Discussion Paper on an Environment Outlook for Canada

Report an error

Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The document proposes the creation of an Environment Outlook for Canada (EOC), an integrated environmental assessment designed to move beyond traditional state-of-the-environment reporting by focusing on future-oriented scenarios. It details the potential scope of the EOC, including key topical issues like climate change and water quality, and suggests a time horizon of 20 to 30 years. The paper emphasizes the need for a participatory process involving policy-makers, shapers, and takers to ensure the assessment is salient, credible, and legitimate. It recommends a feasibility analysis and the development of a formal proposal by fall 2007, suggesting that the EOC could be hosted by an independent secretariat to maintain credibility.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • An environment outlook is distinguished from traditional state of the environment (SoE) reports by its focus on the future, examining the medium- to long-term impacts of current trends and policy choices.
  • For an environmental assessment to influence its audience, it must be perceived as salient (relevant), credible (based on trusted information), and legitimate (considering a variety of actor perspectives), which is often achieved through the co-production of knowledge.
  • The proposed EOC would ideally cover a time horizon of 20 to 30 years, providing a compromise that allows for policy implementation and business capital investment planning, while extending up to 50 years for national issues like climate change.
  • The EOC's geographic scope should be multi-scalar, addressing issues nationally (e.g., climate change mitigation), sub-nationally (e.g., sea ice), and locally (e.g., smog and water quality).
  • To ensure independence and credibility, it is recommended that the EOC be managed by a secretariat hosted outside of government by an independent organization or academic institution.
  • Estimated resource requirements for a consultative national outlook process, based on international examples, could range from US$800,000 to 1,000,000 over 18 to 24 months, excluding modeling costs.

Cite the original document

APA
Rothman, D. S. (2007). Discussion Paper on an Environment Outlook for Canada. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/env_outlook_discussion.pdf
Chicago
Rothman, Dale S. Discussion Paper on an Environment Outlook for Canada. International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2007. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/env_outlook_discussion.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |last1=Rothman |first1=Dale S. |title=Discussion Paper on an Environment Outlook for Canada |publisher=International Institute for Sustainable Development |date=June 2007 |url=https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/env_outlook_discussion.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{rothman2007discussion, author = {Rothman, Dale S.}, title = {{Discussion Paper on an Environment Outlook for Canada}}, institution = {International Institute for Sustainable Development}, year = {2007}, month = jun, url = {https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/env_outlook_discussion.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated