Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that Africa's regional integration efforts have largely failed because they were based on an ideological Pan-Africanist model that prioritised politics over economics and ignored the necessity of domestic stability. The author contends that continental success is impossible without first achieving national success through bold economic reforms, the rule of law, and democratisation. While some Regional Economic Communities (RECs) like Comesa and the EAC show promise, the paper highlights systemic hurdles including overlapping memberships, weak institutional capacity, and a lack of political will to cede sovereignty. It advocates for 'developmental regionalism'—focusing on infrastructure and supply-side constraints—and an outward-looking approach that attracts foreign direct investment (FDI) and integrates Africa into the global market.

The briefing analyzes the EC-Biotech dispute, where a WTO panel rejected the obligation to consider the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety because they were not ratified by all WTO Members. The author argues this narrow interpretation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties creates 'clinical isolation' for WTO law and deviates from the Appellate Body's approach in US-Shrimp, which integrated sustainable development and MEAs into its analysis. The document emphasizes that the WTO's own Committee on Trade and Environment and the Doha Mandate support 'mutual supportiveness' between trade and environmental goals.

The IAI Directorate report for 2006-2007 outlines the institute's efforts to integrate global change science with policy, specifically focusing on land-use change in the La Plata Basin and the impacts of biofuels. The report highlights the implementation of Collaborative Research Networks (CRN I and II), the success of Training Institute Seed Grants (TISG) in fostering multidisciplinary networks across 19 countries, and new strategic partnerships with organizations like IDRC, NCAR, and the Asia-Pacific Network. It also details capacity-building efforts through summer schools and internships, and fundraising initiatives targeting the MacArthur Foundation for biodiversity research in the Andes.

The IAI Executive Directorate report for 2006-2007 details the institute's efforts to integrate climate science with policy, specifically focusing on land-use change in the Plata Basin and urbanisation in Latin America. It highlights the transition from the CRN I to CRN II research networks, the success of the Training Institute Seed Grants (TISG) in fostering multidisciplinary networks across 19 countries, and new strategic partnerships with organizations like IDRC, SCOPE, and the MacArthur Foundation to address biodiversity in the Andes.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) requests a core budget of US$ 1,014,931 for fiscal year 2007/2008, a level consistent with the previous two years. The budget supports the Directorate's operations, including the management of the CRN II Program, the implementation of the Small Grants Program for the Human Dimensions (SGP-HD), and the development of a new IAI Strategic Plan. A significant portion of the budget is allocated to salaries and benefits, with proposed adjustments to compensate for the loss of purchasing power of the US dollar against the Brazilian Real. The budget is funded by contributions from member countries, with the United States providing the largest share at US$ 595,000.

The IAI's central budget request for 2007/2008 is US$1,014,931, maintaining a stable funding level compared to previous years. The budget supports the administration of the CRN II program, the implementation of the Small Grants Program for Human Dimensions (SGP-HD) with a US$800,000 budget, and the development of a new Strategic Plan to link science with policy. Key financial adjustments include proposed salary increases for international staff to offset the loss of purchasing power caused by inflation and exchange rate fluctuations in Brazil. Member contributions are led by the United States (US$595,000) and Canada (US$125,000).

The document discusses the EC-Biotech dispute and the European Communities' argument that WTO agreements should be interpreted in light of international law and multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), such as the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, particularly regarding the precautionary principle and risk assessment for GMOs.

The report presents a business case for Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), arguing that failing to secure community approval creates significant financial, operational, and reputational risks. Through four case studies in the Philippines, Argentina, Thailand, and Peru, it demonstrates that while FPIC requires an iterative process of information sharing and negotiation, the costs are minimal compared to the potential losses from project delays, asset write-downs, and lost revenues. The authors recommend that project sponsors, financiers, and host governments integrate FPIC into their decision-making and permitting processes to avoid costly conflicts.

The document is a formal cover letter dated April 4, 2007, accompanying an amicus curiae brief submitted to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) by a coalition of organizations including the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and the Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS). The brief concerns the legal dispute between the Argentine Republic and water companies Suez and Vivendi Universal, specifically highlighting the public interest involved in the provision of essential drinking water and sanitation services.

The brief contends that Argentina's decision to freeze water tariffs during its 2001 economic crisis was a necessary action to ensure the human right to water, which is protected under various international treaties and the Argentine Constitution. It argues that human rights law should inform the adjudication of the dispute, specifically regarding 'fair and equitable treatment' and 'indirect expropriation' standards in BITs. The authors assert that investors cannot legitimately expect a state to disregard its human rights obligations, and that measures taken to protect public health fall under the 'police powers' of the state, thus precluding them from being classified as compensable expropriations.

