Search Climate Insights Directory

The report argues that Brazil's current energy-related emission trajectory is unsustainable and likely to exceed estimated fair carbon budgets between 2024 and 2035. It identifies significant opportunities for decarbonization in the transport, industry, and electricity generation sectors, suggesting that a transition to a low-carbon economy can be achieved with low or negative economic costs while improving public health and competitiveness.

Carbon Market Watch asserts that international carbon markets require high ambition and demand to function effectively. Drawing on the Kyoto Protocol experience where weak targets in Russia and Ukraine created 'hot air' credits that undermined emissions trading, the author advocates for eligibility criteria based on stringent targets and the principle of supplementarity, where market units only supplement domestic ambition.

The report utilizes the Climate Equity Reference Calculator to determine national 'fair shares' of global mitigation efforts based on the UNFCCC principles of responsibility and capacity. It argues that for wealthy, high-emitting countries, fair shares often exceed domestic mitigation potential, necessitating the provision of international support. Conversely, for poorer countries, domestic potential exceeds their fair share, requiring international support to unlock further reductions. The analysis uses three ambition pathways (Strong 2°C, Weak 2°C, and G8) and an 'equity band' (Low, Medium, and High settings) to assess national contributions, concluding that current pledges, such as the EU's 40% target, are generally inconsistent with 2°C goals unless supplemented by significant international support.

The CFAS Guide outlines the state of climate finance negotiations leading up to COP20 in Lima, focusing on long-term funding goals, the operationalization of the Green Climate Fund, and the roles of various financial mechanisms under the UNFCCC.

The document analyzes the 2014 U.S.-China climate agreement, detailing the specific emissions targets for both nations and their plans to transition away from coal toward renewables and natural gas. It discusses the diplomatic significance of the deal for the 2015 Paris negotiations and the specific pressures it places on Canada to increase its own climate ambitions and regulate its oil and gas sector.

The report examines the operationalisation of Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs), highlighting the necessity of country-led frameworks that integrate climate goals with socio-economic development. Using South Africa as a primary case study, it discusses the gap between international funding pledges and actual transition costs, the need for reduced capital costs, and the critical role of high-level political coordination and philanthropic support in building institutional capacity.

The document details community-led adaptation strategies across different ecological zones in Ghana. In the West Gonja District, women use Village Savings and Loans Associations (VSLAs) and energy-saving stoves to enhance organic shea processing and resilience. In the Savannah and northern regions, farmers employ climate-smart agriculture, including agroforestry and solar-powered irrigation, to improve soil fertility. In the peri-urban area of Aboabo, residents implement early warning systems and infrastructure modifications to mitigate flooding. Along the coast in Keta, communities use gabions, beach nourishment, and mangrove restoration to combat coastal erosion and sea-level rise.

The document details local adaptation efforts in Nigeria across three sectors: biogas production in Ogun state to reduce fuelwood reliance and protect forests; aquaculture improvements in Lagos state to secure livelihoods against climate impacts; and erosion control in Anambra state to prevent land degradation. While these actions align with Nigeria's NDCs and national policies, they are hindered by limited financial services, poor government support, and a lack of advanced technological know-how.

The document details community-based adaptation strategies in Senegal across three sectors. In Daga Birame, a 'climate-smart village' model utilizes climate forecasts, photovoltaic-powered boreholes, and assisted natural regeneration to increase agricultural yields. In the island communities of Dionewar, the 'Epis Maltais Savard' system of stakes and palm fronds has gained 2.6 metres of beach to combat coastal erosion. In Widou Thiengoly, adaptation focuses on heatwave resilience through early warning systems, Nubian vault construction for heat protection, and reforestation supported by the Great Green Wall Agency. All three initiatives align with Senegal's Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) but face common challenges including insufficient financing and limited technical capacity.

The document maps the decisions of the Katowice Climate Package, specifically focusing on the modalities, procedures, and guidelines (MPGs) for the enhanced transparency framework. It details the requirements for Biennial Transparency Reports (BTRs), the process for Technical Expert Reviews (TER), and the Facilitative Multilateral Consideration of Progress (FMCP). The guide also outlines accounting standards for NDCs, the role of the Global Stocktake, and support mechanisms for developing countries, such as the Capacity Building Initiative for Transparency (CBIT).

