Search Climate Insights Directory

The Climate Bonds Resilience Taxonomy (CBRT) provides a structured framework for identifying and qualifying investments that enhance climate resilience. It categorizes investments across seven themes and various sectors, requiring that each investment addresses at least one physical climate hazard. To be eligible, investments must demonstrate a substantial contribution to resilience, manage maladaptation risks, and adhere to 'Do No Significant Harm' (DNSH) principles regarding climate mitigation and environmental protection. The CBRT distinguishes between 'Adapted' and 'Enabling' investments, as well as 'Activities' and 'Measures', and offers different evaluation pathways—automatic, simplified, or process-based—depending on the investment type. The framework is intended for use by government agencies, financial institutions, real-economy sectors, and market stakeholders to support the issuance and verification of resilience-linked bonds and loans.

The Agrifood Transition Plan Assessment Framework establishes a methodology for evaluating corporate transition strategies in the agrifood sector. It categorizes companies into 'committed' (early) and 'advanced' phases based on the maturity of their transition plans. The framework emphasizes a holistic approach that integrates greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction—specifically targeting methane and nitrous oxide—with nature-based goals such as eliminating deforestation and land conversion. It provides detailed requirements for Paris-aligned targets, action plans for producers and downstream actors, and accountability metrics, while aligning with international disclosure standards like TCFD, TNFD, and ICMA.

The Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) introduces the 'AAA' framework—comprising Ambition, Action, and Accountability—to evaluate corporate transition plans. The guidance emphasizes that credible plans must include quantitative targets aligned with 1.5°C scientific pathways, robust financial and action plans, strong board-level governance, and transparent annual disclosures. It specifically warns against the over-reliance on carbon offsets and the use of national NDCs as primary decarbonization pathways.

The guidance outlines the application of GHG accounting within the real estate sector, specifically focusing on Scope 3 (value chain) emissions. It adapts the GHG Protocol's 15 categories to the building and construction system, identifying intended users—such as property developers, asset managers, and architecture firms—and mapping their reporting responsibilities across different life cycle stages of a building project.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 introduced "direct pay" (or "elective pay"), allowing tax-exempt entities—such as nonprofits, state and local governments, and tribal governments—to receive direct payments from the IRS in lieu of tax credits for clean energy investments. Eligible credits include a 30% base credit for solar and battery storage, credits for commercial electric vehicles up to $40,000, and credits for alternative fuel infrastructure. Additional bonuses are available for projects in "energy communities," those using "domestic content," or those qualifying for the Low-Income Community Tax Credit. The process involves pre-registering with the IRS and filing specific tax forms, with a total timeline ranging from four to 18 months.

The IRMF Results Handbook outlines the GCF's approach to results-based management, focusing on measuring paradigm shift, mitigation, adaptation, and enabling environments. It defines core and supplementary indicators, establishes reporting requirements via Annual Performance Reports (APRs) and evaluations, and provides a structured methodology for setting baselines and targets to ensure portfolio-wide data aggregation.

The GCF EFA Guidance outlines the methodologies for performing financial analysis (from an investor's perspective) and economic analysis (from a societal perspective) to support the assessment of GCF investment criteria. It provides sector-specific recommendations for areas such as transport, water security, energy efficiency, and agriculture, while detailing the required profitability indicators, baseline scenario development, and sensitivity analysis needed for project appraisal.

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) requires economic and financial analyses for SAP proposals to assess them against the GCF Investment Framework, particularly regarding efficiency and effectiveness. Private sector proposals must include a formal financial analysis and model to justify concessionality and sustainability. Public sector proposals generally do not require a formal model unless they involve financial reflows, though they must still demonstrate cost-effectiveness and viability through models or alternative evidence such as benchmarked carbon reduction estimates or evaluation reports from similar projects.

The document argues that funders of Just Transition projects in Africa should move away from top-down models toward locally-led development. It identifies intermediary organisations—such as non-profits, community foundations, and trade unions—as critical bridges that help funders access local knowledge, build trust, and manage risks. The guide outlines a continuum of local engagement ranging from 'inform' to 'support' (where goals originate from the community) and provides specific recommendations for funders, including budgeting for co-design, pacing projects to match trust-building, and building the institutional capacity of intermediaries.

