Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines the potential for wind energy in New England, emphasizing that the region has "excellent wind resources, particularly on mountain ridges and along the coast." It details the criteria for optimal siting—primarily wind speed, topography, and proximity to transmission lines—and highlights economic benefits such as tax revenues for towns and lease payments for landowners. The text addresses environmental concerns, noting that modern turbines cause significantly fewer bird fatalities than other human structures and that wind power does not reduce property values. It also discusses human impacts, including visual aesthetics, noise, and aviation lighting, while noting that 81 percent of surveyed Vermont residents find turbines "beautiful or acceptable."

The document outlines the environmental and economic benefits of wind energy in New England, noting that over 60 percent of the region's electricity was generated from fossil fuels in 2005. It explains how wind power integrates into the grid via ISO New England to displace more expensive and polluting plants, particularly oil-fired plants during winter peaks. The text highlights that 18 proposed wind projects with a total capacity of 1,890 MW could avoid millions of tons of pollution annually, including over 3 million tons of CO2. It also discusses the importance of siting for efficiency and the role of policy mechanisms like cap-and-trade and renewable portfolio standards in accelerating the transition.

The report finds that diesel construction equipment in California causes over 1,100 premature deaths and more than $9 billion in annual public health costs. It identifies excavators, tractors/loaders/backhoes, and crawler tractors as the highest polluters and highlights the South Coast air basin as the most affected region. The authors advocate for a regulatory regime to retire old equipment and install retrofit technologies to reduce particulate matter and nitrogen oxides.

The document advocates for substantial reductions in shipping emissions to protect public health and the environment, arguing that cost-effective technologies already exist. It proposes that NOx and SOx emissions be reduced by 70-90% for new and existing ships by 2015, with interim NOx reductions of 40-50% by 2010. The authors highlight a significant gap between strict land-based emission standards in the US and EU and the much higher limits currently set by the IMO, noting that shipping emissions in European waters are projected to exceed all land-based European emissions within a decade.

The report argues that China's pursuit of high GDP growth has led to severe environmental degradation, which in turn triggers internal security risks such as violent protests and mass migration. Internationally, China's need to secure energy, water, and timber resources drives an assertive foreign policy, leading to territorial disputes and the 'export' of environmental degradation to trading partners. The document highlights critical scarcity in water and energy, deteriorating air quality contributing to the 'Asian Brown Cloud', and the impact of domestic logging bans on international timber trade.

The document advocates for the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to strengthen MARPOL Annex VI by introducing rigorous limits on nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulphur oxides (SOx), and particulate matter (PM) for all ships. It provides evidence that current shipping emissions are under-regulated and cause significant public health and environmental damage, while asserting that advanced control technologies—such as selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and humid air motors (HAM)—make substantial reductions feasible and cost-effective. The submission highlights regional regulatory trends in the European Union and California as precursors to the need for a consistent global standard and urges the adoption of shore-side power standardization.

The report examines Sweden's 'Vision Zero' policy, which shifts road safety responsibility from the individual user to the system designers to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries. While UK focus groups found the concept laudable, a stakeholder survey revealed significant skepticism regarding its achievability and cost-effectiveness in the UK. The document provides a cost-benefit analysis suggesting high potential savings and proposes a 'backcasting' implementation schedule for the UK through 2030, integrating road engineering, speed control, and sustainable transport.

The report evaluates U.S. school bus emissions, finding that older diesel buses release significantly more soot than modern alternatives, posing health risks to children. It grades states on soot emissions, cleanup programs, and smog-forming pollution, noting wide performance gaps. The authors recommend a strategy of 'the five Rs'—retrofitting, refueling, replacement, repair, and reduced idling—and call for strengthened federal standards and increased funding to modernize fleets.

Diesel-powered transportation sources in the US are responsible for over 60 percent of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and more than 70 percent of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions. The World Health Organization classifies diesel exhaust as carcinogenic, with components like PM2.5 and NOx causing respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses, premature death, and reduced lung function. These health impacts disproportionately affect communities of color and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. While over 100 models of electric trucks and buses are currently available, the document argues that public policy is necessary to accelerate the market and address the climate crisis and health disparities.

This documentS document outlines regulatory standards for the minimization of fugitive dust across various activities, including material storage, construction, demolition, road maintenance, mining, and the management of tailings piles and ponds.

The report quantifies the health damages caused by diesel particulate matter (PM2.5) and other emissions across the U.S., highlighting significant risks of premature death, lung cancer, and respiratory illness. It estimates that 21,000 people die prematurely each year in the U.S. due to mobile diesel sources. The document proposes a three-phase retrofit strategy to reduce diesel PM by 85% by 2020, which could avoid approximately 91,000 premature deaths by 2030. It identifies urban areas and 'hotspots'—such as near bus depots and highways—as having significantly higher risks than rural areas. The report also details the effectiveness of retrofit technologies, such as diesel particulate filters (DPF) and closed crankcase filtration, particularly for improving air quality inside school buses.

