Search Climate Insights Directory

The report by Climate Action Against Disinformation (CAAD) analyzes ten 'misleading claims' used by fossil fuel interests to delay the energy transition. It argues that fossil fuels are the primary driver of climate change, with 36.6 billion tonnes of the 40.5 billion global CO2 emissions in 2022 originating from their use. The document debunks claims that emissions—rather than fossil fuels themselves—are the problem, and challenges the industry's focus on Scope 1 and 2 emissions, noting that Scope 3 emissions account for 80-95% of total carbon emissions for oil and gas companies. It further critiques technological 'solutions' like Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), Direct Air Capture (DAC), e-fuels, and 'blue' hydrogen, characterizing them as expensive, inefficient, or unproven at the scale required to limit warming to 1.5C. Finally, it argues that fossil fuel reliance hinders economic growth in Africa and Asia and exacerbates the global cost-of-living crisis.

The document examines the implementation of Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) programs to reduce fugitive methane emissions, focusing on ground-based Optical Gas Imaging (OGI) surveys. It analyzes the relationship between inspection frequency and emission reductions, providing cost estimates for in-house versus outsourced detection models. The analysis highlights that abatement costs vary by country based on the value of salable gas and local market constraints, with some regions achieving negative marginal abatement costs. Key barriers to deployment include a lack of local technical capacity, logistical constraints in remote areas, and high costs associated with imported equipment.

The document evaluates the installation of Vapor Recovery Units (VRUs) to capture hydrocarbon vapors from storage tanks, finding that while they typically reduce emissions by 95%, high upfront capital costs and infrastructure gaps limit adoption. Across the studied countries in Africa and Latin America, VRUs remain below a low-cost threshold of 596 USD/tCH4, though cost-effectiveness varies based on the volume of methane emitted per site.

The document describes the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) as a graphical tool that ranks greenhouse gas mitigation options by cost and abatement potential to support policy prioritization. It details a four-step construction process involving the calculation of abatement potential and marginal abatement cost (based on Net Present Value), and provides guidance on interpreting negative and positive costs to determine appropriate financing mechanisms. The text also warns that MACCs are static representations that ignore interactions between options, exclude societal co-benefits, and mask the distinction between upfront CAPEX and ongoing OPEX.

The waste sector is the third largest source of human-driven methane emissions, contributing 18% of global anthropogenic methane in 2020, with municipal solid waste accounting for 11% and wastewater for 7%. Mitigation efforts are currently hindered by a lack of data on landfills and dumpsites and limited access to evidence-based best practices. To address this, the Clean Air Task Force and RMI are launching the Waste Methane Assessment Platform (Waste MAP), an open-source online tool designed to improve data availability, provide a heat map of emissions, and offer strategic playbooks for mitigation. In 2023, the initiative includes engagement in six countries: Mexico, Colombia, and Ecuador (via CATF), and India, Nigeria, and the United States (via RMI), providing technical assistance and capacity building to help these nations meet the Global Methane Pledge and other greenhouse gas targets.

The Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN) provides research, technical assistance, and knowledge dissemination to help developing countries integrate low-carbon and resilient growth into their national policies. Funded by the UK's DFID and the Netherlands' DGIS, CDKN focuses on four strategic themes: climate-compatible development plans, improving access to climate finance, disaster risk management, and supporting negotiators from the least developed and most vulnerable countries. The organization operates in over 40 countries across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, aiming to improve the quality of life for those most affected by climate change through a demand-driven approach.

The report details how phthalates, used as plasticizers in a wide array of consumer and industrial products, act as endocrine disruptors and carcinogens. It highlights the vulnerability of children and fetuses, the risks to occupational workers, and the systemic failure to provide information or remedies to those exposed. The document links these health impacts to violations of international human rights frameworks, such as the ICCPR and CESCR, and notes that while some restrictions exist in the EU and US, DEHP remains widely used globally, particularly in the Global South.

The report details how phthalates, used as plasticizers in PVC and other products, act as endocrine disruptors linked to reproductive toxicity, cancer, and developmental issues. It argues that ubiquitous exposure through food, water, indoor air, and medical devices infringes upon human rights, particularly for vulnerable groups like children and workers, and highlights the lack of adequate product labeling and legal remedies for victims.

