Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines seven principles for the design and implementation of sustainable finance taxonomies to facilitate cross-border capital flows. Launched as part of the 'Roadmap for Advancing Interoperability and Comparability of Sustainable Finance Taxonomies' initiative, these principles aim to help policymakers and developers create frameworks based on shared scientific bases and common design elements, while remaining aligned with local priorities and international best practices.

The GCF Water Project Design Guidelines offer a framework for creating climate-resilient water projects, covering domains from water conservation to climate-resilient WASH. The guidelines include actionable insights for addressing climate risks, reducing emissions, and integrating sanitation with socioeconomic goals, alongside step-by-step proposal development guidance.

The guidelines establish a framework for GSS+ labelled financial instruments in Panama, aligning with international standards like ICMA and the Climate Bonds Standard. It details the requirements for use-of-proceeds instruments (green, social, sustainability) and general-purpose sustainability-linked instruments, emphasizing transparency, external reviews, and impact reporting. The document also highlights Panama's Sustainable Finance Taxonomy and the broader sustainable debt market trends in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The GCF Water Project Design Guidelines Part 3 outlines a framework for creating climate-resilient sanitation (CRS) projects. It details how climate hazards like flooding, sea-level rise, and drought impact sanitation infrastructure and services, and provides a scientific basis for both adaptation and mitigation. The guide advocates for a paradigm shift toward transformative sanitation planning, emphasizing circular economy principles—such as the recovery of water, nutrients, and energy—to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance community resilience. It provides specific technical interventions for the entire sanitation service chain and outlines the requirements for successful GCF funding proposals, including alignment with investment criteria and national climate strategies.

The Resilient Agriculture Innovations for Nature (RAIN) challenge, a partnership between the Global Resilience Partnership (GRP) and Munich Re Foundation, seeks nature-positive agricultural innovations in East Africa. Open to not-for-profit organisations, the challenge provides selected winners with tailored mentoring, a Leadership Academy, communications support, and potential next-stage funding for implementation and scaling. Applications are evaluated on a 100-point scale across criteria including innovativeness, impact, equity, scalability, viability, team composition, and risk.

The GCF Water Project Design Guidelines Part 1 establish a structured four-phase process—Scoping, Situation Analysis, Project Design, and Action Planning—to ensure water projects are climate-resilient and eligible for funding. The guide emphasizes an integrated systems approach, combining the Natural Resource System (NRS), Socio-Economic System (SES), and Administrative and Institutional System (AIS). A central requirement is the 'climate rationale,' which must use a 'climate science base' of historical and projected data to prove that projects address climate-induced risks rather than just general development needs. The guidelines advocate for adaptive management tools like Climate Risk Informed Decision Analysis (CRIDA) and Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways (DAPP) to handle uncertainty. Finally, the document links technical design steps to GCF's six investment criteria, including impact potential, paradigm shift potential, and country ownership, to ensure proposals are 'bankable' and aligned with National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).

The GCF Water Project Design Guidelines Part 2 outlines a structured approach to developing investment-oriented water projects that address climate change. It details the specific requirements and recommended measures for four key areas: Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM), Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), Drought Risk Management, and Flood Risk Management. The guide emphasizes the need for a strong climate science basis, the use of specific analytical tools, and the implementation of both 'grey' and 'green' infrastructure. Special attention is given to Small Island Developing States (SIDS), highlighting their unique vulnerabilities to sea-level rise and freshwater scarcity. The document also provides a framework for assessing project impact, paradigm shift potential, and sustainable development co-benefits to align with GCF's strategic goals.

The document outlines the role of Coal Transition Mechanisms (CTMs) in accelerating the shift from coal to clean energy, particularly in emerging markets. It highlights the challenge that 93% of coal capacity is shielded from market pressures by regulation or contracts, necessitating blended finance and CTMs to manage early retirement. To address reputational risks—such as the appearance of financing coal or failing to protect workers—the authors propose a framework focused on assessing moral hazard, ensuring Paris-aligned emissions savings, supporting just transition provisions, and maintaining transparency through public disclosures.

The document addresses the need for credible financing to accelerate the global transition from coal to clean energy, specifically focusing on coal transition mechanisms (CTMs). It highlights that while CTMs are essential because 93 percent of coal capacity is shielded from market pressures by regulation or contracts, they face significant reputational risks and constraints from private financial institution policies. To address this, the Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI), Climate Policy Initiative (CPI), and RMI have developed guidelines to ensure CTMs deliver positive climate and social outcomes, avoid moral hazard, and support a just transition for workers and communities.

WWF International outlines a framework for high-impact nature-based solutions (NbS) for climate mitigation, emphasizing that interventions must simultaneously benefit human well-being, biodiversity, and the climate. The report argues against narrowly designing projects for carbon credits, instead advocating for landscape-scale or jurisdictional approaches that align with national strategies and the Paris Agreement. It provides a hierarchy for forest-related interventions—prioritizing REDD, then improved forest management, and finally afforestation, reforestation, and restoration—and details essential safeguards, including free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) for Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs). To ensure integrity, the blueprint recommends rigorous due diligence to mitigate risks such as inflated baselines, leakage, and non-permanence.

