Search Climate Insights Directory

The study evaluates the Netherlands' progress toward the Paris Agreement's goals across the power, transport, buildings, industry, and agriculture sectors, concluding that while the country leads in electric vehicle sales, it lags in renewable energy supply and requires substantially strengthened climate policy to meet its obligations as a developed nation.

The document argues that achieving NDC goals requires substantial private sector investment in low-carbon, climate-resilient infrastructure. It proposes using Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to create the policy and financial frameworks necessary to make these investments competitive against carbon-intensive alternatives by addressing investment barriers and risks.

The Paris Agreement is projected to significantly impact the global economy and private sector as the international community aims for net zero emissions by the second half of the century. The report examines how the agreement and NDCs influence renewable energy markets, carbon pricing, and climate risk management, with a specific focus on clean energy investments, energy efficiency, and the competitiveness of renewables.

The report assesses the impact of corporate commitments—specifically RE100, Science-Based Targets, EP100, Zero-Deforestation, and the LCTPi—on global emission reductions and evaluates how supportive policy environments could enhance these contributions.

The document provides a synthesis of challenges and lessons learned from the preparation of intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) by UNFCCC Parties prior to the Paris Agreement. It aims to support the implementation and development of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) by improving clarity and ambition. The findings are based on NewClimate Institute research, including two surveys of developing country representatives, and incorporate examples from GIZ's work with over 30 partner countries to address thematic challenges.

An analysis of the 156 INDCs submitted by December 2015 reveals that at least 78% contained conditions, with approximately one third consisting solely of conditional contributions.

The document argues that for Germany to be compatible with the Paris Agreement's goals of limiting temperature increase to well below 2°C and aiming for 1.5°C, it must achieve zero CO2 emissions before 2035. This would require a 100% renewable energy mix across all sectors by 2035, a complete phase-out of coal by approximately 2025, and the renovation of 5% of existing buildings annually to nearly zero energy standards.

The document reports that decarbonization in the power and transport sectors is exceeding previous predictions. It highlights a faster-than-expected shift away from coal in the EU, US, and China, as well as wind and solar capacity growth that has surpassed forecasts. In transport, passenger vehicle fleets in key economies are less carbon-intense than in 2005, and the market penetration of electric drive vehicles is exceeding predictions.

The document outlines a framework for evaluating the ambition of mitigation commitments before and after the Paris Agreement. It reviews existing activities for assessing individual INDCs, discusses the necessary attributes and requirements for such assessments, and explores how these evaluations can be integrated into the UNFCCC process. The paper concludes with recommendations on a feasible path forward, identifying potential opportunities and challenges in the assessment process.

The report examines design elements for mitigation commitments in the 2015 global climate agreement, focusing on participation, commitment types, ambition guidance, and transparency to ensure effective and equitable national targets.

The preparation of intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs) has acted as a catalyst for national climate change mitigation action and policy making. Evidence from surveys and interviews indicates that the international process has driven significant developments in national capacity and potential mitigation actions for the period before 2020 for most countries, independent of the specific ambition levels proposed for post-2020 actions.

The report argues for the creation of specific 2°C-compatible investment criteria to guide the shift of capital from high to low carbon investments. While many international financial institutions currently use climate considerations, the document notes that these existing approaches do not explicitly link to the 2°C limit.

The report finds that the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) achieved an unintended net mitigation impact of approximately 480 MtCO2e in 2014, reducing global emissions by about 1% because projects continued operating mitigation equipment without issuing offsets due to low market prices. It further analyzes how different Certified Emission Reduction (CER) price points would affect this unintended mitigation, noting that a price of EUR 5 would reduce the unintended impact by over 50% compared to a EUR 2 scenario.

The document examines the relationship between NAMAs and INDCs, noting that over a third of developing countries link the two in their submissions. It aims to analyze how these specific actions and broader targets interact across key implementation areas including finance, MRV, and sustainable development.

The study evaluates the impact of energy efficiency (EE) on the costs of achieving the internationally agreed 2°C target by 2050. It specifically compares the global cost savings up to 2030 of a pathway emphasizing EE measures against one that focuses primarily on decarbonizing the energy supply.

The report evaluates the emissions commitments of ten countries for 2025 and 2030, analyzing how their INDCs align with different 'fair share' approaches and effort sharing models while considering national mitigation costs, socio-economic development, and current political contexts.

The report examines the co-benefits of climate action within the framework of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) and identifies the potential benefits lost by not transitioning to 100% renewable energy by 2050, focusing on a selection of major economies.

The document identifies a research gap regarding the impact of non-state actors—such as cities, regions, and companies—on Germany's greenhouse gas emissions projections. It argues that these independent mitigation activities are not comprehensively reflected in the national projections used for GHG targets. The study seeks to quantify how these non-state initiatives affect the 2020 emissions gap and longer-term targets up to 2050.

The document highlights the role of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in diffusing carbon price signals and stimulating private investment in developing countries, while noting a deterioration in project activities and capacities due to declining market conditions. It identifies a significant information gap regarding the current status and barriers facing individual CDM projects worldwide and describes a study that evaluated a representative sample of these projects to extract lessons on national and technology-specific considerations.

The document defines results-based financing (RBF) and argues for the integration of carbon market and non-market climate finance. It suggests that moving away from the parallel existence of these two modalities can yield synergies that enhance the effectiveness of climate mitigation efforts.