Search Climate Insights Directory

The document argues that Canada's economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic presents a unique opportunity to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy. It proposes seven 'green conditions' to guide government spending, including requiring companies to have net-zero plans, banning stock buybacks for aid recipients, and ensuring a just transition for workers. The report emphasizes that without deliberate conditions, recovery funds risk perpetuating unsustainable economic structures.

A joint letter from various environmental and climate organizations calling on global insurance associations to ensure COVID-19 stimulus packages support a low-carbon transition rather than fossil fuel industries, while urging the insurance sector to end coverage for coal and oil and gas expansion.

The document analyzes a new legislative report on MP 910/2019, which modifies Law 11.952/2009. The authors conclude that the report preserves several regressions, reverses previous improvements, and includes unconstitutional legislative additions, particularly regarding the extension of timeframes for land regularization and the simplification of verification processes for large areas.

The briefing outlines a strategy for the U.S. to 'build back better' after COVID-19 by investing in public transit, 'Complete Streets', electric vehicle infrastructure, and low-carbon concrete. It highlights a critical budget shortfall for transit agencies and a significant maintenance backlog, arguing that prioritizing repairs over expansion creates more jobs and reduces emissions.

The author contends that temporary economic slowdowns from the pandemic do not solve climate change and that abandoning climate policies to stimulate recovery is counterproductive. Instead, the text advocates for a low-carbon growth strategy, leveraging innovation and government incentives to transition the economy, particularly the oil and gas sector, while mitigating the increasing economic risks posed by climate-related disasters.

The author contends that the rapid global response to COVID-19 demonstrates the capacity for decisive action, which should now be applied to the climate crisis. The document advocates for aligning government stimulus spending with the Paris Agreement goals of limiting warming to 1.5C and reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. It suggests that screening stimulus investments through a climate lens can accelerate zero-carbon solutions in power, transport, and infrastructure, potentially creating a $26 trillion growth opportunity and 65 million new jobs by 2030.

The Global Resilience Partnership (GRP) has compiled a directory of resilience-focused initiatives, categorising them into funds and financing facilities, networks and alliances, organisations, and specific programmes and projects. The mapping covers a wide array of mechanisms, from large-scale funds like the Green Climate Fund to specialised regional initiatives such as the Africa Risk Capacity and the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility. These initiatives target various sectors including agriculture, urban infrastructure, water management, and financial risk disclosure, with a strong emphasis on supporting Least Developed Countries (LDCs), Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and vulnerable populations.

China faces a significant challenge where 66.5% of its coal-fired power plants are located in water-scarce areas, driven by the West-to-East Electricity Transmission Project. To mitigate this, China is investing heavily in solar and wind energy, implementing air-cooling technologies that save nearly 80% of water withdrawal, and enforcing stricter water resource management quotas and caps for the coal sector.

The document addresses the need for effective communication regarding the 'just transition' to ensure that the move to a low-carbon economy is not perceived as a threat to the livelihoods and identities of workers in energy-intensive industries. It warns that failing to engage in respectful dialogue with affected parties risks undermining the transition process. The guidance is based on a literature review, interviews with union leaders conducted by the New Economics Foundation, and Climate Outreach's expertise in climate communications.

The report highlights that achieving NDC targets in China could prevent between 225,000 and 368,000 premature deaths by 2050, with health co-benefits exceeding the cost of climate policy implementation. It notes that fossil fuel subsidies remain a significant challenge, costing USD 1.79 trillion in externalities and representing a substantial portion of the budgets otherwise allocated to health and environmental protection.

The Canadian Climate Institute advocates for moving beyond fragmented, siloed climate research toward an integrated approach. The author argues that narrow framing leads to incomplete solutions and that a systematic approach is essential to manage the transition to a low-carbon economy while ensuring affordability, health, and resilience for Canadians.

The report outlines the physical and economic risks Canada faces due to climate change, such as sea-level rise and the global shift away from carbon-intensive exports. It proposes a holistic approach to climate policy that integrates health, well-being, and economic competitiveness, moving beyond narrow emission targets. The document highlights existing Canadian subnational innovations in carbon pricing and coal phase-out while recommending that governments expand the scope and ambition of their climate actions to ensure long-term prosperity.

The report evaluates the DBSA and IDC using the Fair Finance Guide International (FFGI) methodology, finding that both institutions lack strong policy commitments to a low-carbon transition despite their developmental mandates. The DBSA showed strength in nature and power generation policies but failed on climate change targets, while the IDC ranked lowest among six assessed DFIs due to a critical lack of publicly available policies.

The document argues that Canada's COVID-19 recovery spending must be deliberately steered toward climate goals through specific conditions on bailouts and stimulus. It outlines seven 'green strings' to ensure a sustainable recovery: requiring zero-emission transition conditions for industry support, applying strict financial conditions like climate risk disclosure, prioritizing a worker-focused just transition, supporting low-carbon infrastructure, maintaining environmental regulations, ensuring spending transparency, and promoting social equity.

The document proposes seven 'green conditions' for Canada's COVID-19 economic recovery to align financial support with climate goals, including net-zero emissions by 2050, a just transition for workers, and strict financial regulations to prevent unsustainable investments.

The High Court of Ireland ruled on 19 September 2019 that the government's 2017 National Mitigation Plan was lawful, despite reports that Ireland would fail to meet its 2020 greenhouse gas emission targets. The court determined that the government maintains wide policy-making discretion and that the Plan, as an initial step toward a 2050 goal, did not breach constitutional rights to life or bodily integrity. While the court acknowledged the scientific consensus on the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate global warming, it concluded that intervening in the Plan's specific targets would violate the separation of powers.

The World Resources Institute condemns the U.S. decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, arguing that the move ignores scientific and economic evidence and undermines the U.S. competitive advantage in the low-carbon economy.

The report highlights that British Columbia provides hundreds of millions of dollars in fossil fuel subsidies, which contradicts its CleanBC policy and carbon pricing efforts. It specifically identifies the LNG sector and royalty credits as major areas of concern and recommends a comprehensive phase-out plan and increased data transparency.

The report identifies that British Columbia provides hundreds of millions of dollars in annual fossil fuel subsidies through tax exemptions, royalty reductions, and direct spending, which contradicts its CleanBC climate policy. It highlights a significant amount of foregone revenue, including billions in outstanding royalty credits and specific long-term supports for the liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector, and recommends a transparent self-review and phase-out plan.

The document explains that Law 13.887/2019 transformed the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) into a permanent instrument with an indeterminate registration deadline. However, it establishes a critical deadline of December 31, 2020, for registration to maintain the right to join the Environmental Regularization Program (PRA) and benefit from flexible rules for regularizing consolidated rural areas. Failure to register in the CAR prevents access to rural credit and environmental licensing, while failure to join the PRA exposes producers to stricter Forest Code rules, civil and criminal lawsuits, and market sanctions.