Search Climate Insights Directory

The document highlights the synergies between climate change mitigation and the prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), identifying key areas for multisectoral intervention. It emphasizes that shifting to clean energy, promoting active transport, and adopting sustainable food systems can reduce both greenhouse gas emissions and NCD risk factors like air pollution and physical inactivity. The briefing advocates for policy coherence across government ministries and a whole-of-society approach to achieve these health and environmental co-benefits.

The document highlights the intersection between climate change and non-communicable diseases (NCDs), identifying air pollution, physical inactivity, and poor diet as shared risk factors. It proposes 'co-benefit' solutions across four key sectors: air quality (clean stoves), energy (transition to renewables), transport (active mobility), and food systems (plant-based, local diets). The brief emphasizes that integrated policies—particularly at the municipal level—can provide immediate health improvements and economic savings while contributing to long-term climate goals and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The report finds that the COVID-19 lockdown led to a significant reduction in air pollution in Bengaluru, primarily due to a sharp decline in motorized transportation. Analysis of 26 monitoring stations showed an average 28% drop in PM2.5 levels, while satellite data indicated a 40% reduction in NO2. The most significant decrease occurred near Bellandur Lake (75%), attributed to the halt of construction and vehicular movement. Conversely, the lowest reduction was seen near Halasuru Hospital (14%), likely due to continued essential hospital visits. The study concludes that the transportation sector is the primary driver of air pollution in the city and recommends shifting to electric vehicles, enhancing public transport, and promoting non-motorized transportation to maintain breathable air quality.

The 'Cradle to Grave' report is a comprehensive global overview of the health impacts of fossil fuels, spanning from extraction to waste and from fetal development to old age. Grounded in over 600 scientific citations, it argues that fossil fuel reliance is a 'public health emergency' rather than just an environmental issue. The document highlights that fossil fuels cause immediate harms—including cancers, respiratory illnesses, and cardiovascular disease—and that 'clean' fossil fuel narratives are marketing strategies. It advocates for a rapid, just transition to renewable energy, the redirection of $7 trillion in fossil fuel subsidies toward public health and clean energy, and the application of the precautionary principle where research gaps exist.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group to Advance Action on Climate Change and Health calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into all health professional education, citing a global lack of such programs and institutional barriers. The letter advocates for updated curricula, increased funding for research, and multi-sectoral collaboration to build resilient, low-carbon health systems. It provides an appendix of existing global resources, including courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Kiribati, as well as core competency frameworks developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The document lists several climate and health educational initiatives, including certificate courses for health professionals in the Caribbean and Latin America, a Planetary Health MOOC from Brazil, and a 'Core Competencies' framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education (GCCHE).

The Doha Declaration, issued by the Global Climate and Health Alliance, asserts that health should be a primary driver for climate mitigation and adaptation. It highlights that climate change threatens health through extreme weather, food and water insecurity, and infectious diseases, while noting that transitioning to low-carbon energy systems and active transport can save millions of lives and improve air quality. The document calls for the full evaluation of health co-benefits in climate decisions, the cessation of global fossil fuel subsidies, increased funding for health protection in vulnerable countries, and the active inclusion of the health sector in designing climate strategies.

The document outlines the severe health vulnerabilities of the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region due to climate change, emphasizing the disproportionate impact on marginalized groups. It calls for a transition to sustainable food and energy systems, the strengthening of primary healthcare, and the implementation of climate justice to protect the right to health.

The Common Position of Latin America and the Caribbean on Climate Change and Health identifies the region's high vulnerability to extreme weather and climate-sensitive diseases, exacerbated by structural inequalities. It argues for the integration of health into national climate policies (NDCs and NAPs), the strengthening of primary care, and the application of climate justice for marginalized communities. The document highlights significant gaps in health sector adaptation planning and a lack of health-specific indicators in climate finance, specifically noting that only 11.6% of Green Climate Fund projects in the region include explicit health benefits. It calls for a fair transition to a fossil-fuel-free economy and increased international support for regional health capacities.

