Search Climate Insights Directory

The paper examines the severe health and economic burdens of air pollution, noting that global premature deaths could double by 2050. It details the Impact Pathway Approach (IPA) for monetizing health damages and analyzes European industrial emissions data, identifying the power generating sector as the largest contributor to damage costs. The authors propose enhancing these assessments by integrating satellite-based Earth observation data from the MACC/Copernicus services to reduce model errors and provide higher resolution global and regional air quality analysis.

The Nkangala District Municipality Air Quality Management Plan assesses air quality across six local municipalities, identifying significant pollution from industrial point sources, domestic fuel burning, and mining. It details ambient air quality exceedances for PM10, SO2, and NOx, identifies specific 'hot spots' such as eMalahleni and Middelburg, and outlines a comprehensive implementation plan to improve government capacity and reduce emissions by 2020.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) has identified significant discrepancies in the National Air Quality Officer's (NAQO) decisions regarding Eskom's applications for postponement of minimum emission standards (MES). The CER highlights inconsistencies between the postponement periods and emission limits sought by Eskom and those actually granted, as well as a lack of clear commencement dates for certain standards. Specifically, the CER notes that for several power stations, the NAQO appears to have granted open-ended postponements for SO2 emissions 'until decommissioning' or implicitly granted 2020 MES postponements that were not explicitly requested. The document seeks formal clarification on these administrative inconsistencies to advise environmental justice organisations and impacted community groups.

The report links the expansion of the palm oil industry in Southeast Asia to the use of fire for land preparation, which frequently results in uncontrollable landscape fires. These fires, particularly those on drained peatlands, release hazardous particulate matter that causes an estimated 110,000 deaths annually in the region. The document highlights the exacerbating role of climate-driven droughts and the significant economic losses in tourism and industry, while calling for a global shift toward deforestation-free and peat-free palm oil production.

The U.S. EPA has issued a final rule updating air pollution performance standards for new residential wood heaters, including furnaces. This action follows a legal challenge by Earthjustice and other organizations regarding the EPA's failure to update the 1988 standards as mandated by the Clean Air Act. The new standards apply only to the manufacture of new units and aim to reduce the emission of particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and other hazardous pollutants to protect human health.

The document highlights that approximately 150 million people in the United States live in areas failing to meet federal air quality standards, with passenger and heavy-duty vehicles serving as major sources of pollutants like nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. It links these emissions to severe health outcomes, including respiratory ailments, heart disease, and up to 20,000 premature deaths annually from PM2.5. The text argues that while clean technologies and emission standards have significantly reduced pollution since 1970, current administrative rollbacks of policies like the Clean Air Act threaten these public health gains.

The document analyzes natural gas flaring in the Bakken formation of North Dakota, noting that in 2013, 32% of all produced gas was flared. It disputes the claim that slow federal permitting for pipelines is the primary driver of flaring, providing data that 72% of 2013 flaring occurred on private or state-owned land and 57% of statewide flaring came from wells already connected to gathering pipelines. The author argues that flaring is instead caused by insufficient infrastructure capacity, lack of front-end planning, and investment gaps, and opposes HR 4293, which would allow the Secretary of Interior to bypass the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process for pipeline and compressor station permits on federal lands.

The report analyzes three scenarios for Estonia's transport sector: 'Non-intervening' (BAU), 'Low-intervention' (VS), and 'Knowledge-based' (EE). The BAU scenario predicts a nearly 60% increase in energy consumption by 2030 compared to 2012 levels. The EE scenario, which employs systemic policies including road user charges and land-use planning, aims to stop energy consumption growth, potentially achieving a 2% reduction by 2030. The analysis highlights that private and corporate spending on vehicle imports, maintenance, and fuel (approximately 1.5-1.7 billion EUR annually) far exceeds public infrastructure and passenger transport spending (approximately 400 million EUR annually). Environmentally, the EE scenario is the only one to project a decrease in CO2 equivalent emissions, forecasting a 36% reduction by 2030 compared to 2012.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) objects to Eskom's request to increase particulate matter (PM) emission limits at the Duvha Power Station. CER argues that Eskom's application is based on flawed modelling, fails to account for severe health impacts, and contradicts the goals of the Highveld Priority Area. The document highlights Eskom's history of environmental non-compliance and poor planning, asserting that the requested 'grace period' for repairs is an opportunistic attempt to avoid meeting Minimum Emission Standards (MES).

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) argues that Eskom's requests to postpone compliance with the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (AQA) should be denied due to flawed atmospheric modelling, exaggerated compliance costs, and significant risks to human health. The CER contends that Eskom fails to meet the legal requirements for postponement, particularly regarding the impact on declared Priority Areas. Furthermore, the document critiques Eskom's proposal for emission offsets as lacking a legal basis and sufficient data, while highlighting that granting these postponements would lead to substantial increases in SO2, NOx, and PM10 emissions through 2020.

