Search Climate Insights Directory

The report finds that while the 2022 consultation law has enabled some marginal influence, it often fails to provide meaningful impact on central issues. Major deficiencies include late involvement of Sámi representatives, inadequate timeframes, and a tendency for authorities to delegate responsibility to third-party applicants. The study highlights a significant 'educational burden' placed on Sámi parties to explain the law to officials and notes that many critical land-use matters remain exempt from the law's scope.

This case study by the Stockholm Environment Institute examines the risks posed by LKAB's proposed Per Geijer mining project to the Gabna sameby. The study introduces a new human rights impact assessment (HRIA) methodology specifically adapted for Sami reindeer husbandry to evaluate how industrial projects affect indigenous rights to land and culture.

The report introduces a rights-based risk assessment method for industrial projects on Sámi lands, arguing that current mining practices in Sweden lack a human rights perspective. Applying this method to LKAB's Per Geijer project, the authors find that the project poses a significant risk of violating Sámi rights, particularly the right to culture under ICCPR Article 27, by threatening the last remaining continuous grazing and migration corridor for the Gabna community. The study highlights a lack of transparency in EU 'strategic projects' and calls for proactive, landscape-based land use planning that guarantees real influence for Sámi rights holders.

The 'Wetlands in Sápmi' project emphasizes the critical importance of Arctic wetlands for forest Sámi reindeer herders, providing essential grazing, calving grounds, and climate respite. These ecosystems also serve as global carbon sinks, storing approximately 20% of the world's carbon. The document advocates for Participatory Topological Mapping (PTM) to capture the dynamic social-ecological relationships that conventional GIS mapping misses, thereby preventing the exploitation of areas erroneously assumed to be unused. It recommends that policymakers implement Indigenous engagement frameworks, data-driven protections for critical herding areas, and integrated land management plans to enhance climate resilience and preserve Sámi cultural heritage.

The authors welcome the Church of Sweden's forest inquiry for its ambition to integrate ecological, social, and spiritual considerations and its potential adoption of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for forestry affecting reindeer husbandry. However, they argue that the Church, as Sweden's fifth largest forest manager, must do more to align its land management in Sápmi with international indigenous rights frameworks to avoid sacrificing indigenous rights for short-term economic gain.

The document examines the negative impacts of hydropower on reindeer husbandry in Sápmi, including landscape fragmentation, safety risks, and the loss of traditional knowledge. It proposes specific mitigation measures—such as building reindeer bridges and using drones—and argues that Swedish authorities, particularly County Administrative Boards, have a legal obligation under the Minority Act and international law to ensure the effective participation and influence of Sami communities in the hydropower permit review process.

The study reveals very low trust among Sámi respondents toward Swedish state authorities and hydropower companies regarding the protection of Sámi rights. This distrust is strongly correlated with high levels of concern over the negative impacts of hydropower on traditional land and water use, as well as perceptions of limited influence, insufficient institutional competence in Sámi rights, and poor communication. The authors argue that this trust deficit stems from a governance approach that treats the Sámi as mere stakeholders in dialogue rather than as rights-holders.

The report examines the legal framework protecting Sami reindeer husbandry from hydropower exploitation in Sweden. It details the historical marginalisation of Sami rights, the current permit process under the Environmental Code, and the implications of new 2019 legislation requiring the review of existing hydropower plants for modern environmental conditions. The analysis highlights the challenges Sami villages face in being recognised as stakeholders and the financial burdens of legal proceedings during reviews.

The document is a formal petition by sixteen children from various countries against five states, alleging that their failure to mitigate climate change violates the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. It details specific harms faced by the petitioners—including extreme heat, wildfires, and sea-level rise—and argues that the respondents' current emission pathways are inconsistent with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement. The petitioners request that the Committee recognize climate change as a children's rights crisis and recommend that the respondent states accelerate mitigation efforts and prioritize the best interests of children.

The report argues that the proposed Laver mine would effectively make traditional Sami reindeer herding impossible in the area by destroying critical winter grazing lands. Through scenario analysis, the authors demonstrate that the mine would force herders into either unsustainable 'reindeer farming' via supplementary feeding or the total abandonment of the area, both of which threaten the intergenerational transfer of traditional knowledge and the survival of the Pite Sami language. The document also highlights a systemic failure in Swedish mining permit processes, which often ignore cumulative impacts and indigenous rights in favor of a presumed 'coexistence' between mining and herding.