Search Climate Insights Directory

This fact sheet, published by the Institute for Economic Justice, SECTION27, and the Center for Economic and Social Rights, examines the South African government's obligation to use the 'maximum available resources' to protect social and economic rights during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contrasts the recommendations of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) with the government's actual fiscal responses, arguing that austerity measures and insufficient revenue mobilization have undermined the rights to healthcare, education, and social security.

This 2020 fact sheet by the Institute for Economic Justice examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on unemployment and labor precarity in South Africa. It analyzes the situation through the lens of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), specifically the rights to work and just conditions of employment, highlighting how the pandemic exacerbated existing systemic inequalities and the inadequacy of government relief measures.

This statement, published by the Institute for Economic Justice in 2020, calls on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to cease promoting austerity measures and instead adopt policies that prioritize gender justice, inequality reduction, and climate resilience in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

This report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) estimates the public funding required by 2030 to end hunger, double the incomes of smallholder farmers, and maintain agricultural greenhouse gas emissions within the limits of the Paris Agreement. Using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, the authors determine that donors must nearly double their current annual contributions to food security, supplemented by increased domestic tax revenue in low- and middle-income countries.

This report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) estimates the public investment required to eradicate hunger, double the incomes of small-scale producers, and maintain agricultural greenhouse gas emissions within Paris Agreement limits by 2030. Using a computable general equilibrium model, the authors determine that donors must increase their annual contributions by 14 billion USD, complemented by 19 billion USD from low- and middle-income countries, to achieve these goals.

This report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) estimates the public spending required to end hunger, double the incomes of small-scale producers, and maintain agricultural greenhouse gas emissions within Paris Agreement limits by 2030. It identifies a significant funding gap, requiring both an increase in official development assistance (ODA) and higher domestic taxation in low- and middle-income countries.

This executive summary, produced by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), argues for the urgent reform of World Trade Organization (WTO) rules regarding domestic agricultural support. The authors contend that current rules fail to limit the subsidies of major agricultural subsidizers and do not adequately address the growing support from emerging economies, hindering the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 2 (Zero Hunger). The document proposes simplifying domestic support rules, introducing new global limits based on production value, and establishing special treatment for developing countries.

This fact sheet evaluates Brazil's fossil fuel funding as part of a G20 scorecard, ranking it first among non-OECD G20 countries due to low support for coal and fossil fuel-based power, despite significant ongoing support for oil and gas production.

This fact sheet by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) evaluates Canada's fossil fuel funding as part of a G20 scorecard. It highlights that Canada provides significant public finance to oil and gas production, ranking worst among G20 OECD member countries on a per GDP basis, with total government support for fossil fuels averaging USD 14.3 billion between 2017 and 2019.

This fact sheet evaluates France's fossil fuel funding as part of a G20 scorecard for OECD member countries. While France ranks second among the 11 countries reviewed due to strong commitments and low support for fossil fuel production per unit of GDP, it continues to provide significant support for fossil fuel-based power and consumption.

This fact sheet by the International Institute for Sustainable Development evaluates Germany's fossil fuel funding, ranking it first among G20 OECD member countries with an overall score of 71/100. The document details government support across various fossil fuel sectors, highlights progress in reducing coal subsidies, and identifies remaining areas of high support, particularly in transport and industry.

This fact sheet provides a scorecard of fossil fuel funding in India, detailing government support through public finance, state-owned enterprise (SOE) investments, and consumer subsidies. It highlights a trend of increasing public finance and SOE investment despite some reductions in consumer subsidies for fuels.

This fact sheet by the International Institute for Sustainable Development evaluates Japan's funding of fossil fuels relative to other G20 OECD member countries, highlighting its role as a major public financier of overseas coal and liquefied natural gas projects despite some reductions in overall support.

This fact sheet from the International Institute for Sustainable Development evaluates Mexico's fossil fuel funding, ranking it last among G20 OECD member countries with an overall score of 48/100. The document details the scale of government support for fossil fuel production and use, the role of state-owned enterprises, and recent trends in subsidy reductions and increases.

This fact sheet provides a scorecard of government support for fossil fuels in Russia, analyzing funding levels, transparency, and progress in ending subsidies between 2017 and 2019.

This fact sheet evaluates the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's funding of fossil fuels, ranking it 8th (lowest) among G20 non-OECD member countries. The report highlights significant support through state-owned enterprise (SOE) investments and low energy prices, while noting a lack of transparency regarding direct budgetary transfers.

This fact sheet from the International Institute for Sustainable Development evaluates Turkey's fossil fuel funding, ranking it last among G20 OECD member countries with an overall score of 48/100. The document highlights high levels of support for coal production and fossil fuel consumption, while noting a decrease in state-owned enterprise investments.

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) outlines seven principles for a green recovery in Canada, focusing on net-zero commitments, social equity, and environmental regulation.

This executive summary outlines seven 'green strings'—principles and conditions—that the Canadian government should apply to COVID-19 recovery spending, bailouts, and stimulus to ensure alignment with climate goals and the transition to a low-carbon economy.

This executive summary by the International Institute for Sustainable Development outlines seven 'green conditions' that the Canadian government should apply to its economic recovery efforts following the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure alignment with climate goals and a transition to a low-carbon economy.