Search Climate Insights Directory

The report finds that while PRSPs acknowledge vulnerability, they often treat it as a static dimension of poverty rather than a dynamic process. There is a significant gap between the acknowledgement of vulnerability and the implementation of specific, targeted reduction measures, with a tendency to overemphasize exposure over sensitivity and resilience.

The IAI Executive Directorate report for 2006-2007 details the institute's efforts to integrate climate science with policy, specifically focusing on land-use change in the Plata Basin and urbanisation in Latin America. It highlights the transition from the CRN I to CRN II research networks, the success of the Training Institute Seed Grants (TISG) in fostering multidisciplinary networks across 19 countries, and new strategic partnerships with organizations like IDRC, SCOPE, and the MacArthur Foundation to address biodiversity in the Andes.

The workshop brought together practitioners and policymakers to discuss early lessons from adaptation projects in south-eastern Africa. Key discussions focused on coping with extreme events, health impacts, and energy vulnerabilities, while exploring the distinction between development and adaptation projects. The event highlighted the need for participatory, community-led approaches and better access to climate data and international funding.

The report details a workshop where 40 participants discussed a variety of climate adaptation tools, ranging from information databases to computer-based decision tools and qualitative risk management processes. It identifies a general trend of integrating climate impacts as additional stressors into existing decision-making structures and highlights a gap in tools targeting the middle ground between grassroots communities and senior officials. The document also lists specific tools such as PRECIS, CRiSTAL, and ADAPT, comparing their audiences, spatial scales, and data types.

The report identifies that while formal hazard management in Honduras improved after Hurricane Mitch, significant vulnerabilities remain due to systemic issues. Key drivers of vulnerability include widespread deforestation, an inaccessible credit system for small farmers, and a national focus on short-term preparedness over long-term mitigation. The study highlights a disconnect between national-level planning and local awareness, where less than 20% of interviewed community members knew the roles of hazard management agencies. While social networks and migration serve as critical short-term coping mechanisms, they do not address the root causes of vulnerability, such as inequitable land tenure and a culture of corruption and mistrust.

The IAI report details the successful implementation of the CRN-II program and the closure of CRN-I, alongside new funding from the NSF for human dimensions research. It highlights expanded institutional cooperation with entities like RIOCC, CYTED, and IICA, and the organization of several workshops on climate-land use interfaces and disaster risk management. Administratively, the IAI appointed a new Financial and Administrative Officer and is transitioning its Data and Information System to open-source software. Financially, as of November 2006, only 6% of approved member contributions had been collected, though the institute expects to reach 90% for the 2006/2007 period.

The IAI's 2006/07 program focuses on transitioning from a period of scientific excellence to one of policy relevance and regional integration. Key initiatives include the implementation of the second Collaborative Research Network (CRN II), the synthesis of CRN I, and the development of a Program on Climate Variability in the Americas with CPTEC. The IAI aims to strengthen capacity building through seed grants, training institutes on disaster risk and climate impacts, and strategic partnerships with organizations like the UN ISDR and IICA. Administrative efforts are centered on optimizing internal processes through new manuals and an electronic proposal and report system.

The IAI's 2006/07 annual plan focuses on transitioning from a purely scientific excellence program to one that integrates policy relevance and adaptation to global change. Key initiatives include the launch of the Cooperative Research Networks II (CRN II), the conclusion of CRN I, and the implementation of six strategic goals approved in 2002. The plan emphasizes administrative rationalization, the expansion of the Data Information System (DIS), and increased cooperation with Argentina, Brazil, and Canada. Capacity building will be driven by 'seed grants' and multidisciplinary training institutes focused on the science-policy interface, including collaborations with organizations like the UN's ISDR and the IICA.

The paper argues that resource rights—whether private or communal—are critical determinants of disaster vulnerability and recovery. In the pre-disaster phase, secure rights encourage investment in resilience and sustainable resource management, such as protecting mangrove buffers. Post-disaster, the loss of documentation and titleholders often delays reconstruction and compensation, potentially leading to opportunistic land grabs or social conflict. The authors emphasize that equitable re-allocation of resource rights is essential for restoring sustainable livelihoods and reducing long-term vulnerability.

The CRN program, initiated in 1999 with an initial investment of US$10 million, established 14 international research networks to investigate global environmental change in the Americas. The program successfully leveraged over US$20 million in supplemental funding by June 2004 and supported 429 students. Key scientific outputs include research on soil degradation in Brazil and Argentina, dendrochronological reconstructions of climate variability, the drivers of deforestation in the Amazon, and the impacts of UV-B radiation and ENSO on ecosystems and human health. The program emphasized capacity building through the training of graduate students and the creation of regional data portals and research stations.

