Search Climate Insights Directory

The assessment finds that while over USD 4.1 billion has been committed to results-based REDD+ payments, disbursements remain limited and concentrated, primarily in Brazil. It highlights the emergence of jurisdictional-sourcing initiatives across Asia, Latin America, and Africa as a promising mechanism to scale zero-deforestation commitments, though private resource flows remain small.

The Climate Smart Cattle Ranching (CSCR) initiative proposes a 'New Company' to address barriers to sustainable beef production in Brazil, specifically targeting mid-sized ranchers in the Amazon who lack formal land titles. The model uses a blended finance approach—initially through a Participations Investment Fund (FIP) involving grants, concessional debt, and impact equity—to co-invest in pasture restoration and the adoption of Embrapa’s Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). By providing long-term capital (up to 10 years) and continuous technical assistance, the instrument aims to increase productivity from 0.5-0.7 to up to 4 Animal Units per hectare, potentially reducing emissions intensity by 90-95% per kg of beef. The strategy includes a phase-out of concessional capital in favor of commercial investment via a Credits’ Rights Investment Fund (FIDC) once a track record of receivables from deforestation-free beef off-take agreements is established.

The document examines 'jurisdictional approaches' to deforestation, which align governments, businesses, and NGOs around shared conservation and sustainable development goals. Based on a workshop of practitioners from five initiatives, it identifies key success factors including political leadership, participatory design, and sustainable financing. It highlights the challenge of aligning short-term corporate and government expectations with the long-term systemic change required for landscape-scale forest loss reduction.

The report examines jurisdictional approaches to deforestation, emphasizing the necessity of political leadership, participatory design, and diverse financing. Through case studies in Brazil, Liberia, Ghana, and Colombia, it argues that while these models are nascent and complex, they offer a systemic way to align market forces and government policy to achieve landscape-scale conservation.

The document analyzes the deep-rooted insecurity of rural property rights in Brazil, attributing it to a complex history of disordered land occupation and an inefficient, fragmented governance system. It highlights how this insecurity fuels land conflicts, deforestation, and under-developed rental markets. The report identifies four primary challenges: institutional complexity, the lack of a unified national land registry, bureaucratic regularization processes, and ineffective enforcement of existing rights. It evaluates current initiatives like the Terra Legal program and the SIG-Fundiário pilot, and proposes a series of recommendations across governance, law enforcement, regulation, and knowledge production to secure land tenure and enhance the implementation of the Forest Code.

The report examines Brazil's complex rural land tenure system, tracing its origins from colonial 'sesmarias' to the current framework. It highlights how institutional complexity, the lack of a unified land cadastre, and weak enforcement contribute to land conflicts, deforestation, and inefficient land use. The document evaluates current initiatives like the Terra Legal Program and the SIG-Fundiário system, concluding with recommendations to streamline regularization, centralize registries under the CNIR, and clarify the application of the Forest Code to collective lands.

The paper finds that Rural Settlements were responsible for 30% of total deforestation in the Amazon Biome in 2014. While traditional and colonization settlements showed only a correlation with deforestation due to their location on the agricultural frontier, 'Special Settlements'—those with environmental conditions—had a statistically significant positive impact on deforestation. This is attributed to their placement in remote, high-forest-coverage areas where any clearing for agricultural production represents a significant increase in local deforestation rates.

The report provides a comprehensive overview of Brazil's rural land tenure system, tracing its history from colonial sesmarias to the 1988 Constitution. It highlights a fragmented system of multiple rural registries and cadastres that lack integration, which facilitates 'grilagem' (illegal land grabbing). The document details the specific regularization processes and obstacles for five key land categories: Indigenous Lands, quilombola territories, Conservation Units, agrarian reform settlements, and individual possessions on federal lands. It concludes by analyzing the complexities of implementing the 2012 Forest Code, particularly the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR), in the context of collective land tenure and overlapping territorial claims.

The report argues that Brazil's insecure land rights lead to significant rural conflicts, deforestation, and economic inefficiencies. It highlights a systemic failure in land governance characterized by institutional complexity, unreliable registries, and the absence of an integrated database for public and private lands. These issues are exacerbated by the 'social function of property' requirement, which can incentivize land clearing to prove productivity and legitimize illegal land grabbing (grilagem).

The report argues that Brazil lags globally in property rights protection, leading to severe consequences including land-related violence, deforestation, and inefficient land use. It highlights a systemic failure in land governance characterized by institutional complexity, unreliable registration systems, and the absence of an integrated database for public and private lands. The document specifically notes that insecurity encourages deforestation as a means to prove land productivity to avoid expropriation and suppresses the land rental market due to legal and social distrust.

Between 2004 and 2012, Brazil's Amazon deforestation rates fell by nearly 80%, but the nature of the clearings shifted. While large-scale deforestation was curtailed by remote sensing-based monitoring, small-scale clearings (25 hectares or less) grew from 25% to over 50% of overall annual clearings because they are difficult for current systems to detect. Analysis of Mato Grosso and Pará shows that landholders adapted their behavior to avoid detection, with smallholders in Pará emerging as primary agents of clearing. The report recommends enhancing monitoring technology and tailoring policies to regional differences.

