Search Climate Insights Directory

The CEO of Mighty Earth critiques the continued sale of internal combustion engines and the scaling back of EV investments by US automakers, contrasting this with China's aggressive expansion in EV production, supply chain decarbonization, and market share.

A pilot project in Berbere, Ethiopia, replaced costly and unreliable petrol-powered irrigation with solar pumps, enabling farmers to shift from subsistence staple crops to high-value produce and significantly increasing their seasonal earnings.

ASEAN requires an estimated US$281 billion annually by 2035 for its energy transition, necessitating a strategic blend of bilateral financing from China, Japan, and the US. While China provides scale and speed through asset-led infrastructure, Japan focuses on system-level upgrades and concessionality, and the US employs blended finance to mobilise private capital. The report argues that ASEAN countries are transitioning from being mere deployment markets to becoming manufacturing hubs for EVs, solar PV, and critical minerals. It recommends that the 2026 ASEAN Summit be used to align these national industrial strategies into coordinated regional value chains to avoid duplication and attract diverse global capital.

The report argues that the United States can meet surging electricity demand from AI data centers using clean energy while phasing out fossil fuels, provided that stronger state and federal policies are implemented. It warns that under current policies, data center growth will increase reliance on gas and coal, leading to higher emissions and significant costs for ratepayers. Conversely, adopting clean energy policies—such as restoring federal tax credits and implementing carbon-free electricity standards—could save trillions of dollars in climate and health damages, far outweighing the costs of the energy transition.

The report evaluates the climate transition of 594 OECD pension funds using Net Zero Finance Tracker data. While target-setting is improving, significant exposure to expansionist fossil fuel companies remains. The analysis finds that funds with formal climate targets and transition plans hold higher shares of clean energy and that robust regulatory frameworks in countries like the UK, Denmark, and the Netherlands correlate with stronger climate action.

GreenLatinos condemns the Trump administration's repeal of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars, SUVs, and heavy-duty trucks, stating that the move targets clean energy and low-income minorities. The organization highlights that low-income households spend approximately 30% of after-tax income on transportation, and that Latino families are particularly vulnerable due to longer commutes and a higher proportion of income spent on fuel.

The Healthy Energy Homes Network Directory is a database of resources for Indigenous communities and supporting organizations. It lists Canada-wide initiatives and province- or territory-specific programs focused on affordable housing, energy efficiency retrofits, clean energy transitions, and health-related home improvements such as radon mitigation.

The document describes how hedging instruments stabilize debt service and reduce refinancing risk for clean energy, transport, and infrastructure projects. It identifies key providers, including commercial banks and multilateral development banks (MDBs), and details the legal and technical requirements for implementation across shallow, emerging, and mature markets. It specifically notes that hedging premiums in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) are high, typically ranging from 6% to 7% of the principal.

The report examines community benefits frameworks (CBFs) across six completed U.S. transmission projects, finding that early, meaningful engagement and tailored benefits—such as infrastructure upgrades, land conservation, and co-ownership—are essential for reducing opposition and avoiding costly delays. It highlights that while financial compensation is common, non-monetary benefits and innovative financing models, including Tribal co-ownership and nonprofit partnerships, provide more sustainable value. The analysis warns that delayed engagement or narrow benefit distribution can lead to litigation and community friction, emphasizing the need for regulatory flexibility and the use of trusted local messengers to build trust.

The document is a youth declaration from Indonesia calling for an energy transition that prioritizes human rights and ecological sustainability over corporate profit. It argues that the climate crisis is a result of power imbalances and economic greed, and demands that energy be treated as a right rather than a commodity. The declaration specifically rejects 'green' development projects that lead to the exploitation of community living spaces and natural resources, advocating instead for a transition driven by grassroots solidarity and local community energy initiatives.

The report assesses gender disparities across five African nations to inform the investment strategy of the $200m Novastar Ventures Africa People and Planet Fund III (NV III). It identifies pervasive gender-based violence, gaps in STEM education, and the disproportionate impact of climate change on women in agriculture and informal employment. To address these, NV III commits to the 2x Criteria, targeting specific gender quotas for employees, management, consumers, and suppliers within its portfolio companies, while implementing a Gender Lens Investment Policy.

