discrepancies between planned and actual spending. The analysis reveals that limited domestic resources are allocated to NDC actions, with a heavy reliance on international donor support. The author suggests that programme-based budgeting and Medium-Term Expenditure Frameworks offer opportunities to better track and report climate spending, though current precision remains low.

The Integrated Ridge to Reef Management of the Mesoamerican Reef Ecoregion (MAR2R) project aims to conserve shared freshwater, coastal, and marine resources in Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico. It addresses threats such as unsustainable agriculture, mass tourism, and overfishing by strengthening the leadership of the Central American Commission on Environment and Development (CCAD). The project implements Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) and Integrated Coastal Marine Management (ICMM) through demonstration projects, voluntary certification standards (RSPO, Bonsucro, MSC, ASC), and the establishment of water funds and reserves. A total project cost of $61,107,908 is allocated, with $9,018,349 from the GEF and $51,277,908 in co-financing.

The research paper examines the alignment between South Africa's stated foreign policy goal of 'Africa's centrality' and the actual expenditure of the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO). It finds that South Africa's normative goal of deepening engagement in Africa is generally matched by its resource deployment, with significant spending directed toward strategic economies like Nigeria, Angola, and Ethiopia. Despite budget reductions in 2016 necessitating the closure of non-essential missions, the document argues that diplomatic engagement remains vital for defending national interests and enhancing international prestige.

The Green Climate Fund reported total pledges of approximately US$ 10.2 billion following a High-Level Pledging Conference and subsequent announcements. For the 2014 calendar year, the Fund's actual administrative expenditures were US$ 9.7 million, significantly under its approved budget of US$ 18.8 million, primarily due to delays in staff recruitment. The Fund also reported spending US$ 0.4 million on readiness activities and US$ 718,701 from a special contribution by the Republic of Korea for headquarters equipment.

The document serves as a technical supplement to a report on Indonesia's public climate finance. It provides a detailed breakdown of 2011 state budget expenditures, categorizing funds into climate-specific and potentially climate-relevant outcomes across sectors such as forestry, energy, and transport. It includes a comprehensive list of Indonesian laws and regulations governing public finance and climate action, a registry of climate-relevant policy incentives, and an analysis of local government spending via Specific Allocation Grants. Additionally, it summarizes the climate-related investment activities of various state-owned enterprises and lists the government agencies and international partners consulted during the study.

The report examines the U.S. nuclear weapons complex, focusing on life extension programs, stockpile surveillance, and the management of weapons-usable fissile materials. It argues that several planned facility expansions, such as the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement–Nuclear Facility and a second press at the High Explosives Pressing Facility, are unnecessary based on current arsenal needs and plutonium pit lifetimes. The authors recommend canceling the Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuel program in favor of immobilization for plutonium disposal and suggest increasing research into warhead-level verification for future arms reductions. The document also emphasizes the need to prioritize the Stockpile Surveillance Program and maintain a skilled workforce through competitive benefits and research opportunities.

The International Conservation Budget 2014 details U.S. government initiatives to protect global biodiversity and natural resources. It highlights the strategic link between conservation and national security, noting how resource scarcity and illegal wildlife trafficking fuel instability and terrorism. The report outlines funding and activities across agencies including USAID, the Department of the Treasury (via the Global Environment Facility and Tropical Forest Conservation Act), the Department of State, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Key efforts include combating wildlife trafficking, managing transboundary landscapes through the SCAPES program, and implementing REDD+ initiatives in Mexico and the Amazon. The document emphasizes the role of public-private partnerships and community-based natural resource management in achieving sustainable development and protecting critical ecosystems across Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

The IAI Core Budget request for fiscal year 2012-2013 is US$1,312,578, a slight decrease from the previous year. The budget supports the Directorate's operations, including the management of the Collaborative Research Network (CRN) and Small Grants Programs, and accounts for the relocation of the Directorate from Brazil to Uruguay in January 2013. Salaries and benefits constitute 72% of the core budget. The document also outlines member country contributions, with the United States providing the largest share at US$762,000.

The document identifies that federal energy-related spending in 2010 ranged from $290 billion to $610 billion, with the vast majority supporting petroleum-based transportation and energy security rather than emissions reduction. Only $38 billion was spent on climate mitigation, a small fraction of the total budget, and much of this was temporary stimulus funding from the Recovery Act. The analysis highlights a reliance on tax expenditures for clean energy, which are described as less transparent than direct spending but more politically sustainable.

The 2011/12 budget for South Africa's Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) is 4.719 billion rand, with a primary focus on poverty alleviation and job creation. The department aims to create 130,000 jobs in agriculture, forestry, and fisheries by 2014 and establish 50,000 commercially-oriented smallholder farmers. Key initiatives include the 'Zero Hunger Plan' for smallholder market access and the transformation of 12 agricultural colleges into National Agricultural Training Institutes. The budget allocates specific funds for flood relief (over 200 million rand over three years), forestry sustainability (300 million rand), and the sustainable management of forestry resources (550 million rand). In fisheries, the government has designated 9% of the coastline as prohibited zones and 3% of the offshore zone as no-fishing areas to protect marine ecosystems. The document also highlights South Africa's role as the host for COP 17 and its strategic alignment with BRICS to improve export access.

Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) critiques the UK's Strategic Defence and Security Review for excluding nuclear weapons and maintaining an oversized military budget. SGR advocates for a 25% reduction in military spending, the cancellation of the Trident replacement system, and the retirement of various offensive conventional weapons. The organization argues that funds should be redirected toward tackling the roots of insecurity, such as poverty and unsustainable natural resource consumption, to improve energy security and mitigate climate change.

The IAI's core budget request for FY 2009/2010 is US$1,163,117, a level similar to the previous year. The budget supports the management of the CRN II and SGP-HD programs, interdisciplinary training institutes, and the MacArthur Foundation-funded project on Andean biodiversity. Key financial allocations include US$777,477 for salaries and benefits and US$74,510 for travel. The budget is funded by contributions from member countries, with the United States providing the largest share at US$691,000.