The report examines the critical role of land and resource tenure in community-based conservation, contrasting the often-destructive nature of state-owned 'public' tenure with the adaptive and sustainable characteristics of community-based systems. It argues that when states delegitimize local tenure, they often create 'open access' conditions that lead to biodiversity loss and resource pillaging. Conversely, secure community tenure—characterized by flexible, overlapping rights and deep ecological knowledge—tends to support long-term resource stability. The authors advocate for the official state recognition of community perimeters rather than the detailed codification of customary laws, which can disrupt local flexibility. While acknowledging that tenure alone does not guarantee conservation success, the text concludes that the erosion of community rights is a primary driver of environmental degradation in many developing nations.

The report examines 38 cases of international arbitration brought by mining companies against Latin American states, highlighting a pattern where corporate legal protections are used to bypass national courts and penalize governments for implementing public health, environmental, or indigenous rights policies. It identifies Canada as a primary source of mining investment and litigation in the region and argues that the current ISDS framework creates a 'chilling effect' on democratic regulation. The document details specific cases in countries such as El Salvador, Colombia, and Venezuela, and proposes a shift toward a legal framework that prioritizes human rights and environmental protection over investor profits.

The CONNECT 2026 sponsorship brochure details a series of global events designed to bring together senior leaders from the sustainable finance sector to address the climate crisis. The events target a diverse audience of investors, governments, and regulators, with 2025 attendance reaching 1,540 professionals. Sponsorship tiers include Platinum, Gold, Lunch supporter, Awards Drinks and Canape supporter, Exhibitor, and Associate, offering benefits such as speaking slots, branding, and conference registrations. The series also includes the announcement of Climate Bonds Awards.

The briefing argues that the EU must move beyond simply cleaning up its own supply chains to create 'win-win' Forest Partnerships with developing countries. These partnerships should address root causes of deforestation—such as poverty and weak land tenure—while supporting Indigenous Peoples, small-scale producers, and nature-based solutions to meet Paris Agreement and CBD objectives. The authors recommend leveraging the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) for funding and using 'Forest Diplomacy' to encourage other major consuming regions to adopt similar measures.

The report by ClientEarth and Global Witness advocates for a comprehensive EU-wide mandatory due diligence framework to replace failing voluntary corporate commitments. It highlights the EU's role in driving global deforestation and human rights abuses, particularly in the agricultural sector. The authors propose a system based on OECD Guidelines that covers all EU-based companies and investors, regardless of size, and includes strict transparency requirements, a robust penalty regime, and access to justice for affected parties outside the EU.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group to Advance Action on Climate Change and Health calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into all health professional education, citing a global lack of such programs and institutional barriers. The letter advocates for updated curricula, increased funding for research, and multi-sectoral collaboration to build resilient, low-carbon health systems. It provides an appendix of existing global resources, including courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Kiribati, as well as core competency frameworks developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The document lists several climate and health educational initiatives, including certificate courses for health professionals in the Caribbean and Latin America, a Planetary Health MOOC from Brazil, and a 'Core Competencies' framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education (GCCHE).

The WHO and Civil Society Working Group on Health and Climate Change urges medical educators to incorporate climate and health competencies into curricula to prepare healthcare workers for the impacts of environmental changes. The letter highlights a global lack of formal climate education for doctors and proposes specific actions, including increased funding and resource sharing. It provides examples of existing courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Kiribati, as well as global initiatives like the GCCHE core competencies.

An open letter from the Civil Society Working Group on Health and Climate Change calling for the integration of climate and health education into the curricula of all health professional training institutions to prepare the workforce for environmental and climate-related health risks.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group on Climate and Health Action calls for the mandatory integration of climate and health education into all health professional training to prepare the workforce for increasing environmental health risks. The letter highlights a global lack of institutional support and student-led initiatives as current drivers of such education. It proposes four key actions: incorporating core competencies into curricula, supporting multi-sectoral collaboration, increasing funding for research and education, and sharing resources. The document also lists existing educational examples, including specialized courses for the Caribbean and Latin America, and a 'core competencies' framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group on Climate and Health Action calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into medical and health professional curricula. The document argues that health professionals have an ethical duty to address climate-related health risks, noting that current training is often lacking or student-led. It proposes four key actions: integrating competencies into curricula and professional development, fostering multisectoral training, increasing funding for research and education, and sharing pedagogical resources. The letter includes an appendix of existing courses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Brazil, and Switzerland, as well as a core competencies framework developed by the Global Consortium on Climate and Health Education.

The WHO-Civil Society Working Group calls for the systemic integration of climate and health competencies into medical and health professional education to ensure practitioners can respond to climate-related health risks. The letter highlights a global lack of such programs and institutional barriers, while providing a list of existing regional and global courses as models for implementation.