Search Climate Insights Directory

The Green Economy Coalition (GEC) met in February 2013 to establish its 2013-2015 strategy. The coalition aims to counter 'green growth' narratives that ignore equity and ecological limits by engaging with the G20, World Economic Forum, and national governments. Its work plan consists of three core activities—dialogue, knowledge sharing, and collective influence—and five thematic projects: Measuring What Matters, Financial Sector Reform, Greening Economic Sectors, Investing in People, and Managing Natural Systems. The GEC intends to transition into a network of collaborating partners, expanding its membership to include more developing countries and private sector entities.

The document argues that the global energy system is unsustainable and unjust, driven by neoliberalism and extractivism. It details the environmental and social harms of fossil fuels, nuclear power, and certain 'clean' alternatives, while warning against 'techno-fixes' and corporate-led transitions. It advocates for a decentralized, democratically controlled system that prioritizes basic human rights to energy and a just transition for workers.

The document addresses the tension between the pursuit of a green economy and the existing international trade system. It argues that while Rio+20 provided general guidance, it failed to establish what constitutes 'appropriate state behaviour' regarding green industrial policies, such as subsidies and local content requirements. The author highlights a rise in trade frictions—including disputes between the U.S., China, and the EU over solar and wind technology—and asserts that the WTO's Dispute Settlement Mechanism is ill-suited to resolve these issues because they stem from a lack of international consensus on policy propriety rather than simple rule breaches. The text advocates for the creation of an institutional space, such as through UNCTAD, to evaluate the effectiveness of green tools and their impacts on trading partners, particularly developing nations, to ensure a just transition.

The Green Economy Pocketbook advocates for a systemic shift toward a green economy to combat economic instability and environmental decline. It proposes redefining progress through wellbeing indicators, redirecting financial flows via green public procurement and the removal of subsidies, and investing in high-impact sectors like renewable energy and sustainable agriculture. The guide emphasizes a just transition through education and skills training to reduce poverty and inequality, while warning that current resource-intensive growth is unsustainable. It also highlights the growth of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) and proposes nine guiding principles for a fair and inclusive green economy.

Minister Molewa's 2012 Budget Vote Speech details South Africa's commitment to a 'just transition' to a low-carbon, green economy. Key initiatives include the implementation of the National Climate Change Response Policy, the rollout of a 800 million Rand Green Fund, and the creation of biodiversity jobs through SANBI. The speech also addresses the National Waste Management Strategy, the fight against rhino poaching through SADC collaboration and CITES engagement, and the streamlining of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) to balance economic growth with sustainability.

The German Greens propose a Green New Deal to transition Germany toward a low-carbon, resource-efficient economy. The plan rests on three pillars: re-regulating financial markets to end speculation, implementing green industrial policies to promote renewables and efficiency, and ensuring social justice through a 'new social balance' and fair wealth distribution. The authors argue that Germany's industrial success depends on this transformation and that it must be coordinated at the EU level to be effective.

The report recommends that nations adopt strategic principles to accelerate the global energy transition. These include implementing policies for energy efficiency and renewable energy scale-up, creating a transparent global investment fund for poor and emerging economies, developing policy assessment frameworks based on planetary boundaries to manage Earth systems risks, and using sustainable energy measures as a metric for development and environmental progress.

The report documents a 2010 conference of the South African Civil Society Energy Caucus, focusing on the lack of transparency and public participation in the development of the second Integrated Resource Plan (IRP2). It critiques the government's continued reliance on coal and nuclear power, highlighting the failures of the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) and the environmental risks of radioactive waste in the Witwatersrand goldfields. The document advocates for a 'just transition' toward renewable energy, specifically wind and solar, while calling for an independent system operator to resolve conflicts of interest within Eskom.

The report critiques carbon trading as a high-risk distraction that allows developed nations to avoid domestic emissions reductions and undermines the principle of common but differentiated responsibility. It proposes a comprehensive package of alternatives, including a global feed-in tariff for renewable energy, a transition to small-scale sustainable agriculture, and the implementation of common industrial standards for best available technology. To fund these transitions and support developing countries, the report suggests generating at least US$420 billion per year through a global financial transaction tax, cracking down on tax evasion, redirecting fossil-fuel producer subsidies, issuing new Special Drawing Rights, and implementing carbon and energy taxes.

