Search Climate Insights Directory

The document explores how residents of Metro Manila define being and becoming middle class, highlighting a diversity of markers including employment, consumption, and values. It examines the intersection of social mobility and migration, noting that Metro Manila serves as a hub for internal migrants and a transit point for international migration, with remittances and family support networks playing key roles in achieving middle-class status.

The report details survey results from the Ironbound Community (New Jersey), Navajo Nation Chapters (New Mexico, Arizona, Utah), and St. James and St. John the Baptist Parishes (Louisiana). It finds widespread skepticism toward developers due to unfulfilled past promises and low initial awareness of CBPs. While support for CBPs increased after residents were informed of potential benefits, priorities varied: environmental quality (water and air) and affordable housing were highly valued, while specific clean energy funding like EV charging stations ranked lower. Residents strongly emphasized the need for transparent, accessible engagement and the inclusion of small business owners and environmental groups in negotiations.

A survey of 58 European climate experts reveals skepticism about Europe's ability to meet its 2030 and 2050 climate goals, citing lagging investments and bureaucratic hurdles. While experts show varying confidence in technologies like CCS and hydrogen, there is a notable call for a more prominent role for nuclear energy and a shift toward 'technology optionality' and simplified, incentive-based policymaking.

The report uses the Six Americas Super Short Survey (SASSY) to categorize Facebook users in 110 countries and territories into six groups: Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive. The 'Alarmed' group is the largest in approximately 80 of the surveyed locations, with the highest percentages found in Chile (65%), Mexico (64%), Malawi (63%), Bolivia (62%), and Sri Lanka (61%). Conversely, the United States exhibits a higher proportion of 'Doubtful' and 'Dismissive' respondents (22%) compared to other major carbon emitters and is less 'Alarmed' (34%) than many of its peers. Regional analysis shows South America has the highest proportion of countries with a majority of 'Alarmed' respondents, while Southwest Asia and North Africa show higher levels of doubt or dismissal, particularly in Yemen (34%).

The Clean Air Task Force commissioned a national survey of residents in environmental justice communities—defined by race, ethnicity, and income—to assess their awareness of pollution impacts, interest in clean energy jobs, levels of civic engagement, and barriers to energy accessibility.

The document reports on a survey of 378 CDC scientists conducted by the Union of Concerned Scientists and the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. While a majority of respondents agreed that the agency adhered to its scientific integrity policy, the findings highlight concerns regarding the omission of politically contentious words from scientific work and the extent to which COVID-19 science consistently informed policy decisions. The report advocates for the passage of the Scientific Integrity Act and strengthened agency policies to protect science from political, ideological, and financial interests.

A survey of 296 EPA scientists conducted by the Union of Concerned Scientists and the University of New Hampshire Survey Center found that a majority of respondents believe the agency adheres to its scientific integrity policy and that office effectiveness has increased under President Biden compared to the Trump administration. However, the findings also highlight significant issues with staff burnout and concerns over limited workforce capacity and the quality of scientific reviews in specific offices.

A 2022 survey of FDA scientists by the Union of Concerned Scientists indicates a generally positive view of scientific integrity and a higher comfort level in expressing concerns without retaliation compared to previous administrations. While 198 of 239 respondents found agency actions consistent with scientific findings and 177 of 253 felt COVID-19 science informed policy, 50 of 236 scientists reported that senior leaders with conflicts of interest inappropriately influenced decisions.

A 2022 survey of 225 US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) scientists indicates a positive shift in scientific integrity and leadership support compared to previous administrations, though concerns remain regarding workforce diversity and high workloads.

The 2022 survey of NOAA scientists indicates a positive perception of scientific integrity and evidence-based decision-making under the Biden administration, with higher rates of training on scientific integrity policies compared to the Obama and Trump administrations. However, the findings highlight significant concerns regarding a lack of diversity in senior leadership and the scientific workforce, as well as widespread burnout caused by insufficient scientific capacity.