The IAI CRN program has established a broad network of scientists and institutions across the Americas and globally, leveraging over US$ 20.7 million in additional funds. The initiative has supported 429 students and produced a significant volume of refereed publications between 1999 and 2003. Specific project summaries highlight research on climate variability in Mesoamerica, water quality in the Andean Amazon, ENSO risk management, biodiversity in grasslands and forests, and the impacts of cattle ranching on deforestation in Brazil, Peru, and Ecuador.

The report details the first ten years of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI), outlining its mission to understand global environmental changes in the Americas. It describes the evolution of its scientific agenda from seven initial themes to four broad categories, the implementation of various grant programs (Initial Grants, Initial Scientific Program, and Cooperative Research Networks), and the establishment of its headquarters in Brazil. Key achievements include the funding of 14 Cooperative Research Networks (CRNs) with a US$10 million investment, the training of hundreds of scientists and students, and the creation of the IAI-DIS data system. The document also lists specific research projects focusing on climate variability, biodiversity, and human dimensions across North, Central, and South America.

The report details Phase One (2001-2003) of a collaborative initiative to integrate disaster risk reduction, environmental management, and poverty reduction into climate adaptation. It argues that protecting natural services and enhancing sustainable livelihoods (SL) reduce the vulnerability of the poor to climate-related hazards. Through case studies and desk assessments in regions such as Sudan, Bolivia, and Vietnam, the project demonstrated that ecosystem management and restoration (EM&R) activities—such as watershed rehabilitation and mangrove reforestation—increase community resilience. The report provides lessons for field implementation and policy integration, specifically suggesting entry points for these micro-scale activities within UNFCCC processes like National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs) and the UNDP Adaptation Policy Framework (APF).

Tropical hillside communities in Latin America, Africa, and Asia are highly vulnerable to soil erosion and deforestation, which are exacerbated by climate change. The PASOLAC program in Nicaragua, Honduras, and El Salvador demonstrates that Sustainable Soil and Water Management (SSWM) techniques—such as agroforestry, organic fertilization, and the construction of dams—increase resilience to droughts and heavy rainfall. Key outcomes include improved soil water retention, reduced topsoil loss, and the restoration of year-round water flows. The document argues that integrating human-based approaches, financial instruments like payments for environmental services, and market access is essential for long-term adaptation and livelihood security.

The briefing argues that climate change adaptation must begin by addressing current vulnerabilities, particularly for the poor who rely heavily on ecosystem services. It advocates for a 'sustainable livelihoods approach' that combines disaster risk reduction, environmental management, and poverty reduction. By implementing activities such as watershed restoration and mangrove reforestation, communities can secure their natural resource base, diversify income, and increase resilience to both immediate disasters and long-term climate impacts.

The report examines how environmental stress, resource scarcity, and inequitable access to natural resources contribute to political instability and violent conflict across various global contexts. Through case studies in Pakistan, Indonesia, Nicaragua, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, and the North Atlantic, it demonstrates that environmental mismanagement often amplifies existing social and political tensions. The authors argue that investing in sustainable resource management and equitable livelihoods can offset the need for peacekeeping and humanitarian relief by addressing the root causes of insecurity. The document also explores the impact of armed conflict on biodiversity and provides strategic recommendations for conservationists to operate effectively before, during, and after periods of violence.

The report evaluates the initial year of the CRN program, highlighting a strong scientific output and significant capacity building through graduate courses and workshops across the Americas. While many projects successfully leveraged millions in additional funding, the IAI identified critical administrative gaps, specifically the lack of a standard reporting format and difficulties in international fund transfers.

The 'Growing up in adversity' project, conducted by Universidad del Norte in Manatí, Colombia, examined the gender-specific psychological and social effects of devastating floods that occurred between 2010 and 2011. The study found that women faced unique vulnerabilities due to gender-related patterns of resource access and domestic responsibilities, but also demonstrated significant adaptive social skills in temporary housing. By employing clinical psychology interventions, community workshops, and an SMS alert system, the project helped survivors strengthen social support networks and consolidate a group identity. The findings argue for the necessity of sex-disaggregated data and a gender-based approach to disaster preparedness plans to move beyond viewing women as victims and instead leverage their active contributions to community resilience.

The briefing by ODI and CDKN argues that while the Zero Draft of the Post-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction shows some progress in inclusion and environmental considerations, it fails to provide a coherent structure or a strong narrative linking disaster risk reduction (DRR) to climate change, poverty, and sustainable development. The authors highlight critical gaps in financial commitments, the treatment of conflict-affected states, and the lack of detailed implementation plans for science and technology.

The document discusses the tension between aesthetic and functional choices in urban greening across Indian cities, noting that many commonly planted exotic species are prone to uprooting during extreme weather events like cyclones. It highlights a lack of scientific rigour in national guidelines and fragmented institutional management of urban greenery, while weighing the biodiversity benefits of native species against the perceived hardiness of non-native species in urban environments.