Search Climate Insights Directory

The report argues that humanity has depleted natural capital to achieve short-term gains, leading to a decline in 15 of 24 evaluated ecosystem services. It proposes a five-part action agenda: developing ecosystem service information, strengthening local community rights, managing across multiple scales, improving accountability, and aligning economic incentives. To implement this, the authors suggest creating new institutions such as Ecosystem Service Districts, Biome Stewardship Councils, a Commission on Macroeconomics and Ecosystem Services for Poverty Reduction, and a global Leaders' Forum.

The document outlines proposed revisions to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules to ensure that investor-State arbitrations—defined as those brought by an investor against a State under a treaty—are subject to greater public oversight without affecting other types of arbitrations. The proposals focus on four key areas: public notification of the initiation of arbitration, public disclosure of pleadings and open hearings, public access to final decisions, and the right for non-disputing parties to file amicus curiae briefs.

The report examines the intersection of fisheries access agreements and WTO subsidy law, arguing that while the agreements themselves are not subsidies, the onward transfer of access rights from a Distant Water Fishing Nation (DWFN) to its fleet can constitute a subsidy if the fleet does not pay adequate remuneration. It highlights the negative environmental and social impacts of subsidized distant-water fishing in developing nations and proposes several regulatory options for the WTO, including clarifying the definition of access-related subsidies, introducing transparency requirements, and establishing conditional exceptions for Small Island Developing States (SIDS).

The document proposes the creation of an Environment Outlook for Canada (EOC), an integrated environmental assessment designed to move beyond traditional state-of-the-environment reporting by focusing on future-oriented scenarios. It details the potential scope of the EOC, including key topical issues like climate change and water quality, and suggests a time horizon of 20 to 30 years. The paper emphasizes the need for a participatory process involving policy-makers, shapers, and takers to ensure the assessment is salient, credible, and legitimate. It recommends a feasibility analysis and the development of a formal proposal by fall 2007, suggesting that the EOC could be hosted by an independent secretariat to maintain credibility.

The document outlines a proposal for the Canadian Environmental Outlook (CEO), an integrated environmental assessment designed to provide a prospective view of Canada's environment. It defines the CEO as a process and a series of reports that move beyond traditional state-of-the-environment reporting by focusing on future trends and strategic choices. The paper suggests a 20-to-30-year time horizon and a multi-scalar geographic approach (national, sub-national, and local). It identifies key potential topics such as climate change, water quality, and biodiversity, and recommends a governance structure involving shared ownership between federal, provincial, and territorial governments. The document concludes by recommending a full feasibility analysis and a structured project proposal to be completed by autumn 2007, with a target for a flagship report in 2010.

The policy brief by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) proposes specific amendments to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules to distinguish 'State arbitrations' from private commercial ones. The authors argue that because State arbitrations often involve public funds, governmental misconduct, and critical public policy issues—such as drinking water systems or hazardous waste bans—they require higher standards of transparency. The brief proposes revisions to four articles to ensure public notice of proceedings, open hearings, public access to awards and documents, and the explicit ability for tribunals to accept amicus curiae briefs.

The Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) outlines immediate strategies to lower U.S. crude oil demand, arguing that a 5% to 9% reduction would remove 1.0 to 1.8 million barrels per day from the global market. Proposed measures include reducing speed limits for non-Class 8 vehicles to 60 MPH, increasing the federal Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) for trucks to 110,000 lbs, and mandating Auxiliary Power Units (APUs) for new Class 8 tractors. RMI suggests these actions, combined with increased biofuel procurement and the adoption of 'total-flex' vehicle technology, would restore global excess capacity to 2.5 to 3.8 million barrels per day, thereby reducing price volatility.

The report outlines a proposed model for Environmental Improvement Zones (EIZs) in Winnipeg, designed to shift environmental action from a top-down municipal approach to a neighbourhood-level service delivery model. Based on a review of local precedents like Business Improvement Zones and international examples such as Montreal's Eco-quartiers, the report recommends that EIZs be established through multi-partite agreements between the City of Winnipeg, the Province of Manitoba, and Environment Canada. The proposed model suggests anchoring EIZs in existing community-based organizations, governed by neighbourhood steering committees, and focusing on service innovation and delivery rather than broad sustainability mandates. It provides a detailed implementation roadmap for 2005-2006, including the selection of five pilot neighbourhoods and the hiring of a dedicated coordinator.

The report quantifies the health damages caused by diesel particulate matter (PM2.5) and other emissions across the U.S., highlighting significant risks of premature death, lung cancer, and respiratory illness. It estimates that 21,000 people die prematurely each year in the U.S. due to mobile diesel sources. The document proposes a three-phase retrofit strategy to reduce diesel PM by 85% by 2020, which could avoid approximately 91,000 premature deaths by 2030. It identifies urban areas and 'hotspots'—such as near bus depots and highways—as having significantly higher risks than rural areas. The report also details the effectiveness of retrofit technologies, such as diesel particulate filters (DPF) and closed crankcase filtration, particularly for improving air quality inside school buses.

The Standing Committee on Rules and Procedures recommends updating the IAI's regulatory framework to make the election of the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) and general voting processes more efficient and democratic. Key proposals include limiting the number of candidates nominated by the SAC to avoid excessive voting rounds and revising Articles 49 and 50 to streamline the elimination process when a majority is not reached. The committee also suggests a new rule (Article 50A) to allow the appointment of candidates with the highest number of votes even without a majority, or alternatively, granting the Board of Directors final decision-making authority.

The IISD Model International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable Development provides a comprehensive legal framework designed to align foreign investment with sustainable development goals. It moves away from the traditional focus on solely protecting foreign capital by introducing binding investor obligations, including environmental and social impact assessments, anti-corruption requirements, and adherence to core labour standards. The model establishes a new institutional structure featuring a Conference of the Parties, a Secretariat, and a reformed Dispute Settlement Body with a standing panel of arbitrators and an appellate division to ensure transparency and accountability. It explicitly protects the right of host states to regulate for public welfare objectives, such as public health and the environment, and introduces mechanisms for the abrogation of investor rights in cases of persistent non-compliance.

The authors propose using the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) to hold the United States accountable for climate change impacts on the Inuit. They argue that U.S. emissions, representing approximately 25% of global totals, have caused sea ice retreat and permafrost thaw, threatening Inuit culture and violating rights such as the right to life, health, and property. While the IACHR cannot mandate emission cuts or compensation, a formal finding of human rights violations would provide moral and political leverage and support future litigation.

The briefing introduces action targets, which require an entity to reduce emissions by an agreed percentage of its actual emissions during a commitment period. By using an 'observable baseline' of actual emissions rather than projected ones, action targets eliminate the uncertainty associated with future economic growth. A comparison of a 2% target for Brazil, China, India, and Mexico shows that fixed targets can lead to either burdensome reductions or 'hot air' depending on GDP growth, while action targets maintain a consistent level of effort. The authors suggest action targets are compatible with the Kyoto Protocol and suitable for modest developing country commitments, though further research is needed on their environmental impact and administrative costs.

The document outlines a proposed Nordic research agenda on environment and trade, based on a survey of 315 publications from 2002 to 2003. It identifies a significant lack of research on specific Doha Round negotiating options, southern perspectives, and the environmental impacts of bilateral trade agreements. The proposed agenda emphasizes six key areas: Doha negotiations, developing country research, regional and bilateral developments, regulatory reform, WTO policy research, and 'bigger picture' issues like international investment agreements and commodity markets.

The authors argue that current WTO measures like the Producer Subsidy Equivalent (PSE) and Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS) are inadequate because they measure the volume of support rather than trade distortion. They propose a terms-of-trade indicator—the ratio of export price index to import price index—to identify unfair trade practices. The paper includes a taxonomy of subsidies and a two-country model to demonstrate how a deterioration in terms-of-trade (below a base of 100) can signal unjustifiable over-subsidization.

The document proposes a comprehensive Cotonou Investment Agreement to replace existing bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and better align foreign direct investment with the sustainable development goals of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement (CPA). It argues that current international investment agreements focus too narrowly on investor protection and lack empirical evidence of benefiting developing countries. The proposed agreement would balance investor rights with host state obligations and public goods, incorporating principles of legitimacy, transparency, and accountability. Key recommendations include the establishment of an Observatory for ACP Investment to monitor results, a Cotonou Investment Fund to support small and medium enterprises, and the use of regional institutions to manage environmental reviews and competition authorities. The author emphasizes the need for a dispute settlement mechanism that requires the exhaustion of domestic remedies and shows deference to public policy goals, moving away from current models like ICSID or UNCITRAL.

The paper argues that the predominant reductionist model of Western science has failed, contributing to environmental degradation and the marginalisation of indigenous knowledge. It proposes a non-binding 'Convention on Knowledge' based on principles of public ownership, ecological accountability, and the protection of indigenous rights. The authors call for a shift toward holistic, organic sciences and the banning of destructive technologies, such as weapons of mass destruction and certain forms of genetic engineering, while promoting research into agro-ecology, renewable energy, and holistic health.

The report argues that a TRC in Zimbabwe should be operationally independent of the government, well-funded from the start, and composed of a balanced panel of respected national and international commissioners. It suggests a broad mandate covering serious rights abuses, including land invasions, and recommends public hearings with victim counselling. The author proposes that a conditional amnesty model—requiring full disclosure and excluding crimes like genocide and torture—may be the only realistic way to persuade the current regime to relinquish power. Finally, it assesses the International Criminal Court's (ICC) jurisdiction, noting that while Zimbabwe is not a State Party, the UN Security Council could still refer the situation to the Court.

The document argues that existing poverty-environment initiatives by the World Bank and UNDP-EU treat the environment primarily as a commodity for income generation, neglecting critical life-supporting services. It proposes a new framework for UNEP based on 'elementary functionings' and 'safe minimum standards' (SMS) to protect non-market ecological services like water purification and air quality, which the poor depend on more heavily than the rich. The author introduces the PASIR (Pressure, Activity, State, Impact, Response) methodological framework and a five-stage road map to operationalize these concepts into national policy, emphasizing the need for participatory institutions and stewardship by the poor.

The policy brief argues for the integration of sustainable development into the FTAA process to overcome a 'fundamental disconnect' between trade and environmental policies in the Americas. It proposes a three-pillar strategy: incorporating specific environmental provisions into the FTAA, strengthening hemispheric environmental cooperation through a proposed 'Americas Ecological Accord', and establishing a High Level Hemispheric Experts Group on Trade and Sustainability to facilitate dialogue with civil society and industry.