The document examines the debate over the EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and its application to Texas. It refutes arguments from Texas officials and energy companies regarding grid reliability, compliance timelines, and the validity of emission data. The brief highlights that many Texas coal plants already possess the necessary control technology and that the rule's implementation would provide significant public health benefits for both downwind states and Texas communities.

The research paper evaluates strategies to decarbonise urban transportation, focusing on modal shifts, fuel switching, and electricity decarbonisation. Using a Spanish urban area as a model, it finds that aggressive measures—including a 50% reduction in car demand, improved fuel economy, and a shift to nuclear or CCS-equipped power—are necessary to significantly lower emissions and health burdens from particulate matter.

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) is challenging Eskom's application to postpone or be exempt from minimum emission standards (MES) for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter across 17 power stations. CER argues that Eskom's current process lacks necessary health and environmental risk assessments and provides insufficient time for public consultation, which could make any resulting government decision subject to judicial review under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA).

The document argues that Eskom's applications for emission standard postponements and exemptions are legally invalid because ambient air quality standards (AAQS) are already exceeded in the affected priority areas. It highlights significant health risks, particularly from SO2 and mercury, and criticizes Eskom for failing to consider feasible alternatives such as renewable energy or decommissioning worst-performing plants. The submission also references a World Bank Inspection Panel report on the Medupi Power Plant, which found inadequate consideration of environmental principles, water scarcity risks, and cumulative health impacts.

Abigail Dillen of Earthjustice testifies that the 'Reducing Excessive Deadline Obligations Act of 2013' is a misguided attempt to derail lawsuits seeking to compel the EPA to regulate coal ash. The testimony highlights the severe environmental and health risks associated with the current lack of federal standards, including groundwater contamination by toxic metals, air pollution from fugitive dust, and the catastrophic potential for coal ash impoundment failures. Dillen emphasizes that the EPA has delayed necessary regulations for 13 years despite acknowledging their need, and that the proposed bill would leave the second largest toxic waste stream in the U.S. unregulated indefinitely.

The report examines the health and economic impacts of Alberta's heavy reliance on coal-fired electricity, which generated 64 per cent of the province's electricity in 2012. Using the Illness Cost of Air Pollution (ICAP) model and other data, the authors estimate that coal plants contribute to hundreds of premature deaths and thousands of emergency department visits annually. The report identifies a wide range of pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, mercury, and particulate matter, which affect respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological health. Economically, the report argues that the true societal cost of coal—including health damages and the social cost of carbon—ranges from 3.6 to 13.7 ¢/kWh, far exceeding the market pool price of 6.6 ¢/kWh. The authors conclude that the current system effectively subsidizes coal power at the expense of public health and recommend that Alberta accelerate the retirement of coal units beyond the 50-year limit allowed by federal regulations.

The document outlines the impact of the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) on global shipping emissions. It details operational strategies like speed reduction and virtual arrival systems, as well as technical solutions such as shore-based power, waste heat recovery, and air lubrication. Special attention is given to reducing black carbon and particulate matter (PM) through diesel particulate filters, slide valves, and water-in-fuel emulsification, particularly to mitigate the accelerated melting of ice in the Arctic region.

The report argues that carbon pricing is likely to improve air quality in California because the most feasible GHG abatement strategies—such as energy efficiency and fuel switching—also reduce local air pollutants. Using data from the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), the authors find a statistically significant negative relationship between carbon prices and emissions of both GHGs and local air pollutants (sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter). Notably, EU oil refineries showed stronger reductions in local air pollutants than the average industrial facility. While cogeneration is identified as the only strategy that could potentially increase local emissions, the report suggests that existing air quality regulations and new source reviews in California should prevent such outcomes. The authors recommend that California regulators use industrial audits to maximize synergies between GHG and LAP abatement and consider financial incentives for high-benefit projects in poor air quality areas.

The global atmosphere is at a critical stage, with climate change identified as the most pressing issue. While successful international cooperation has phased out ozone-depleting substances and lead in petrol, progress on particulate matter and tropospheric ozone is mixed, particularly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Despite the availability of low-carbon technologies, greenhouse gas concentrations continue to rise, leaving a gap of several billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent between current pledges and the targets needed to limit global warming to 2°C. The document advocates for an integrated approach to atmospheric protection and the use of short-lived climate forcers as a complementary strategy to CO2 reduction.

The report evaluates five brick-firing technologies: Fixed Chimney Bulls Trench Kiln (FCBTK), Zig-zag Kiln, Vertical Shaft Brick Kiln (VSBK), Down-Draught Kiln (DDK), and Tunnel Kiln. VSBK is identified as the most energy-efficient and lowest emitting technology, while DDK is the least efficient. Zig-zag kilns are proposed as the most logical replacement for the prevalent FCBTKs due to lower investment costs and better performance. The study highlights significant barriers to modernization in India, including labor shortages, rising fuel costs, and land lease restrictions. It recommends a roadmap including the phase-out of FCBTKs by 2020, promotion of internal fuels through semi-mechanization, and the launch of a national brick development programme to improve profitability and working conditions.