The document critiques carbon trading as a 'dangerous obsession' that allows developed nations to avoid domestic emission reductions and fails to provide predictable financing for developing countries. It proposes a transition to a low-carbon economy through a 'Just Transition' framework, emphasizing the historical responsibility of rich nations. Key mitigation alternatives include a global feed-in tariff program for renewables, sustainable small-scale agriculture, and the adoption of 'Best Available Techniques' in industry. For financing, the report suggests a combination of a global financial transaction tax, combating tax evasion, redirecting fossil fuel subsidies, and issuing new Special Drawing Rights, estimating a potential for US$420 billion in annual new climate finance.

The document argues that South Africa must transition from a coal-dependent energy system to a low-carbon economy to ensure energy security and maintain competitive advantage. It highlights the need for institutional and regulatory reform to allow clean electricity suppliers to enter a market currently dominated by coal and the national utility. The text notes that current energy and climate policies are undermined by a lack of coherence across government departments. Additionally, it identifies a significant funding gap for local infrastructure, noting that South African municipalities receive less than 10% of the country's climate finance.

The IPEN Dubai Declaration outlines a comprehensive strategy to eliminate persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other toxic chemicals by 2020. It calls for the adoption of the precautionary principle, the 'no data, no market' rule, and the 'polluter pays' principle. The declaration emphasizes protecting vulnerable populations, including children and indigenous communities, and advocates for a just transition for workers. It further urges the expansion of international agreements like the Stockholm and Rotterdam Conventions and the establishment of a dedicated chemical safety focal area within the Global Environment Facility (GEF).

The author contends that EU climate policies, including CBAM, EUDR, and maritime regulations, are unilaterally imposed and threaten African economic development. The text highlights risks such as an $11 billion annual loss for exporters under EUDR and a potential 0.91% reduction in Africa's GDP due to CBAM. It further criticizes the EU-ETS and FuelEU Maritime for increasing freight costs for African consumers and extracting USD 3–5 billion annually without reinvesting in African sustainability. The document recommends that the EU redirect revenues from CBAM and the Innovation Fund to support Africa's green transition and align maritime measures with the IMO's Net-Zero Framework.

The document identifies a significant investment gap in Africa's energy transition, estimated at US$35 billion per annum, and outlines the structural, political, and economic barriers hindering private investment. It proposes that DFIs take a catalytic role by improving institutional environments, developing bankable project pipelines, and employing innovative financial instruments—such as blended finance, green bonds, and local currency lending—to mitigate risks and crowd in private capital.

The document examines the tension between Africa's fossil fuel endowments and the global push for decarbonization, highlighting the risks of stranded assets and the dominance of Global North financing. It argues for a Just Transition that ensures energy access while moving toward low-carbon sources.

The document outlines a comprehensive framework for implementing climate citizens' assemblies, emphasizing deliberative democracy to generate public policy recommendations. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while providing specific guidance on independent governance, inclusive participant selection, and the use of digital facilitation tools. The guide is based on experiences from state-level and regional assemblies in Spain, including those in Barcelona, Mallorca, and Guipúzcoa.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing deliberative democracy for climate policy, detailing a five-phase process: preparation, learning, reflection, recommendation drafting, and decision-making. It emphasizes the need for independent governance, representative sampling, and inclusive accessibility measures to ensure high-quality, legitimate public policy recommendations.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to deliberative democracy applied to the climate crisis. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—supported by independent governance structures. The guide emphasizes inclusivity, accessibility, and the use of both digital and physical tools to ensure a representative sample of citizens can produce legitimate policy recommendations for governments and social actors.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing climate citizens' assemblies as tools for deliberative democracy. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while emphasizing the need for independent governance, representative sampling, and inclusive accessibility. The guide provides specific technical tools for virtual and in-person facilitation and uses examples from assemblies in Spain, Barcelona, Mallorca, and Gipuzkoa to illustrate different scales of implementation.

The document outlines a comprehensive approach to implementing climate citizens' assemblies, emphasizing deliberative democracy to generate public policy recommendations. It details a five-phase process—preparation, learning, reflection/deliberation, recommendation drafting, and decision-making—while highlighting the importance of independent governance, inclusive participant selection, and the use of specific facilitation techniques to ensure balanced participation. The guide also provides practical tools for managing virtual and physical sessions, ensuring accessibility for diverse populations, and maintaining the anonymity of participants to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.