Search Climate Insights Directory

The study evaluates eight electricity generation pathways for Estonia, concluding that 'All technologies' and 'Renewable + Storage (offshore wind)' offer the best balance of benefits, costs, and feasibility. While all pathways can reach carbon neutrality by 2050, they require substantial investments averaging €8.0 billion. Key findings highlight the necessity of onshore wind, solar PV, and a massive build-out of battery storage (up to 9.3 GW by 2050) to manage intermittency. The report recommends streamlining planning processes, expanding the balancing market, and implementing risk-reduction instruments like contracts for difference to attract investment.

The Agenda 2030 Compass is a decision-support system consisting of a Context Mapper and a Strategy Analyser. It enables organisations to quantify how a planned action affects the 17 SDGs, accounting for context-specific synergies and trade-offs. The tool was developed through a collaboration between the Stockholm Environment Institute, Jernkontoret, and the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, and has been pilot-tested in Swedish case studies involving e-scooters, housing, urban mobility, and regional innovation.

The report analyzes India's plastic waste value chain, highlighting the critical role of the informal sector in achieving high recycling rates despite a relatively new and inconsistently enforced regulatory landscape. It identifies significant barriers to policy implementation, such as a lack of source segregation and the absence of affordable alternatives to single-use plastics. The document also showcases innovative repurposing techniques, including the use of plastic in road construction and fuel production, and provides sector-specific recommendations to improve the circularity and efficiency of the plastic waste system.

The 7th ASEAN Energy Outlook (AEO7) analyzes energy demand, supply, and electricity generation across the ASEAN region through four scenarios: Baseline, AMS Targets (ATS), APAEC Targets (APS), and Least-Cost Optimisation (LCO). It finds that without policy intervention, energy demand will triple by 2050 and fossil fuels will continue to dominate. However, implementing national and regional policies can significantly reduce total final energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. The report emphasizes the need for increased energy efficiency, higher renewable energy penetration, and regional grid interconnection to ensure energy security and sustainability.

The Agenda 2030 Compass is a tool developed by the Stockholm Environment Institute, Jernkontoret, the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence, and Swedwise to help decision-makers evaluate how investments, policies, or products affect the SDGs. It consists of a Context Mapper, which identifies potential SDG interactions based on local factors like socio-economic conditions and energy mix, and a Strategy Analyser, a workshop-based process used to score direct impacts and identify indirect synergies and trade-offs. The tool was pilot-tested in four Swedish case studies involving electric scooters, smart energy housing, urban mobility, and regional innovation strategies.

The report examines the intersection of air pollution and labor markets in East and Southeast Asia, highlighting a significant gap in research and policy regarding informal workers. It finds that while formal sectors are regulated, informal workers—including street vendors and agricultural laborers—face high exposure with minimal social protection. Health burdens are highest in China and Mongolia for ambient pollution, and in Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar for household pollution. The report argues that current solutions are overly technocentric and fail to address the social inequalities and structural vulnerabilities that determine exposure levels.

The UNCHAIN project utilizes an impact chain method to improve climate change risk assessments and adaptation actions. In a case study in Halmstad, Sweden, researchers adapted this model to explore how multiple hydrometeorological hazards interact with pre-existing vulnerabilities to create cascading disruptions across critical infrastructures and vital societal functions, potentially generating new vulnerable social groups. The process emphasized the co-production of knowledge, integrating stakeholder expertise from sectors such as water services, urban planning, and risk management through a participatory, iterative approach based on five selected modules of the impact chain framework.

The document argues that nature-based solutions (NbS) often fail to achieve their potential because planning ignores the complexities of scale. It highlights that NbS have longer time-lags than grey infrastructure, spatial dependencies that transcend individual sites, and jurisdictional barriers that complicate governance. The authors recommend a shift toward quantitative targets, 'no regrets' strategies, and cross-jurisdictional coordination to avoid large-scale maladaptation.

The report assesses Sweden's vulnerability to climate risks originating in other countries through its open economy and global trade links. Using three types of trade data—national toll logs, input-output tables, and resource footprints—the study finds that while direct trade partners (e.g., Germany and Nordic countries) are relatively resilient, deeper supply chain tiers reveal significant dependencies on climate-vulnerable emerging economies in Asia and Africa. A detailed case study on Brazilian soy demonstrates that while production risks in key sourcing areas like Mato Grosso are currently low, transport risks—specifically landslides and flash floods on long roads to ports—pose a higher threat. The authors argue that traditional risk management strategies like substitution are limited by the systemic nature of climate change and the 'stickiness' of trade relationships, recommending that Sweden integrate transboundary risk into its National Adaptation Strategy and lead global multilateral efforts for systemic resilience.

