Search Climate Insights Directory

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) seeks to improve energy systems analysis to better characterize decarbonization pathways and their associated risks. Moving beyond traditional economic modeling, CATF advocates for an adaptive management approach that incorporates socio-political suitability, affordability, and environmental justice to ensure the feasibility of a zero-carbon energy system by midcentury.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) argues that Europe's current decarbonization plans are too limited in technological and policy options, focusing primarily on 2030 targets. CATF proposes a paradigm shift toward 'optionality,' advocating for a diversified clean energy portfolio that includes carbon capture and storage, zero-carbon fuels, and next-generation technologies like fusion and superhot rock energy. To implement this strategy, CATF seeks $35 million over three years to expand its capacity at the EU and member-state levels.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) is seeking $10 million over five years to implement a strategy for decarbonization in the Middle East. The initiative focuses on transitioning the region away from unabated fossil fuels, diversifying economies, and establishing a shared climate vision among Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. Key objectives include reducing methane emissions by 30 percent by 2030 and deploying technologies such as carbon management, zero-carbon fuels, and nuclear energy.

The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) identifies zero-carbon fuels like hydrogen and ammonia as essential for decarbonizing sectors where electrification is not commercially viable, such as aviation, maritime shipping, and ironmaking. CATF aims to overcome barriers including high costs, infrastructure gaps, and lack of policy support through a strategy that includes promoting hydrogen hubs, establishing clean fuel standards, and facilitating global trade. To implement these strategies over the next three years, CATF seeks $12 million in funding for capacity building, technical analysis, and support for first-mover projects.

The open letter calls for the immediate implementation of penalties under Article 23 of the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA) to enforce obligations on oil and gas producers to contribute to 50 million tonnes of annual CO2 injection capacity by 2030. Signatories argue that current efforts are insufficient and that credible enforcement is necessary to provide certainty for hard-to-abate industries, such as cement and lime production, which rely on carbon capture and storage (CCS) for deep decarbonisation.

The signatories argue that including rail, ship, barge, and truck transport for CO2 in the TEN-T regulation is essential for decarbonising industrial sectors and reducing investor risk.

The document calls for G20 leadership in the climate transition, noting that these economies produce 80% of global carbon emissions. It argues that climate action is essential for long-term economic prosperity, citing risks of GDP loss and the high cost of inaction compared to the cost of current investment. The authors urge G20 members to meet the March 2015 timeline for emission reduction commitments ahead of the Paris treaty.

A letter from the Refinery Manager’s Environmental Forum (RMEF) to the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs dated 23 September 2009, outlining industry concerns and proposed amendments regarding minimum emission standards for the petroleum sector under the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act.

A letter from the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) to various South African licensing authorities regarding the variation of Eskom's Atmospheric Emission Licences (AELs) following the granting of postponements for compliance with Minimum Emission Standards (MES).

The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER) has requested a meeting with the South African Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) to discuss the ongoing review of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002. The CER, acting on behalf of a strategy group of over ten non-governmental organisations, civil society groups, and academic institutions, aims to share expertise on environmental compliance, transparency, and accountability in mining to ensure draft legislation has greater civil society buy-in from an early stage.

The statement warns that adopting GWP* would allow the livestock industry to greenwash emissions and undermine the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C target. It recommends maintaining GWP100 or GWP20 for reporting and mitigation policies.

The letter argues that the current lack of controls on the global trade of waste plastic leads to 'global plastic dumping' in developing countries, exacerbating the marine debris crisis and harming public health. It specifically highlights how China's ban on plastic imports has shifted waste flows toward Southeast Asian countries that may lack the capacity for environmentally sound management. The authors request the removal of 'B3010: solid plastic wastes' from Annex IX and the addition of 'Y48: Solid plastic waste' (contaminated or mixed plastics) to Annex II to increase transparency and allow countries to make informed decisions about imports.

The document argues that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an ineffective and dangerous technology that serves the interests of polluters rather than the climate. It claims CCS is more expensive and energy-intensive than renewable alternatives, fails to significantly reduce CO2 emissions, and poses health and safety risks to frontline communities through increased toxic pollutants and pipeline hazards. The authors assert that nearly 80% of captured carbon is used for enhanced oil recovery and urge leaders in the US and Canada to shift public funding toward phasing out fossil fuels and investing in energy efficiency and natural carbon sinks.

The document asserts that the phaseout of fossil fuels is a legal requirement under customary international law, human rights law, the law of the sea, and climate treaties like the Paris Agreement. It argues that States must use all available means to prevent significant climate harm, including curbing fossil fuel production, licensing, and subsidies. The authors emphasize that developed States bear a higher burden of responsibility and must provide financial and technological support to developing nations for a just transition. Furthermore, the letter claims that climate obligations are 'erga omnes' and should take precedence over investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) claims.

The document presents a collection of statements from legal experts and policy advisors asserting that international law, supported by rulings from bodies such as the International Court of Justice, requires states to phase out fossil fuels to prevent climate harm and protect human rights.

The document asserts that the phase-out of fossil fuels is a legal requirement derived from customary international law, human rights law, environmental law, and the law of the sea. It emphasizes that states must employ all available means to prevent significant climate damage, prioritize emissions reduction at the source over speculative technologies, and ensure a just transition, particularly for the least developed countries and small island developing states. The authors argue that these obligations are 'erga omnes' and should prevail over investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms.

The document identifies the agricultural sector as a significant user of intentionally added microplastics, primarily through the application of plastic-coated synthetic fertilizers and pesticides marketed for 'controlled-release'. It argues that this practice increases microplastic pollution in soils and compounds the health and environmental risks of agrochemicals, calling for governments to close regulatory gaps and implement a comprehensive ban.

The document details the environmental and health impacts of the fossil fertilizer supply chain, noting that 58% of global production is powered by fossil fuels (primarily gas). It links these inputs to cancer, respiratory illness, and the creation of marine dead zones, while highlighting nitrous oxide as a potent greenhouse gas. The authors propose phasing out synthetic fertilizers in favor of agroecological practices to support a global population of 10 billion.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) has developed a Climate Risk Assessment Letter to help pension fund beneficiaries engage trustees on the management of climate-related financial risks. The guide argues that failing to monitor these risks—which include regulatory, technology, and litigation risks—may constitute a breach of fiduciary duty. It highlights that global financial institutions and some national funds, such as those in Norway and Ireland, are already reassessing or divesting from fossil fuel assets to protect long-term returns.

A coalition of 76 organisations calls for the European Union to implement a mandatory, digital, and transparent system for collecting pesticide use data. They argue that current proposals for the agriculture statistics regulation (SAIO) are insufficient, as they delay data collection until 2028 and lack necessary detail. The signatories demand that data collection begin by 2025, be mandatory, and be published by active substance, crop, and treated area to protect public health and biodiversity.