The guide advocates for long-term commitment and deep engagement with Indigenous peoples over short-term, 'expeditivo' fieldwork to prevent exploitation and misrepresentation. It highlights the work of photographer Claudia Andujar with the Yanomami since 1971 and the documentation of the Standing Rock protests as examples of impactful, enduring storytelling that supports Indigenous rights and territorial defense.

The document advises media to move away from generic terms like "local" and instead promote a "real sense of place" by focusing on specific Indigenous Territories and the daily lives of their communities. It suggests using material and sensory details—such as a single tree or riverbank—to create familiarity and intimacy, rather than focusing on spectacular sights that cater to tourist expectations. The text emphasizes that photography in these contexts should be viewed as a relational act requiring permission from the "owners of the forest" and the spirits, reflecting the deep cosmological meanings associated with the land.

The document outlines the necessity of prioritizing the safety and well-being of Indigenous peoples when producing media content. It warns against 'parachute journalism' and emphasizes the need for constant communication with communities to avoid exposing them to risks through photography, recordings, or public disclosures. The guide advocates for respecting traditional authorities, recognizing legal land titles (Territories), and avoiding colonialist imagery that perpetuates discrimination.

This guide argues against the exoticization and generalization of Indigenous peoples and forests, urging media practitioners to move beyond 'white savior' narratives and 'pure' stereotypes. It emphasizes the importance of reflecting cultural adaptations, recognizing Indigenous presence outside of forests (such as in cities), and centering the voices of Indigenous individuals to protect their dignity and support their self-determination.

The document advocates for a 'slower and deeper' approach to storytelling and fieldwork when working with Indigenous communities, particularly in the context of forest preservation and climate change. It warns that prioritizing short-term gains increases the risk of misrepresentation. To illustrate the value of long-term commitment, it highlights the work of Claudia Andujar with the Yanomami in Brazil since 1971, whose sustained engagement led to the co-founding of the Pro-Yanomami Commission and the 1992 demarcation of their lands. It also references Josué Rivas's coverage of the Standing Rock protests and Pablo Albarenga's work with Sonia Guajajara to emphasize that meaningful imagery is a result of genuine human encounters rather than a primary goal.

The document advises media to avoid generic 'location' labels and tourist-centric 'spectacular sites' when depicting Indigenous lands. Instead, it advocates for imagery grounded in a community's familiar understanding of their land, focusing on everyday life and the material, sensory, and experiential details that convey deeper meaning and cosmology.

The Global Resilience Partnership (GRP), in collaboration with the UNDP and GEF, is seeking Expressions of Interest from organizations managing innovative finance mechanisms in fragile and conflict-prone regions. The initiative aims to support private sector solutions that address the 'triple threat' of COVID-19, climate change-induced extreme weather, and geopolitical instability. Selected organizations will receive grants, technical assistance from a multidisciplinary mentoring facility, and networking opportunities to improve the scale and effectiveness of their funds. Eligible mechanisms must be based in specific Least Developed Countries (LDCs), demonstrate a sustainable revenue model, and focus on the intersection of climate adaptation, food and water security, and disaster risk reduction.

The Alliance for Rural Electrification (ARE), in collaboration with AMDA, Smart Power India, and Swedfund, launched the Consumer Protection Principles for Clean Energy Mini-Grids in October 2019. These principles establish minimum standards of practice across six key areas: quality consumer care, supply quality and safety, fair contracting and billing, data privacy, professional organisation, and social measures. The framework allows mini-grid companies, investors, and governments to either 'endorse' the principles as a goal for alignment or 'commit' to them as an embodiment of their daily operations.

The guidelines establish a framework for the lifecycle of mining project rehabilitation and closure in Papua New Guinea, emphasizing early planning, stakeholder engagement, and the provision of financial assurance. It details the evolution of Rehabilitation and Mine Closure (RMC) Plans from the feasibility phase through to post-closure monitoring, outlining the requirements for physical and chemical stability and socioeconomic transition. The document specifies the contents of RMC Plans and the calculation and management of financial assurance to ensure that the state has sufficient funds to rehabilitate sites in the event of abandonment.

The document argues that active participation by under-represented groups, particularly women, is essential for creating just and sustainable climate adaptation policies. It emphasizes that positive change requires conscientious action rather than mere intention, as 'gender blind' processes often reinforce existing inequities. To achieve this, the brief provides a 'toolbox' of guidelines for SEI-US trainers divided into three phases: starting the conversation (e.g., ensuring diversity among trainers), creating an inclusive learning environment (e.g., selecting accessible locations and prioritizing sanitation), and monitoring and evaluation (e.g., measuring the quality, not just the quantity, of participation).