The document outlines the critical intersection of climate change and public health in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), emphasizing that while the region contributes only 6.7% of global greenhouse gas emissions, it faces profound vulnerability. It details how extreme heat, floods, and shifting disease patterns—such as a 54% increase in dengue transmission potential—disproportionately affect marginalized groups, including indigenous peoples and the urban poor. The position paper demands the integration of health into National Determined Contributions (NDCs), the decarbonization of health systems and food production, and the implementation of the Belém Action Plan. It calls for a 'just transition' that protects human rights and incorporates ancestral knowledge, while urging the international community to provide financial and technological transfers to strengthen primary health care and climate resilience in the region.

The Global Climate and Health Alliance and various health leaders argue that a rapid phase-out of fossil fuels is essential to prevent overwhelming health consequences and to achieve the 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement. They highlight that air pollution from fossil fuels causes 7 million premature deaths annually and cost the global economy over US$8.1 trillion in 2019. The letter calls for a just energy transition that prioritizes marginalized communities, the redirection of fossil fuel subsidies toward clean energy, and the exclusion of fossil fuel industry lobbyists from climate negotiations.

The document presents a framework for a just energy transition, detailing how moving away from fossil fuels improves public health, urban living, and energy access. It highlights benefits such as reduced respiratory diseases, improved mental health, and the creation of decent work in renewable energy.

The document presents a vision of a healthy, fossil-free society achieved through an energy transition. It highlights improvements in public health, such as reduced respiratory diseases and lower heat stress, alongside the creation of decent jobs in renewables and the implementation of zero-carbon infrastructure. Key focus areas include the development of healthy cities with active transport and nature-based cooling, and expanding clean energy access to improve healthcare, education, and household hygiene.

The report evaluates WHA78 as a period of broadening dialogue and significant policy adoption, notably the Global Action Plan on Climate and Health (GAP) and the first pandemic agreement. While it celebrates the inclusion of youth, persons with disabilities, and mental health in the agenda, it highlights critical shortcomings, including the absence of fossil fuel phase-out language and uncertainties regarding the implementation and funding of the GAP. The document advocates for a shift in narrative, framing climate action as a strategic health investment rather than a cost, and calls for greater inclusion of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and the Global South in leadership and R&D.

The WHO and Civil Society Working Group on Health and Climate Change urges medical educators to incorporate climate and health competencies into curricula to prepare healthcare workers for the impacts of environmental changes. The letter highlights a global lack of formal climate education for doctors and proposes specific actions, including increased funding and resource sharing. It provides examples of existing courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Kiribati, as well as global initiatives like the GCCHE core competencies.

An open letter from the Civil Society Working Group on Health and Climate Change calling for the integration of climate and health education into the curricula of all health professional training institutions to prepare the workforce for environmental and climate-related health risks.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group on Climate and Health Action calls for the mandatory integration of climate and health education into all health professional training to prepare the workforce for increasing environmental health risks. The letter highlights a global lack of institutional support and student-led initiatives as current drivers of such education. It proposes four key actions: incorporating core competencies into curricula, supporting multi-sectoral collaboration, increasing funding for research and education, and sharing resources. The document also lists existing educational examples, including specialized courses for the Caribbean and Latin America, and a 'core competencies' framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group on Climate and Health Action calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into medical and health professional curricula. The document argues that health professionals have an ethical duty to address climate-related health risks, noting that current training is often lacking or student-led. It proposes four key actions: integrating competencies into curricula and professional development, fostering multisectoral training, increasing funding for research and education, and sharing pedagogical resources. The letter includes an appendix of existing courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Switzerland, as well as a core competencies framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into medical and health professional education to ensure practitioners can respond to climate-related health risks. The letter highlights a global lack of such programs and institutional barriers, while providing a list of existing regional and global courses as models for implementation.

The document details the specific health impacts of fossil fuel exposure throughout the human lifespan, highlighting risks such as fetal development issues, childhood cognitive and respiratory damage, adolescent hormonal disruption, occupational hazards in adulthood, and increased chronic disease in the elderly.