A survey of USDA scientists indicates a generally strong culture of scientific integrity, with 207 out of 238 respondents agreeing the agency adhered to its scientific integrity policy. While 160 out of 258 scientists felt they could express concerns without fear of retaliation, 147 out of 245 reported scientific workforce reductions over the previous two years. Political interference persists, with 38 out of 256 scientists reporting they were asked to omit politically contentious words from their work, though this is a decrease from 67 out of 291 during the Trump administration. Respondents noted that the Biden administration has reinforced commitments to science-based processes for addressing climate change, allowing the use of the term 'climate change' without fear.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) survey of federal scientists in 2022 indicates a general improvement in scientific integrity, morale, and job satisfaction under the Biden administration, particularly at the EPA, FWS, and USDA. While many scientists feel better protected from political interference, significant challenges persist, including critical staff capacity shortages leading to burnout, ongoing issues with censorship, and a lack of diversity in senior leadership at several agencies. The report also highlights the vulnerability of federal scientists to external harassment and bullying, especially those working on COVID-19 and climate change.

The report finds that while 92% of surveyed business leaders view reducing carbon emissions as an urgent priority, many struggle with the 'how' of decarbonization due to budget and technological constraints. Businesses increasingly view the voluntary carbon market (VCM) as a critical tool for immediate action, though concerns over greenwashing and market transparency persist. While science-based targets are widely supported, there is a significant demand for clearer, more realistic guidance to help organizations meet their 2030 and 2050 goals.

The report finds that while Indonesian banks show high compliance with national sustainability reporting mandates (POJK 51/2017) and are increasing their green portfolios, they lack the capacity and frameworks to implement detailed climate-related financial disclosures. Benchmarking against TCFD reveals significant gaps in governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics, with no surveyed bank fully aligned. Climate-related impacts are not yet integrated into formal financial statements or risk assessments like the ICAAP, though there is a growing trend toward adopting green taxonomies.

This briefing outlines the progress of the Regional Assessment conducted by the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI). The assessment aims to identify knowledge gaps and uncertainties in decisions impacted by global environmental change (GEC) to better target science and capacity-building efforts for Member Countries.

The 2022 outlook for the news industry emphasizes a period of consolidation following the COVID-19 crisis, with a strategic shift toward subscription models, digital audio, and AI-driven efficiency. While media leaders express confidence in their own companies, they remain concerned about societal polarisation and the financial viability of local news. The industry is pivoting toward youth-oriented platforms like TikTok and Instagram while struggling to effectively communicate the complexities of climate change to mainstream audiences.

The report highlights a disconnect between business-as-usual growth projections for animal agriculture and climate science, which predicts significant production losses and stranded assets. A survey of 201 investors reveals that while 82% view climate change as a material risk to meat and dairy investments, 55% believe investors are not sufficiently addressing these risks. The document emphasizes the critical need for methane reduction, noting that livestock is responsible for 32% of anthropogenic methane emissions, and calls for financial institutions to demand transparent reporting and support a transition toward alternative proteins.

The Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) surveyed 16 member countries to identify priorities and barriers regarding global environmental change. Climate action is the top current priority, while energy security and human health are key emergent priorities. Major barriers to using scientific data in decision-making include a lack of inter-sectoral collaboration and a shortage of non-technical information, while multilateral agreements and international funding are seen as primary opportunities.

Based on a representative survey of 811 Ukrainians in April 2022, the study finds that the vast majority of the population remained in their home provinces despite the invasion. Among those who did migrate, three quarters stayed within Ukraine, often moving toward safer western regions like Lviv. The analysis indicates that personal exposure to direct attacks significantly increases the likelihood of a person planning to leave their current location, while the targeting of friends or family does not have a significant effect.

The study reveals very low trust among Sámi respondents toward Swedish state authorities and hydropower companies regarding the protection of Sámi rights. This distrust is strongly correlated with high levels of concern over the negative impacts of hydropower on traditional land and water use, as well as perceptions of limited influence, insufficient institutional competence in Sámi rights, and poor communication. The authors argue that this trust deficit stems from a governance approach that treats the Sámi as mere stakeholders in dialogue rather than as rights-holders.