The document specifies that subawardees must report key performance indicators to the Forest Service and provide quarterly progress reports to GreenLatinos. It emphasizes that activities must be focused on low-income and disadvantaged communities, referencing tools like the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool and EJScreen for guidance. A non-exhaustive list of possible metrics is provided, covering tree inventory, canopy expansion, community outreach, workforce training, and the creation of green jobs.

The document outlines the eligibility criteria, team composition requirements, and financial guidelines for small grants aimed at implementing Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) projects in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). It emphasizes a transdisciplinary approach, requiring teams to include both university stakeholders and community members. Projects must support EbA objectives, specifically helping people adapt to climate change, utilizing biodiversity, and integrating into urban territory adaptation strategies. The grants support a project duration of 18 months, with a focus on strengthening university-community partnerships and the EPIC-N model.

The Zero Hunger Private Sector Pledge is a non-binding initiative inviting companies to align their investments with science-based evidence to combat hunger. Companies must commit financial resources to at least one of ten high-impact intervention areas and at least one priority country or region. The pledge allows for four types of financial contributions: core business investments, subsidized contributions, cash, and in-kind contributions. Implementation requires partnering with governments or designated international organizations, and progress is monitored via the World Benchmarking Alliance's Food and Agriculture Benchmark.

The document outlines the framework for the Private Sector Pledge for Zero Hunger, inviting companies to make non-binding financial commitments in high-impact areas and priority countries. It details four types of financial contributions—core commercial investments, subsidized contributions, cash, and in-kind contributions—and emphasizes alignment with national priorities and evidence-based interventions. The guide specifies that investments must be new and aligned with the Ceres2030 investment domains. It also establishes a reporting mechanism linked to the World Benchmarking Alliance's Food and Agriculture Benchmark (FAB) to track progress toward Sustainable Development Goal 2.

The document serves as a comprehensive guide for the International Institute for Justice and the Rule of Law to develop its training curricula. It emphasizes the critical role of policymakers and senior officials in driving institutional change and provides a step-by-step methodology for capacity building, including needs assessments and participant selection. Additionally, it advocates for the use of immersive, simulation-based training to recreate the complexity of real-life criminal justice incidents, specifically in the context of counterterrorism.

The guide outlines NRK's ambition to integrate environmental considerations into all production decisions, drawing on international experience from organizations like Albert. It identifies transport, energy consumption, and material use as primary areas for reduction, offering specific tactics such as choosing local locations, using LED lighting, and implementing reuse plans for sets and props. The document emphasizes the need for a designated environmental lead for each production and suggests using carbon calculators to identify the most significant impacts.

The fact sheet outlines seven guiding principles to help developing countries secure adaptation finance. It emphasizes that strategies should identify strategic uses of finance, align with national development priorities, improve the enabling environment, and establish implementation and measurement processes. Furthermore, the preparation process must be country-driven, inclusive, and involve ministries of finance and planning.

The Country Support Hub (CSH), launched in 2016 by the NAP Global Network, provides free short-term professional advice and technical support to developing countries to maintain momentum in the development and implementation of National Adaptation Plans (NAPs). Support includes virtual expert advice and in-country technical assistance lasting up to six months, with budgets typically under USD 30,000 per request. Eligible applicants include NAP focal points or government employees from developing countries who are registered members of the NAP Global Network. The CSH assists with planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, institutional arrangements, information exchange, and capacity building, including gender mainstreaming and alignment with Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and Green Climate Fund (GCF) proposals.

The guide outlines three primary areas of inquiry for investors to evaluate private equity firms: the plan for a net-zero energy portfolio, the implementation of a just and equitable transition for workers and communities, and the alignment of political spending and lobbying with the Paris Agreement. It argues that conventional energy investments, including pipelines and coal plants, have largely underperformed over the last decade, highlighting both financial and climate risks.

The document outlines the impact of the built environment on global emissions and provides a framework for designers to reduce embodied carbon. It emphasizes that the most cost-effective interventions occur early in the design phase and suggests five key strategies: collaborative design, effective design (including adaptive reuse), efficient design, low-carbon material selection, and designing for longevity.

The guide outlines a structured approach for utilities to engage underserved communities in the clean energy transition, focusing on identification, inclusive participation, accessible input processes, collaborative program design, and progress tracking.