Search Climate Insights Directory

The Amazon Food&Forest Bioeconomy Financing Initiative addresses financial barriers facing Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs) in the Brazilian Amazon through a proprietary fintech platform and a blended finance structure. The initiative combines private debentures (senior and subordinated tranches) with a philanthropic fund to provide growth capital and discounted invoices to regenerative businesses. Currently in a pilot phase with 17 projects and USD 2.7 million deployed, the initiative aims to raise USD 23.12 million in its market phase to scale activities across value chains such as non-timber forest products (NTFPs), community-based tourism, and agroforestry. The goal is to mitigate land-use emissions, protect biodiversity, and improve local livelihoods while attracting commercial private capital to the region's socio-bioeconomy.

The document outlines three main sets of proposals to align Brazil's agricultural credit and insurance systems with climate goals. It advocates for increasing funding for the ABC+ and PRONAF ABC+ programs, restricting credit to properties with illegal deforestation or environmental embargoes, and improving rural insurance through the Rural Insurance Premium Subsidies Program (PSR) and the implementation of ZARC Stewardship Levels. Additionally, it suggests redirecting 10% of Constitutional Financing Funds (FCFs) toward sustainable practices and harmonizing these funds with the National Rural Credit System.

The analysis identifies three priority strategies for the Brazilian government: federal prioritization of rural settlements, state-led implementation of the Forest Code on private lands, and joint efforts for territorial zoning of undesignated public areas. Between 2012 and 2021, federal public areas and private properties were the primary sites of forest loss, accounting for 45% and 28% of deforested areas, respectively. The study highlights a significant acceleration of deforestation in federal public areas and areas with no land tenure data between 2018 and 2021, increasing by 91% and 74% respectively. Geographically, the states of Pará, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, and Rondônia are the most affected, with five states together accounting for 95% of the deforested area in the biome. The report emphasizes that effective protection requires improving public data quality and coordinating federal support for state-level enforcement of the Forest Code.

The report identifies that deforestation in the Amazon biome is heavily concentrated in federal public areas and private properties, with a significant acceleration in both since 2019. It argues that the federal government should prioritize rural settlements and the regularization of undesignated public forests, while state governments should focus on implementing the Forest Code on private lands. The analysis emphasizes that coordination between these two levels of government is essential for territorial ordering and effective environmental enforcement.

The report analyzes deforestation in the Amazon biome from 2012 to 2021, highlighting that federal public lands and private areas accounted for 45% and 28% of deforestation, respectively. It argues for a coordinated strategy where the federal government focuses on rural settlements and land tenure regularization, while state governments prioritize the implementation of the Forest Code on private lands. The study emphasizes a recent acceleration of deforestation in federal lands and areas without land tenure information, particularly from 2019 onwards, and calls for improved public data integration to enhance transparency and effectiveness.

The report assesses gender inequalities in Colombia, specifically within the Amazon biome, to inform a Gender Action Plan for a REDD+ project implemented by FAO and the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development. It identifies significant gaps in land ownership, labor market participation, and decision-making power for rural and indigenous women. The document outlines a strategy to mainstream gender by promoting women's leadership in forest management, recognizing ancestral knowledge in food security and biodiversity, and implementing differential quotas for participation.

The memorandum establishes a partnership between SP/OTCA and IAI to strengthen regional capacities and scientific research in the Amazon Biome, focusing on climate change, biodiversity, and the rights of indigenous and local communities.

The paper finds that Rural Settlements were responsible for 30% of total deforestation in the Amazon Biome in 2014. While traditional and colonization settlements showed only a correlation with deforestation due to their location on the agricultural frontier, 'Special Settlements'—those with environmental conditions—had a statistically significant positive impact on deforestation. This is attributed to their placement in remote, high-forest-coverage areas where any clearing for agricultural production represents a significant increase in local deforestation rates.

The report evaluates the 'Priority Municipalities' (MPs) policy in Brazil, which blacklisted municipalities with high deforestation rates to target law enforcement. The study finds that the policy significantly reduced deforestation in the Amazon, avoiding the clearing of 11,359 km2 of forest between 2008 and 2011. This reduction was primarily driven by increased monitoring and law enforcement, such as a 10% increase in fines, while having no negative impact on agricultural GDP, crop production, or credit concessions.

The study finds that Resolution 3.545, which conditioned rural credit on environmental compliance, significantly reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon Biome. By restricting access to subsidized credit, the policy prevented the clearing of over 2,700 km2 of forest between 2009 and 2011, primarily affecting livestock-oriented regions where producers are more credit-constrained.

The study finds that Resolution 3.545, which required proof of environmental compliance for rural credit, significantly reduced deforestation in the Amazon Biome. The policy prevented the loss of over 2,700 km² of forest by restricting approximately R$ 2.9 billion in credit. This effect was most pronounced in cattle-ranching municipalities, suggesting that livestock producers are more credit-constrained and dependent on subsidized loans to expand production into forested areas compared to agricultural producers.

The study finds that Resolution 3.545, which conditioned rural credit on environmental compliance, effectively reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon by restricting funds, particularly for large-scale cattle ranching. Between 2008 and 2011, the policy led to a reduction of approximately 2.9 billion BRL in rural credit, preventing the clearing of over 2,700 km² of forest. The impact was most significant in cattle-dominated municipalities, suggesting that ranchers are more credit-constrained and dependent on subsidized loans for land expansion than crop farmers.