Search Climate Insights Directory

The report examines the historical and current state of Indigenous participation in Canada's resource regulatory frameworks. It argues that while the transition to clean energy requires increased extraction of critical minerals on Indigenous lands, current regulatory processes—including the Impact Assessment Act—are often too complex, costly, and slow, failing to fully recognize Indigenous sovereignty. Through various case studies, the document highlights that successful projects are those based on genuine collaboration, modern treaties, and the recognition of Indigenous laws, rather than mere consultation. It recommends a shift toward Indigenous-led assessment and monitoring processes to ensure economic prosperity and environmental protection.

The report analyzes the challenges of decarbonizing Canada's critical minerals sector, noting that while Canada currently has a low-carbon advantage due to clean electricity grids, this edge may erode as other nations transition. It identifies three primary barriers: a lack of market demand for low-carbon minerals (no 'green premium'), fragmented supply chain infrastructure hindering traceability, and supply-side hurdles including the slow commercialization of electric ultra-class haul trucks and limited access to low-carbon power for off-grid mines. The author recommends a policy toolkit including the integration of emissions intensity into support programs, funding for R&D in technologies like direct lithium extraction, and the maintenance of large-emitter trading systems.

Ontario is well-positioned for the low-carbon transition due to its financial center and manufacturing expertise, but faces significant risks in its automotive and primary metals sectors. While the province leads Canada in the number of transition-opportunity companies, particularly in low-carbon electricity and batteries, progress is hindered by policy inconsistency and a lack of long-term sector-specific strategies. Workforce vulnerability is high in traditional manufacturing hubs, and high public debt may constrain the investment needed for a smooth transition.

Ontario is well-positioned for the carbon-neutral transition due to its financial hub status and concentration of clean energy and bio-product companies. However, it faces significant risks, including a high number of vulnerable workers in the manufacturing sector, high public debt, and policy instability. While major investments are occurring in electric vehicle production and steel electrification, the province lacks long-term sectoral policies and a clear carbon-neutral grid strategy, which may hinder large-scale technology adoption and competitiveness compared to other provinces.

The report examines how inadequate, overcrowded, and energy-inefficient housing contributes to poor clinical outcomes for Indigenous communities in Canada. It proposes a holistic 'healthy energy housing' approach that integrates energy efficiency and clean energy to improve physical and mental health, reduce the financial burden of energy poverty, and lower carbon emissions. The document highlights systemic governance failures and funding gaps, while showcasing community-led innovations as a path toward self-determination and reconciliation.

Quebec has successfully decoupled economic growth from greenhouse gas emissions, leveraging cheap hydroelectricity and a mature mining sector to foster transition-opportunity companies in electric vehicles and batteries. However, the province faces significant challenges, including high public debt (45% debt-to-GDP in 2020–21), workforce shortages in technical trades, and the need to rebuild trust with Indigenous Peoples to develop critical mineral projects. While Quebec attracts significant venture capital, its companies often raise less capital per investment stage than those in the US and the rest of Canada, facing stiff international competition from China and the US.

Québec is well-positioned for the energy transition due to its low-cost, low-carbon electricity and a mature mining sector for critical minerals. However, the province faces significant challenges, including a high public debt-to-GDP ratio of 45% (2020-2021), a shortage of skilled labor in clean-tech SMEs, and the need to rebuild trust with Indigenous peoples for new large-scale projects. While the province has a strong ecosystem of transition-supporting companies—particularly in electric transport and industrial transition—it faces intense global competition from the US, EU, and China, and its firms often secure less capital at each funding stage compared to US counterparts.

The Canadian Climate Institute has implemented a series of organizational changes to integrate Indigenous perspectives into its climate research and governance. These include creating a leadership role for Indigenous research, establishing cultural leave policies, and implementing an Indigenous peer-review process based on respect, relevance, reciprocity, and responsibility. The Institute also focuses on amplifying Indigenous climate leadership through case studies, research partnerships, and the adoption of guidelines from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The report examines the intersection of flood risk transparency and social equity in Canada, arguing that current practices in mapping, disclosure, and risk-based pricing often marginalize vulnerable populations. It highlights how systemic inequalities, such as the forced relocation of Indigenous communities to floodplains, increase climate vulnerability. The authors propose a transition toward 'transformational adaptation' through inclusive mapping, standardized disclosure laws for renters and buyers, and affordable, public insurance programs that support strategic retreat rather than just rebuilding in high-risk areas.

The document analyzes how climate change and the transition to net zero impact the reliability and resilience of Canada's electricity grid. It identifies risks across generation, transmission, and distribution, and proposes solutions such as infrastructure hardening, increasing system flexibility, and updating regulatory frameworks and building codes.

