Search Climate Insights Directory

The report identifies that Ontario provided nearly CAD 700 million in public subsidies for fossil fuel consumption in 2018/19. These primarily consist of tax exemptions for aviation, railway, and agricultural fuels, as well as direct spending on natural gas infrastructure. The authors argue that these subsidies distort the market and hinder climate goals, recommending a transparent provincial self-review to identify more sustainable alternatives for energy affordability and industry competitiveness.

The document provides a data-driven baseline of coal production and consumption subsidies in Canada for 2016 and 2017, noting a specific financial pledge to support the transition away from coal.

The document serves as a background paper to track the phase-out of coal subsidies in Indonesia as part of a global energy transition, noting that the country provides significant support to coal-fired power production and consumption.

The document identifies that the Russian government provides significant support for coal mining and the infrastructure required for exports. It serves as a baseline for tracking the phase-out of coal subsidies within the context of a global energy transition and acts as a background paper to a broader report on G20 coal subsidies.

The document identifies that state-owned companies manage most coal mining and power production in India and tracks coal subsidies for 2016 and 2017. Additionally, it notes that while subsidies for renewable energy and electric vehicles more than doubled in FY 2022, India's support for fossil fuels remained four times higher than for clean energy, though this gap narrowed from FY 2021.

The document serves as a background paper to a larger report on G20 coal subsidies, specifically focusing on Mexico's support for coal production and consumption during 2016 and 2017 to monitor progress toward a global energy transition.

The report tracks G20 nations' efforts to phase out coal subsidies, finding that despite a 2009 commitment, these governments continue to spend at least USD 63.9 billion annually on coal and have failed to fully document the extent of this support.

The report identifies four key developments in Canada's approach to foreign bribery: increased enforcement of the Foreign Bribery Prohibition under the OECD Convention, expanded firm-level compliance requirements, mandatory payment transparency for the extractive industry, and the pursuit of a "progressive" trade and investment agenda including a new model Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA).

The document describes a Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi) assessment of two sites in Manitoba: the civil engineered Stephenfield Reservoir and the natural wetland Pelly's Lake. It aims to quantify the financial value of ecosystem services—such as flood protection, water storage, and carbon offsets—to inform policy-makers and investors on the benefits of maintaining natural and built infrastructure over traditional grey infrastructure.

This briefing describes the use of open spatial data to identify environmental 'hotspots' in Manitoba to optimize the allocation of limited resources for water quality, sustainable agriculture, and carbon sequestration.

The report advocates for "subsidy swaps," where governments redirect financial support from fossil fuels to clean energy (renewables and energy efficiency). It argues that while removing fossil fuel subsidies alone can reduce emissions, swapping those funds into clean energy magnifies long-term climate benefits and supports a "just transition" for workers and communities. The document provides evidence from India, Indonesia, Zambia, and Morocco to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and suggests that governments should focus on large-scale on-grid renewables and leveraging private finance to maximize impact.

The report evaluates the financial value of nature-based infrastructure in Manitoba, Canada, specifically Pelly's Lake (a natural wetland) and Stephenfield Reservoir (a naturalized built reservoir). Using the SAVi methodology, it calculates the value of services such as irrigation, water storage, nutrient removal, and carbon sequestration. The analysis finds that both assets are significantly more cost-effective than equivalent grey infrastructure. For Stephenfield Reservoir, the cumulative discounted value of enabled economic activity is CAD 6.07 billion by 2050, while replacing its services with grey infrastructure would cost CAD 5.33 million in capital. For Pelly's Lake, ecosystem services are valued at approximately CAD 60 million, whereas equivalent grey infrastructure would cost CAD 36.99 million. The report argues that maintaining these natural assets optimizes value for money and supports climate adaptation against floods and droughts.

The report evaluates the N’Diaye wind farm in Senegal using the SAVi tool, which incorporates externalities and climate risks into financial modelling. While traditional analysis suggests coal is the cheapest option, a holistic cost-benefit analysis reveals that wind energy is the most favourable choice due to lower environmental impacts, higher employment generation, and the avoidance of significant social costs of carbon. HFO is found to be financially non-viable across all scenarios.

The report evaluates the Taïba N’Diaye wind farm in Senegal, comparing it to coal and heavy fuel oil (HFO) power generation. Using the SAVi methodology, it finds that while coal appears cheaper in conventional financial analyses, the wind farm is the most beneficial option when accounting for climate risks and external effects. The wind farm minimizes environmental impacts, maximizes socio-economic benefits such as job creation, and achieves a lower integrated Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) than the fossil fuel alternatives.

The document analyzes Mexico's fiscal dependence on fossil fuels amidst declining reserves and production. It highlights a shift where revenues from fuel consumption (IEPS and IVA) are becoming more significant than extraction revenues. The report warns against 'stranded assets' resulting from continued investment in fossil fuel infrastructure and recommends redirecting regressive subsidies toward clean energy and vulnerable populations to support a just energy transition.

This research paper assesses the impact of removing consumer fossil fuel subsidies by 2025 across 26 countries, finding a simple average GHG emission reduction of 6% by 2030 compared to business as usual. The study argues that while FFSR alone is insufficient to meet Paris Agreement goals, combining it with a 10% energy tax and reallocating 30% of savings into renewable energy and energy efficiency could increase average reductions to 13.2% by 2030. It highlights that FFSR is a cost-effective tool, saving governments an average of USD 93 per tonne of CO2e removed. The paper also reviews the regressive nature of fuel subsidies and advocates for 'subsidy swaps' toward sustainable energy and social safety nets, noting that only 8% of current NDCs explicitly include FFSR.

The document outlines a methodology for calculating the amount of fossil fuel subsidies per unit of GDP, as required by SDG indicator 12.c.1, for both national and global estimates.

The IGF Mining Policy Framework Assessment for Ecuador identifies gaps in environmental management and post-mining transition. It recommends that the government improve community consultations with Indigenous Peoples, integrate international environmental best practices into national law, enhance waste and water management guidelines in impact studies, and strengthen the formalization and data collection for the artisanal and small-scale mining sector.

The document introduces a guide for facilitating peer learning among adaptation policy-makers, based on Targeted Topic Forums (TTFs) piloted by the NAP Global Network. These forums, which involved government representatives from 23 countries, focused on themes such as financing, gender, and sectoral integration to move away from presentation-heavy meetings toward participatory planning.

Kenya is implementing a phased approach to develop an adaptation monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to overcome common challenges such as data scarcity and measurement uncertainty. The system is designed to align with the country's climate change policy context and priority adaptation actions.