Nigeria is identified as the world's largest gas flarer, wasting approximately 2.5 billion cubic feet of associated gas daily, which results in an annual economic loss of US $2.5 billion. The report asserts that flaring has been generally illegal since 1984 under the Associated Gas Reinjection Act, yet continues through a lack of transparency regarding ministerial certificates. Environmental impacts include the emission of roughly 70 million metric tons of CO2 annually and the creation of acid rain that corrodes infrastructure. Health risks for local communities, specifically in Bayelsa State, include increased rates of premature death, child respiratory illnesses, asthma, and cancer due to exposure to particulate matter and benzene. The report criticizes the 'double standards' of the British colonial legacy and the failure of projects like Bonny LNG and the West African Gas Pipeline to prioritize the use of associated gas over non-associated gas.

The document provides a comprehensive framework for using international human rights, labor, environmental, and health laws to safeguard children's health. It details specific treaties, such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Stockholm Convention, and explains the roles of global institutions like the WHO and UNEP. The guide outlines six primary functions of international law: providing blueprints for action, resolving disputes, promoting compliance, providing fora for discussion, building capacity, and promoting cooperation. It also includes case studies on housing rights in the Philippines and the Yacyretá Hydroelectric Project to demonstrate practical application of these legal tools.

The report estimates that diesel fine particle pollution causes approximately 21,000 premature deaths annually in the U.S., with significant risks of lung cancer, heart attacks, and asthma. It argues that while EPA regulations for new engines starting in 2007 are positive, the long lifespan of existing diesel vehicles (nearly 30 years) necessitates immediate retrofit actions. The document proposes a reduction target of 50% by 2010, 75% by 2015, and 85% by 2020, which could save nearly 100,000 lives by 2030. Recommended solutions include diesel particulate filters (DPF), Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD), and anti-idling ordinances.

The report details how Hispanic Americans are disproportionately exposed to air pollution, with 71 percent living in counties violating federal air quality standards as of 2002. It identifies specific health risks including asthma, stunted lung growth, and low birth weight, exacerbated by poverty and lack of health insurance. The document also notes risks from mercury contamination in fish and the potential for global warming to induce crop failures and famines. Finally, it argues that the EPA has failed to implement Executive Order 12898 because it has not identified impacted populations or developed criteria for determining disproportionate risk.

The document examines the environmental and social impacts of the aviation industry, noting that rapid growth in passenger and freight demand cancels out technological efficiency gains. It highlights the sector's contribution to climate change through greenhouse gases and radiative forcing, as well as local impacts like noise and air pollution. The authors propose a demand management strategy based on three pillars: internalising external costs via emission charges, shifting short-haul passengers to rail, and substituting physical travel with electronic communication. The paper concludes with nine specific policy recommendations, including a ban on night-time flights and the adoption of an 'environmental bubble' concept for airports.

In April 2004, air quality modelers from nine EPA regional offices protested a policy change allowing states to select their own baseline years for measuring pollution in 'Class I' areas. This policy emerged from a compromise with North Dakota, which had been out of compliance with the Clean Air Act regarding Theodore Roosevelt National Park, hindering plans for new coal-fired power plants. EPA scientists argued the change 'artificially inflate[s]' baselines to mask policy changes and feared it would set a national precedent, as other states like Colorado, Montana, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming sought to follow suit.

The Union of Concerned Scientists report 'A Blueprint for Saving Lives, Money, and Gasoline' analyzes the safety and environmental shortcomings of SUVs and light trucks in the United States. It highlights high rollover fatality rates, significant air pollution, and poor fuel economy compared to passenger cars. To demonstrate potential improvements, the authors propose two model vehicles—the UCS Guardian and the UCS Guardian XSE—which utilize existing technologies such as unibody construction, advanced engines, and electronic stability control to increase fuel efficiency and reduce fatalities without sacrificing vehicle size or performance.

The report applies a full cost accounting (FCA) approach to quantify the externalities of thermal power production in Eastern Canada, focusing on air pollution (SOx, NOx, VOC) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It finds that coal-fired power generates the highest externalities, with central estimates of $0.0394/kWh, which exceeds its marginal production cost of approximately $0.026/kWh. The study argues that internalizing these costs would shift investment toward natural gas, demand-side management, and renewable energy, and warns that Canada's Kyoto compliance strategy may forego domestic health co-benefits by favoring international emission credits over domestic reductions.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) has updated its Scientific Agenda to better reflect regional interests and the evolution of global change research. The agenda is organized into four broad themes: understanding climate variability in the Americas, conducting comparative studies of ecosystems and biodiversity, analyzing changes in the composition of the atmosphere and waters, and investigating the human dimensions and policy implications of global change. The IAI aims to promote cooperative research and information exchange to understand the integrated impact of past, present, and future global change on regional and continental environments in the Americas.