Search Climate Insights Directory

This technical brief outlines a roadmap for Jharkhand to transition from a fossil-fuel-dependent economy to a green industrial hub. It estimates a peak state revenue loss of USD 1.43 billion per year and proposes a USD 41.4 billion investment across green molecules, sustainable mobility, and green equipment manufacturing to substitute these losses and create new employment opportunities through a three-phase strategic framework (2026-2070).

This executive summary from the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) analyzes the climate transition progress of 594 pension funds in OECD countries, representing USD 22.5 trillion in assets. Using the Net Zero Finance Tracker (NZFT), the report evaluates these funds across targets, implementation, and impact, highlighting a trend of increasing climate target adoption and improved risk management, while noting a persistent material exposure to fossil fuel expansion.

This policy brief by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) evaluates the financial and technical requirements for transitioning India's iron and steel (I&S) sector to low-carbon production. It proposes a Green Industrial Policy (GIP) combining targeted subsidies, carbon pricing, and green public procurement to shift the industry from carbon-intensive blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) pathways toward hydrogen-based direct reduced iron-electric arc furnace (DRI-EAF) systems by 2050.

The Climate Policy Initiative proposes a Just Transition Financing Framework (JTFF) to support Indian states, particularly Jharkhand, in transitioning from solid fossil fuels to a clean energy economy. The framework emphasizes a four-pronged approach: evidence-based policy making, capacity building for workers and officials, technical assistance for project bankability, and the mobilization of a blend of public and private capital. By establishing a governance structure involving a Ministerial Board and a Project Management Unit, the JTFF seeks to mitigate fiscal risks and socioeconomic disruptions while fostering green economic diversification.

This report by the Climate Policy Initiative and Climate Bonds Initiative analyzes the integration of methane abatement within five sustainable finance taxonomies (Colombia, EU, Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand). It identifies systemic gaps in sectoral coverage, technical rigor, and criteria specificity, and provides a best-practice framework to mobilize investment toward high-impact methane reduction.

This executive summary, published by the Climate Policy Initiative and Climate Bonds Initiative in December 2025, provides a framework of best-practice measures for incorporating methane abatement into sustainable finance taxonomies. It identifies critical gaps in current taxonomies and proposes science-based, investable criteria across four high-potential sectors: energy, agriculture, solid waste, and wastewater.

This report by the Climate Policy Initiative examines the operationalization of Standard 9 (Economic Diversification and Transformation) of the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) Just Transition Framework in two remote communities in Maluku, Indonesia: Air Buaya and Pasir Putih. The study focuses on transitioning these areas from diesel-based power to renewable energy while ensuring economic resilience, workforce protection, and the expansion of productive energy uses, particularly in the tuna fishery sector.

This research paper by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) proposes a quantitative approach to tracking the quality of public climate finance. It builds upon a three-level conceptual framework—project, market, and system levels—to identify practical indicators that can reduce subjectivity in quality judgments and improve coordination among public finance providers.

This report by the Climate Policy Initiative and the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero examines the critical role of equity and catalytic equity in closing the clean energy investment gap in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) to reach net zero goals by 2035.

The IDFC Green Finance Mapping 2025 executive summary reports that 23 member institutions committed USD 173 billion in green finance in 2024, a 13% decrease from 2023. While overall commitments fell, 14 of the 23 responding members increased their individual contributions. Climate finance dominated the total at 96% (USD 167 billion), with a significant 64% increase in adaptation finance to USD 17 billion, largely driven by the China Development Bank.

The Indonesia Power Sector Finance Dashboard (2019-2023) analyzes investment trends in renewable energy (RE) and fossil fuel (FF) power plants, highlighting a significant funding gap for 2030 climate targets and a continued reliance on fossil fuel investments, particularly for industrial captive power.

This report by the Climate Policy Initiative and Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro maps 30 international financial mechanisms designed to support tropical forests. It identifies a significant funding gap, noting that current mechanisms mobilize US$ 25.9 billion, which is far below the US$ 66.8 billion annually required by 2030 to unlock the full potential of tropical forests.

This document outlines the methodology used by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) to estimate bottom-up climate finance needs by collecting and standardizing data from Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). It distinguishes bottom-up needs—finance required by countries to reach national targets—from top-down needs, which are derived from predictive models to align with a 1.5°C pathway.

This technical brief describes Phase 2 of the Carbon Rating Framework developed by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). The framework aims to integrate emissions performance into financial decision-making by assigning a carbon rating (CR1–CR10) based on a company's emissions intensity relative to its revenue. Phase 2 involved testing the framework on a sample of 50 companies to validate its feasibility and ability to differentiate emissions performance across various sectors.

The 'Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2025: EMDE Spotlight' fact sheet analyzes climate finance flows to emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs). It reports that while total climate finance to these 157 countries surpassed USD 1 trillion in 2023, there remains a significant gap compared to the estimated USD 4 trillion required annually by 2030. The document highlights the dominance of China in overall flows, the growth of domestic private financing in emerging markets, and the persistent underfunding of adaptation and hard-to-abate sectors.

The Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2025 summary handout reports that global climate finance reached a record USD 1.9 trillion in 2023, driven largely by private sector growth. Despite this increase, a significant gap remains between current flows and the investment needed to meet global climate goals, with mitigation finance dominating the landscape while adaptation finance saw a decline in 2023.

The IDFC Green Finance Mapping Report 2025 analyzes the 2024 green finance commitments of 23 member national and regional development banks. While total green finance decreased by 13% to $173 billion, the majority of members increased their individual commitments. The report highlights a continued dominance of mitigation finance, a rebound in adaptation finance, and a growing but still limited focus on biodiversity and other environmental objectives.

This executive summary by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI/PUC-Rio) analyzes 30 international financial mechanisms designed to support tropical forests, focusing on conservation, restoration, and the reduction of deforestation. The report identifies a significant funding gap, noting that while current mechanisms mobilize US$ 25.9 billion, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) estimates a need for US$ 66.8 billion annually until 2030 to realize full forest potential.

The report identifies 30 international financial mechanisms mobilizing US$ 25.9 billion for tropical forests, though this remains far below the US$ 66.8 billion annual requirement estimated by UNEP. Financing is concentrated in conservation and is heavily skewed toward a few countries like Brazil and Guyana. While REDD+ mechanisms provide over half of the identified funding, there is a significant gap in the actual disbursement of planned funds, particularly from private and blended sources.

The report identifies 30 international financial mechanisms mobilizing US$ 25.9 billion for tropical forests, though this is far below the US$ 66.8 billion annual need estimated by UNEP for 2030. While Brazil and Guyana have high access to these funds, many high-potential countries remain underserved. Financing is dominated by credit, grants, and results-based payments (especially JREDD+), with a strong current focus on conservation over restoration and deforestation reduction.