The document finds that Sweden's five largest banks have limited alignment with the Paris Agreement, having facilitated approximately USD 150 billion to high-emitting 'brown' sectors since 2016. While 'green' investments have increased, they remain significantly lower than 'brown' and 'grey' flows. The authors argue that a lack of granular data and standardized definitions hinders transparency, recommending the adoption of International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) standards and EU-level regulations to better track the transition to a low-emission economy.

The study finds limited alignment with the Paris Agreement, as financing to high-emitting 'brown' sectors generally increased in volume since 2016, while 'green' investments remained marginal in absolute terms.

The document examines how climate-driven extreme weather events, such as floods and droughts, create cascading failures in essential services that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations in Halmstad, Sweden. It identifies key drivers of social vulnerability—including age, income, and disability—and argues that municipalities should integrate social perspectives into their risk and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructure to improve crisis preparedness.

The briefing examines social vulnerability in Halmstad, Sweden, in the context of climate-driven water-related hazards. It argues that while Sweden is generally resilient, specific social groups remain vulnerable due to intersecting factors such as age, income, and disability. Using the impact chain model, the authors demonstrate how disruptions to critical infrastructure—such as water, energy, and transport—can create cascading effects that disproportionately impact the most vulnerable and can even create new vulnerable groups. The document highlights 'erosive coping' where disaster responses may inadvertently reinforce existing inequalities. It recommends that local authorities integrate social dimensions into their risk and vulnerability assessments to design more effective disaster risk reduction strategies.

The document argues that while the EU's Fit for 55 Package is essential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, its mitigation policies risk disproportionately affecting vulnerable citizens and workers in carbon-intensive industries. It recommends a progressive approach to fiscal reform, including the redistribution of carbon revenues and the use of the Social Climate Fund, to maintain political support and protect living standards. The paper emphasizes the need for targeted energy policies to address high energy prices and active reconversion policies for regions dependent on fossil fuels, noting the role of the Just Transition Fund in supporting coal-dependent areas.

The document introduces a framework designed to evaluate the environmental and social benefits and trade-offs of circular economy approaches to urban organic waste. Developed through literature reviews and stakeholder interviews, the framework allows for sustainability assessments even with limited data. When applied to Naivasha, Kenya, the framework identified potential benefits including reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved natural resource efficiency, and job creation, alongside risks such as negative impacts on worker health and smallholder farmers.

The study compares the Integrated MultisatellitE Retrievals for- Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) and Climate Forecast and System Reanalysis (CFSR) products against approximately 50,000 in-situ surface stations globally. The results indicate that IMERG generally outperforms CFSR in simulating monthly rainfall across most regions, continents, and countries. Specifically, IMERG showed significantly better mean Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) in 64 countries. While CFSR provided satisfactory simulations for Europe, North America, and Australia, it was unsatisfactory for other continents. To facilitate the use of high-quality data for hydrologic modelling, the authors introduced the Worldwide Weather Service (W3S) for the preprocessing and dissemination of IMERG precipitation data.

The authors argue that the current USD 100 billion climate finance target has been fraught with difficulties due to ambiguous definitions and contrasting interpretations regarding investment mobilization versus resource transfer. To improve transparency, accountability, and trust, they propose setting a specific sub-target for grants alongside other targets. The paper identifies five priority elements for negotiations: the relation to Article 2.1(c) of the Paris Agreement, the adaptation-mitigation balance, financial instruments, the mobilization of private finance, and the concept of "new and additional" finance.

The document highlights that approximately 30% of global food production is lost or wasted, necessitating a shift toward a circular bioeconomy. It argues that technical solutions alone are insufficient and must be paired with behavioral change, institutional capacity building, and incentives. The brief specifically emphasizes the role of urban and peri-urban farming systems in absorbing waste and suggests that a circular bioeconomy approach could yield US$ 2.7 trillion in annual benefits by 2050.

The document finds that while agriculture drove 90-99% of tropical deforestation between 2011 and 2015, only 45-65% of that land became productive agriculture. It argues that international supply chain measures are limited because one-third to one-half of agriculture-driven deforestation does not result in actively managed land, and approximately three-quarters of agricultural expansion into forests is driven by domestic demand, particularly for beef and cereals.

The document serves as a consolidation of a flagship report examining how intersecting forms of discrimination create differentiated vulnerabilities to climate change across 10 ASEAN Member States. It focuses on integrating gender equality and social inclusion into three key sectors: renewable energy, disaster risk reduction, and agriculture, with detailed policy reviews for Cambodia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Viet Nam.