Search Climate Insights Directory

The report details the proceedings of the Regional Forum on Trade and Environment (July 1999), arguing that Central American countries must move beyond passive trade openness to a proactive regional strategy. It identifies the region's high biodiversity and renewable energy potential as competitive advantages that can be leveraged through organic agriculture, certified forestry, and environmental services. The document emphasizes the need for a unified position within the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) to prevent unilateral environmental restrictions and to promote sustainable development. Key recommendations include shifting from traditional agriculture to agroforestry, adopting organic production, and creating a regional certification system.

The document examines the emergence of markets for global environmental services in Central America, focusing on Costa Rica's leadership in carbon credit mechanisms and El Salvador's potential to leverage shade-grown coffee for biodiversity and carbon sequestration. It highlights the critical role of institutional frameworks in successfully transitioning to a 'service-based' environmental economy and discusses potential conflicts between these mechanisms and World Trade Organization (WTO) rules.

The document argues that the Kyoto Protocol lacks a clear system for managing Annex I Parties that exceed their assigned emission amounts at the end of a commitment period. It proposes a Compliance Fund where Parties can pay a fee—based on mitigation costs plus a multiplier—to receive emissions credits that 'make the climate whole' by funding reliable GHG mitigation projects. This is presented as a superior alternative to 'borrowing' from future periods, which the authors claim merely shifts the burden to future generations. For willful non-compliance, the report suggests 'Compliance Assessments' (monetary penalties) that could be enforced through a 'Compliance Assessment Recognition Agreement,' allowing these assessments to be treated as arbitral awards enforceable in domestic courts.

The report analyzes how South Africa's export-led growth strategy interacts with global environmental standards and regulations. It focuses on three sectors: coal, where the Kyoto Protocol threatens global demand; steel, where low environmental investment and cheap energy may be viewed as unfair subsidies; and citrus, which has successfully adapted to stringent EU and US market demands. The document argues that while formal WTO-legal green trade barriers are unlikely, informal pressures like eco-labeling and buyer specifications are increasing. It recommends better information gathering, stronger international representation, and government support for small exporters to meet international environmental standards.

The workshop focused on the complex relationship between trade liberalization and environmental protection, specifically for Pakistan. Participants discussed how WTO rules can constrain national policy and the risk of 'non-tariff barriers' used by developed nations. The proceedings highlight the need for national policy coherence, capacity building, and collective action among developing countries to ensure that trade supports rather than undermines sustainable development.

SGR argues that the UK government's approach to climate change is too cautious and fails to challenge the unsustainable nature of economic growth. The organization advocates for a 'Contraction and Convergence' model for global emissions, a shift in taxation from labour to resource use, and the complete replacement of fossil fuels and nuclear power with renewables. SGR specifically criticizes the government's reliance on 'accounting tricks' for non-CO2 gases, the lack of restrictions on air travel, and the potential dangers of climate engineering technologies.

The document argues that designing an effective compliance system is a top priority for Kyoto Protocol negotiations to ensure the downward trend of greenhouse gas emissions. It suggests that compliance institutions should be designed to identify implementation issues, allow for Party clarification, transparently assess questions, and automatically apply consequences to achieve the Protocol's emission reduction targets.

The document examines how Costa Rica and El Salvador can leverage global environmental service markets. Costa Rica is presented as a leader with a robust institutional framework for carbon trading and payments for environmental services. El Salvador is analyzed through the lens of its shade-grown coffee plantations, which provide critical biodiversity and carbon sink services despite the sector's economic decline.

The report examines how Costa Rica and El Salvador are positioning themselves to benefit from emerging markets for environmental services. Costa Rica is highlighted as a leader in carbon trading through the Kyoto Protocol's Joint Implementation and a robust national payment system for environmental services (PSA). El Salvador's case focuses on 'shade coffee' as a critical substitute for natural forests, providing essential water regulation, biodiversity habitats for migratory birds, and potential carbon sinks, though it faces severe land degradation and institutional weaknesses.

The proceedings of the Trade and Sustainable Development Workshop, held in July 1999 in Midrand, South Africa, detail discussions between government, business, and NGO representatives on the intersection of international trade and environmental protection. The workshop focused on preparing South Africa for the WTO Millennium Round in Seattle, examining the risks of 'green protectionism' and 'eco-imperialism' versus the opportunities of 'greening' trade. Key analyses included case studies on the South African coal, steel, and citrus sectors, as well as the potential of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and ISO 14001 certification. The participants identified significant research gaps in the impact of multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) and the need for a coordinated national mechanism to support trade negotiators with empirical evidence.