The document details the role of human activity in increasing atmospheric CO2 and the resulting global temperature rise, which reached 1oC above pre-industrial levels by 2017. It compares the projected impacts of 1.5oC and 2oC warming, noting that 2oC would expose over one third of the world's population to severe heatwaves and increase water stress by 50%. To limit warming to 1.5oC, the text argues for a 45% reduction in emissions from 2010 levels by 2030 and a transition to net zero by 2050. While the Paris Agreement establishes a framework for Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), the document states that current targets are insufficient and would likely lead to 3oC of warming by 2100.

The document highlights that just 1% of Algeria's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 819 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 181,286 GWh. While not expected to reach commercial scale by 2030, this technology could theoretically replace all fossil fuels used in Algeria's electricity production, eliminate coal imports, and support desalination and hydrogen production. The resource is noted for its low land footprint (12 km² per 1 GW) and its potential to leverage existing subsurface expertise from Algeria's oil and gas sector.

The document highlights that just 1% of Angola's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 197 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 62,933 GWh. It argues that this technology could replace fossil fuels in the electricity sector, reducing emissions by approximately 4 megatonnes of CO2eq, while utilizing significantly less land than solar, wind, or biomass. Additionally, the report suggests that Angola's existing oil and gas workforce and subsurface expertise could facilitate a transition to this zero-carbon energy source to address energy poverty and low electrification rates in rural areas.

The document highlights that just 1% of Argentina's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 2,659 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 348,032 GWh. This resource could theoretically replace all fossil fuels used for electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 47 megatonnes of CO2eq, which represents 129% of Argentina's Nationally Determined Contribution goal. Additionally, the technology offers high energy density, requiring only 12 km² of land per 1 GW, and could eliminate the need for the 17% of natural gas and 4% of electricity that Argentina currently imports.

The document highlights that just 1% of Armenia's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 40 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 7,876 GWh. This resource could theoretically replace all coal and gas used for electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 2 megatonnes of CO2eq, which represents 16% of Armenia's Nationally Determined Contribution goal for 2030. Additionally, the technology offers a low land footprint, requiring roughly 12 km² per 1 GW, and could eliminate Armenia's dependence on natural gas and electricity imports.

The document highlights that just 1% of Australia's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 624 GW of energy capacity, potentially meeting the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 436,281 GWh. It argues that this technology offers a low-land-footprint alternative to other renewables and a transition pathway for the oil and gas workforce.

The document highlights that just 1% of Azerbaijan's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 94 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 27,885 GWh. This resource could theoretically replace all fossil fuels used in Azerbaijan's electricity production, reducing emissions by approximately 13 megatonnes of CO2eq, which represents 41% of the nation's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) goal. The report emphasizes the technology's low land footprint—requiring roughly 12 km² per 1 GW—and its ability to leverage existing subsurface expertise from Azerbaijan's oil and gas sector.

The document highlights that just 1% of Bolivia's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 549 GW of energy capacity, far exceeding the country's 2021 electricity consumption of 10,829 GWh. It argues that this technology could replace coal and gas imports, leverage existing oil and gas subsurface expertise, and require significantly less land than other energy sources.

The document highlights that just 1% of Brazil's superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 341 GW of energy capacity, exceeding the country's projected 2050 electricity demand of 1,309,104 GWh. It argues that this technology could replace all coal and gas imports used for electricity, reduce electricity sector emissions by approximately 88 megatonnes of CO2eq, and leverage existing subsurface expertise from Brazil's oil and gas sector.

The document highlights that just 1% of Brunei's estimated superhot rock geothermal resource could provide 9 GW of energy capacity, generating over 71,162 GWh of electricity. This amount is approximately 12 times Brunei's 2021 electricity consumption of 5,698 GWh. Utilizing this resource could theoretically replace all coal and gas used for electricity production, reducing carbon emissions by about 5 megatonnes, which represents 77% of Brunei's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) goal of 5.9 megatonnes by 2030. Additionally, the technology is noted for its low land footprint, requiring roughly 12 km² per 1 GW, and its potential to leverage existing subsurface expertise from Brunei's oil and gas sector.