The author contends that decarbonization is becoming the primary driver of global economic progress, citing the rapid adoption of renewables and electric vehicles in the EU, UK, and China. To remain competitive and diversify trade away from the US, Canada is urged to strengthen industrial carbon pricing, expand clean electricity grids, reduce oil and gas methane emissions, and maintain electric vehicle availability standards.

The paper argues that emerging clean energy technologies face a 'missing middle'—a gap where projects are too large for venture capital but too risky for institutional project finance. To address this, the authors introduce a 'systemic bankability' framework consisting of nine risk factors: construction cost overruns, technology performance, revenue adequacy, regulatory uncertainty, enabling infrastructure limitations, social opposition, supply chain limitations, commercial insurance unavailability, and delivery system limitations. The authors note that while solar and onshore wind eventually achieved systemic bankability, the process was too slow for current climate goals, and even established technologies can see their bankability erode due to new bottlenecks like grid interconnection delays and social opposition.

The We Mean Business Coalition states that current national climate plans, including those from China and the EU, fall short of the requirements for a 1.5 °C pathway and create investment uncertainty due to the use of ambition ranges rather than fixed commitments.

The EU has introduced Clean Trade and Investment Partnerships (CTIPs) to diversify supply chains and foster clean energy cooperation, starting with South Africa. To be effective, CTIPs must move beyond existing frameworks by providing predictable demand, mobilising private finance through innovative instruments, and ensuring transparent, coordinated governance to avoid being perceived as mere compliance tools.

The document outlines a communication toolkit for framing the transition to clean energy in the home as a collective societal effort rather than an individual burden. It emphasizes the use of solar power as a symbol of progress and provides tailored messaging for five specific UK audience segments: Progressive Activists, Incrementalist Lefts, Established Liberals, Rooted Patriots, and Traditional Conservatives. The guide advises against promising immediate financial savings and instead suggests highlighting existing progress, community benefits, and the protection of the British way of life.

The document advises communicators to frame net zero as a means to achieve a 'better future' with concrete benefits like cleaner air and good jobs, rather than defending it through statistics. It provides tailored messaging for five UK audience segments: Progressive Activists, Incrementalist Lefts, Established Liberals, Sceptical Scrollers, and Rooted Patriots, emphasizing local improvements, moral leadership, and the protection of British livelihoods and nature.

The report finds widespread public support for clean energy in the UK, with high levels of acceptance for wind turbines and solar panels across the political spectrum. It notes that in Scotland and Wales, renewable energy projects generate national pride comparable to or exceeding that of the fossil fuel industry. The analysis suggests that 'stories of progress' are more compelling to the public than narratives of failure or radical change. While support for renewables is high, the document emphasizes that fossil fuel industries remain tied to national identity and history, and that the transition must account for job losses and the perceived value of the industrial past.

The briefing outlines how regional financing ecosystems—comprising regional banks, community lenders, economic development organizations, and governments—can unlock capital for clean energy by structuring local projects into investable portfolios. It highlights that a one-size-fits-all approach is ineffective, citing specific high-feasibility opportunities in Minnesota (green steel and transmission) and New Orleans (green buildings and hydrogen). By coordinating diverse financial actors and using public or philanthropic funds to absorb first-loss risk, these ecosystems can address persistent barriers such as lack of predevelopment capital and underwriting friction to ensure inclusive economic benefits from the energy transition.

The document finds that while 74% of people in Britain consider climate change an important issue, their support for specific actions is heavily influenced by the language used. Framing climate action as 'protecting our environment' (59% support) is more effective than using technical terms like 'net zero' (43% support). There is a strong, unifying connection between climate change and nature, with 'harm to nature and wildlife' being the top concern for 41% of respondents. The report highlights that people across all socio-economic backgrounds are concerned, though many distance themselves from the topic due to immediate life pressures or the depressing nature of the subject. It recommends using tangible, local examples of progress and a holistic approach that links climate action with nature preservation to increase public engagement.