The document argues that Argentina's 2001 emergency measures to freeze water tariffs during a severe economic crisis were consistent with its international human rights obligations to ensure access to water. It contends that human rights law should inform the interpretation of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), specifically regarding 'fair and equitable treatment' and 'indirect expropriation'. The brief asserts that the right to water is a prerequisite for the right to life and health, and that state police powers to protect public health justify regulatory changes that may affect investor profits without requiring compensation.

The report examines how the consolidation of the global supermarket sector has shifted power to a few major retailers, creating a 'buyer-driven' commodity chain that often marginalizes smallholder farmers. While the fresh fruit and vegetable (FFV) sector offers growth potential for developing countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, supermarkets' stringent private standards and aggressive business practices create high barriers to entry. However, the report argues that smallholders maintain comparative advantages in labour-intensive and organic production. It suggests that cooperatives, outgrower schemes, and public-private partnerships can help smallholders overcome scale and infrastructure problems to access these lucrative markets.

The ICSID Tribunal granted five non-governmental organizations permission to file a joint amicus curiae submission in the case of Suez et al. v. Argentina, finding that the dispute involves significant public interest regarding water and sewage services in Buenos Aires. While the Tribunal affirmed the suitability of the petitioners based on their expertise in human rights and the environment, it denied their request for unrestricted access to arbitration documents, ruling that they possessed sufficient information from other sources to provide the necessary perspectives without the record.

The policy brief by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) proposes specific amendments to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules to distinguish 'State arbitrations' from private commercial ones. The authors argue that because State arbitrations often involve public funds, governmental misconduct, and critical public policy issues—such as drinking water systems or hazardous waste bans—they require higher standards of transparency. The brief proposes revisions to four articles to ensure public notice of proceedings, open hearings, public access to awards and documents, and the explicit ability for tribunals to accept amicus curiae briefs.

The report assesses the first decade of GM crop commercialization, focusing on soy, maize, cotton, and rapeseed. It argues that the promised benefits—such as increased yields and reduced pesticide use—are largely myths. In the US, it notes that GM crops have not increased potential yields and have actually increased overall agrochemical use. In South America, specifically Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay, the expansion of GM soy is linked to deforestation and increased pesticide use, with GM varieties showing higher susceptibility to drought than conventional ones. In Asia and Africa, the report highlights the failure of Bt cotton in China, India, and Indonesia, citing the emergence of secondary pests and increased farmer indebtedness. It concludes that the primary beneficiary of this technology is Monsanto, which has consolidated control over the global seed market, while small farmers face increased dependency and economic risk.

The Russian Federation proposed a two-track approach to climate targets: a 'Kyoto track' to simplify the bureaucratic process for countries joining Annex B, and a 'Convention track' to recognize and incentivize voluntary targets by Non-Annex I countries through finance and technology transfer. While Annex B parties generally supported the simplification of accession procedures, Non-Annex I countries expressed skepticism, fearing that voluntary targets could eventually be converted into binding commitments. The report notes that the proposal lacked detail on the allocation of emitting rights for new Annex B members and suggests the initiative may have been driven by internal Russian agency competition.

The document examines how trade policies influence climate change through scale, composition, technique, and direct effects, and analyzes the legal interactions between WTO law and the UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol. It also assesses the physical impacts of climate change on trade infrastructure and the competitiveness implications of implementing climate regulations.

The report analyzes the landscape of investor-state disputes in 2006, noting a shift toward non-ICSID arbitration venues and a lack of transparency in ad hoc proceedings. It examines specific cases involving land reform, intellectual property, and privatization, while highlighting legal contradictions in rulings against Argentina. The document also discusses the practice of 'treaty-shopping' and the ongoing debate over the distinction between legitimate government regulation and indirect expropriation.

The IAI report details the successful implementation of the CRN-II program and the closure of CRN-I, alongside new funding from the NSF for human dimensions research. It highlights expanded institutional cooperation with entities like RIOCC, CYTED, and IICA, and the organization of several workshops on climate-land use interfaces and disaster risk management. Administratively, the IAI appointed a new Financial and Administrative Officer and is transitioning its Data and Information System to open-source software. Financially, as of November 2006, only 6% of approved member contributions had been collected, though the institute expects to reach 90% for the 2006/2007 period.

The IAI Directorate report for May-November 2006 highlights the implementation of the CRN-II program, the closure of CRN-I, and the initiation of a new human dimensions program funded by the NSF. The period was marked by expanded regional cooperation with entities like RIOCC, CYTED, and IICA, as well as capacity-building efforts including a summer school in Germany and workshops on climate-land use interactions. Internally, the IAI appointed a new Financial and Administrative Officer and completed an independent audit. Financially, as of November 2006, only 6% of approved member nation contributions had been collected, though the Directorate estimated a final collection rate of 90% for the 2006/2007 period.