The research finds that while centralized conservation policies successfully reduced medium- and large-scale deforestation in both Mato Grosso and Pará, the impact on small-scale deforestation varied by state. In Mato Grosso, large landowners adapted by clearing forest in smaller patches to elude the DETER monitoring system, which cannot detect clearings under 25 hectares. In Pará, smallholders were more persistent in deforesting because their clearings were predominantly smaller than 25 hectares and thus remained invisible to law enforcement. The authors argue that the apparent similarity in deforestation scale across states masks critical differences in the agents involved, necessitating tailored regional policies.

Between 2004 and 2012, annual deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell from 27,000 km2 to 4,500 km2, largely due to conservation policies and remote sensing monitoring. However, these systems cannot detect clearings of 25 hectares or less, leading to a shift where small-scale deforestation grew from a quarter to more than half of overall annual clearings. Research in Mato Grosso and Pará shows that medium- and large-scale property holders adapted to enforcement by shifting to smaller clearings, while smallholders in Pará emerged as the primary agents of forest clearing. The brief recommends enhancing monitoring technology and tailoring policies to regional differences to address these evolving patterns.

The research finds that an increase in relative soy to beef prices encourages the conversion of pasture to cropland, which in turn reduces local deforestation. This effect is attributed to the higher input intensity of crop cultivation compared to cattle ranching, which increases local input prices and displaces low-productivity cattle ranchers. The author estimates that this land conversion saved 5,300 square kilometers of forest, representing nearly 15% of the region's total deforestation during the study period.

The study finds that while agricultural prices drive deforestation, conservation policies implemented in 2004 and 2008 significantly curbed forest loss. Counterfactual simulations estimate that these policies avoided approximately 73,000 square kilometers of deforestation from 2005 to 2009, equivalent to 2.7 billion tonnes of stored carbon dioxide. The analysis indicates that the deforestation slowdown did not result in a major downturn for the local agricultural sector or municipal GDP per capita.

In early 2011, the state of Mato Grosso passed a zoning law (ZSEE) that opened 50,000 km2 of forest for agriculture, leading to a documented 500 percent spike in deforestation within one month. A campaign led by the Instituto Centro de Vida (ICV), supported by WRI's governance assessment tools, utilized evidence-based advocacy to prompt a February 2012 injunction by the State Court and a March 2012 order from Brazil’s Federal Zoning Commission to redraft the legislation.

The Grupo André Maggi used the five-step Corporate Ecosystem Services Review (ESR) to analyze energy supply risks at its Itacoatiara plant. The process identified critical dependencies on biomass, fresh water, local climate, soil erosion regulation, and habitat health. The company found that while biomass is a low-carbon energy source, its supply is threatened by illegal logging, climate-induced droughts affecting river transport, and regulatory hurdles for reforestation. To mitigate these risks, the company is exploring internal reforestation projects and evaluating alternative biomass sources, while preparing for a partial transition to grid electricity by 2015 for power generation, though biomass will remain essential for grain drying.

The document examines how DFI lending through financial intermediaries (FIs) reduces transparency, weakens environmental and social safeguards, and often fails to reach the poorest populations compared to direct investment. It highlights specific cases of land disputes and environmental degradation in India and Brazil, and recommends that DFIs prioritize local ownership, increase public disclosure of sub-projects, and implement stricter due diligence focused on development impact.

The study analyzes the drivers of reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon from 2000 to 2010, specifically comparing the impact of agricultural prices against conservation policies introduced in 2004 and 2008. Using regression techniques and counterfactual simulation, the research finds that conservation policies were responsible for preventing the deforestation of approximately 62,000 square kilometers between 2005 and 2009. This is equivalent to preserving 620 million tons of stored carbon, valued at an estimated 11.5 billion USD. While crop prices generally correlate positively with deforestation, cattle prices show a more complex, heterogeneous effect. The document concludes that while market conditions played a role, the strategic policy interventions—including improved monitoring via DETER, the expansion of protected areas, and stricter rural credit requirements—were the decisive factors in slowing forest loss.

The analysis concludes that conservation policies implemented in 2004 and 2008 were effective in curbing deforestation in the Brazilian Legal Amazon, accounting for approximately half of the avoided deforestation between 2005 and 2009. While agricultural crop prices showed a positive causal effect on deforestation, the impact of livestock prices was heterogeneous. The policies prevented the loss of 62,000 km² of forest, equivalent to 620 million tons of carbon storage, with an estimated value of 11.5 billion USD (though one section mentions 3.1 billion USD). Key policy interventions included the PPCDAm, real-time satellite monitoring (DETER), the creation of protected areas, and conditional credit requirements for agricultural activities.