The report analyzes how Argentina's trade liberalization in the 1990s affected its environmental footprint. It finds that while the manufacturing export pattern remained dominated by high-pollution sectors, the agro-industrial sector experienced a 'virtuous' cycle where technological adoption, such as no-till farming and transgenic crops, improved soil health and reduced certain chemical residues. The document argues that Argentina's competitive advantage in sustainable agriculture could be leveraged in international negotiations, provided that national policies continue to support research and development in 'soft' technologies.

The document analyzes the impact of 1990s trade liberalization on Argentina's environment, finding a divergence between sectors. In manufacturing, liberalization did not shift the export pattern toward cleaner industries, though some firms improved management to reduce costs. In contrast, the agricultural sector in the Pampas region experienced a 'virtuous cycle' where growth and the adoption of technologies like direct sowing and GMOs led to environmental benefits, such as reduced soil erosion and carbon fixation, despite a lack of formal environmental policies.

The document assesses the role of the United States in the global effort to combat climate change following the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. It argues that the U.S. has failed to lead, contributing to 27% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions while resisting binding domestic action. The authors highlight critical loopholes in the Kyoto Protocol, such as the use of surplus emissions allowances from former socialist economies and ambiguous forest activity definitions. To ensure the treaty's success, the brief recommends that the U.S. implement mandatory domestic programs, defer demands for immediate binding commitments from developing countries, and support the Global Environment Facility.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) argues that Joint Implementation (JI) should not move from its pilot phase to full crediting without an independent evaluation and a comprehensive legal framework. While acknowledging JI's potential to lower abatement costs and foster technology transfer, the paper highlights significant risks, including the potential for 'neo-colonialism', the displacement of food production by forestry projects, and technical difficulties in measuring 'additionality' and 'leakage'. CIEL proposes twelve principles, emphasizing that Annex I countries must meet the majority of their emissions targets through domestic reductions rather than offsets, and that JI projects must provide guaranteed environmental and socio-economic co-benefits beyond carbon sequestration.

The World Scientists' Call for Action, signed by 1,586 scientists including 110 Nobel laureates, demands that the 1997 Kyoto Climate Summit result in a strong treaty with legally binding emission reductions for industrial nations. The signatories warn that human-induced global warming threatens sea levels, human health, and food security, while exacerbating existing environmental crises such as deforestation and species loss. They emphasize that the developing world is particularly vulnerable and call for a transition to renewable energy and a new commitment to global environmental stewardship.

The authors contend that while international UNFCCC negotiations move slowly, rapid progress in domestic climate legislation—particularly in emerging economies—is shifting the center of gravity of the climate debate. They argue that national actions driven by self-interest and co-benefits, such as energy security and resource efficiency, are prerequisites for an effective international treaty.

The LDCs group expressed mixed reactions to CoP17, welcoming the operationalisation of the Adaptation Committee, the start of national adaptation plans, and the governing instrument of the Green Climate Fund. While the group supported the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, it noted that Durban failed to resolve central mitigation issues, leaving global temperatures on a path to rise by 3 to 4 °C. The LDCs call for developed countries to provide Quantified Emission Limitation and Reduction Commitments (QELRC) and for urgent clarity on the predictability and additionality of climate finance.

The document examines how 'suppressed demand'—the unmet desire for products or services due to barriers like low income, poor infrastructure, and high technology costs—disadvantages low-income countries in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Current CDM methodologies typically use 'actual consumption' as a baseline, which results in lower certified emission reductions (CERs) and makes projects less attractive to investors. The brief advocates for using 'desired consumption' as the baseline to reward avoided pollution and promote sustainable development. It highlights the outcomes of CMP7, which requested the CDM Executive Board to accelerate the implementation of guidelines on suppressed demand, particularly for LDCs, Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and African countries, while calling for increased capacity building and skills enhancement in these regions.

The document examines how 'suppressed demand'—the unmet desire for products or services due to barriers like low income, poor infrastructure, and high technology costs—leads to the underestimation of emission baselines in LDCs and African countries. It argues that because the CDM currently relies on actual (constrained) consumption rather than desired consumption, these regions are marginalized in the carbon market. The author advocates for the operationalization of guidelines adopted by the CDM Executive Board and the Conference of the Parties serving as a meeting of Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP) to incorporate suppressed demand into baselines, which would increase the number of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) and encourage investment in sustainable development projects in poor regions.

The report analyzes the legal distinctions between a protocol, another legal instrument, and an agreed outcome with legal force within the context of the UNFCCC. It distinguishes between 'legal force' (being part of international law) and 'legally binding' (having definite procedures and sanctions for non-compliance). The author argues that the legal character of the final agreement depends more on the prescriptive nature of its content and its enforcement mechanisms than on its formal legal designation.