The document analyzes how climate change and the transition to a carbon-neutral economy threaten the resilience of Canada's electrical grids. It details risks to power generation, transmission, and distribution, while highlighting the danger of 'cascading effects' where power failures disrupt other essential services. The paper proposes mitigation strategies including infrastructure hardening, increasing grid flexibility through energy storage and decentralized resources, and improving energy efficiency. It also identifies systemic obstacles, such as regulatory frameworks that prioritize short-term reliability over long-term resilience and outdated building codes based on historical rather than future climate data.

The document argues that while Canada possesses a competitive advantage in clean energy, its electricity grids are often optimized for legacy technologies and lack sufficient planning for industrial growth. It compares Ontario, Alberta, Quebec, and British Columbia with international peers, highlighting that hydro-dominant provinces have a flexibility advantage, while others must proactively develop storage and interconnections. The report recommends that the federal government support interprovincial planning, provide targeted funding for grid development, ensure climate policy stability, and prioritize grid flexibility to avoid wasting renewable energy and to attract global capital.

Saskatchewan faces significant economic risks due to its reliance on oil and gas, with 6% of its workforce in transition-vulnerable sectors. While the province has strengths in agricultural technology, critical minerals, and renewable energy potential, it lags behind other Canadian provinces in attracting transition-consistent investment. Growth is concentrated in Saskatoon and Regina, primarily within ag-tech and alternative proteins. Barriers to scaling include a lack of early-stage policy support, low R&D funding, and continued subsidies for fossil fuels, which create uncertainty for clean-tech investors.

Saskatchewan faces significant economic risks due to its heavy reliance on the oil and gas sector, which generated 16% of its provincial GDP in 2019. While the province possesses strong competitive advantages in wind, solar, and critical minerals, it lags behind other Canadian provinces in attracting transition-related investments. Most current growth is concentrated in agtech and alternative proteins, while public and private funding for broader research and development remains limited. The report highlights a critical need for more ambitious climate policies and better support for workforce transition, particularly in small communities like Coronach, to avoid severe economic decline.

The Canadian North faces a dual crisis of inadequate existing infrastructure and a climate warming three times faster than the global average. Permafrost thaw, extreme weather, and unpredictable ice and snow conditions are damaging airstrips, roads, and building foundations, while threatening winter road viability and coastal communities. The report argues that simple repairs are insufficient due to historical underinvestment and neglect; instead, it calls for transformational adaptation based on Indigenous self-determination. Key recommendations include restructuring federal funding, improving region-specific climate risk data, prioritizing infrastructure replacement over repair, and updating building codes to account for northern climate complexities.

The Canadian Climate Institute warns that current zoning and policy gaps could lead to over 760,000 new homes being built in high-risk flood and wildfire areas by 2030, potentially costing billions in annual damages. The report argues that redirecting just 3% of planned housing (approximately 150,000 units) away from the most vulnerable areas could reduce new flood risks by nearly 80%. Key recommendations include strengthening provincial land-use regulations, updating risk maps, mandating risk disclosure in real estate transactions, and reforming disaster assistance to remove moral hazard.

The document evaluates three frameworks for climate milestone implementation: where milestones are bound (national, provincial/territorial, or sectoral levels), how the pathway is determined (by provinces/territories, collectively, by the federal government, or by an expert body), and which government order drives policy development (federal, collaborative with a federal backstop, or provincial/territorial). It weighs the trade-offs between national consistency, regional flexibility, and the likelihood of achieving long-term targets.

The document analyzes four international policy mechanisms—US hydrogen tax credits, Norway's carbon capture and storage in the North Sea, the UK's Contracts for Difference for renewable electricity, and Australia's Green Bank—to derive strategic lessons for Canada's clean energy transition. It evaluates the strengths, limitations, and applicable lessons of each approach, focusing on reducing financial risk, leveraging comparative advantages, and ensuring cost-efficiency in public spending.

The report details the use of the North American TIMES Energy Model (NATEM) to identify the most cost-effective technology combinations for decarbonizing Canada's building sector. It establishes a core 'Optimal NZ50' scenario targeting 440 Mt of emissions in 2030 and 10 Mt by 2050, while outlining seven sensitivity analyses covering heat pump costs, retrofit levels, and hydrogen integration. The modelling accounts for regional differences across 13 jurisdictions, incorporating detailed load curves, climate change temperature forecasts, and a comprehensive database of over 7,000 technologies.

The report examines the intersection of flood risk transparency and social equity in Canada, arguing that current practices in mapping, disclosure, and pricing often disproportionately disadvantage marginalized communities. It highlights gaps in map availability for rural and remote areas, ambiguities in real estate disclosure, and the risk of 'bluelining' or 'degentrification' where equity-deserving groups are trapped in high-risk areas due to financial constraints. The authors recommend accelerating co-developed flood mapping, standardizing disclosure requirements for rentals and real estate, and implementing affordability assessments in the forthcoming national public flood insurance program to support just climate adaptation.