Search Climate Insights Directory

The paper argues that land in Indonesia is systematically undervalued because current assessments fail to comprehensively account for ecosystem services and lack integration with spatial planning and licensing processes. To address this, the authors propose a district-level natural capital assessment pilot, specifically recommending Kotawaringin Timur due to its high concentration of high conservation value areas under plantation status and its potential for low-emission oil palm productivity gains. The proposed methodology integrates Ministry of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 15/2012 and Ministry of Finance Regulation No. 98/PMK.06/2010, utilizing a combination of GIS, inventories, participatory approaches, and expert judgment to inform a 'Production and Protection' approach to land management.

The report introduces the FX Hedging Facility, a customizable currency hedging product designed to mobilize foreign investment for renewable energy in India. By splitting currency risk into a user-absorbed range (0-4.5% annual depreciation) and a donor-subsidized tail risk range (4.5% to P99.7), the facility aims to reduce hedging costs by approximately 30% compared to commercial cross-currency swaps. The instrument eliminates counterparty credit and liquidity risk premiums through upfront donor payments and offers an upside benefit if currency depreciation is lower than expected. Analysis suggests a leverage factor of approximately 9, with a greater than 50% probability that the donor subsidy will be fully recovered.

The report updates global climate finance data for 2013 and 2014, finding an annual average of USD 367 billion. It highlights the dominance of renewable energy and domestic investment, while noting a shift where developing countries began receiving more investment than developed countries in 2014. The document also identifies significant data gaps in adaptation and energy efficiency tracking.

The report provides a comprehensive overview of Brazil's rural land tenure system, tracing its history from colonial sesmarias to the 1988 Constitution. It highlights a fragmented system of multiple rural registries and cadastres that lack integration, which facilitates 'grilagem' (illegal land grabbing). The document details the specific regularization processes and obstacles for five key land categories: Indigenous Lands, quilombola territories, Conservation Units, agrarian reform settlements, and individual possessions on federal lands. It concludes by analyzing the complexities of implementing the 2012 Forest Code, particularly the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR), in the context of collective land tenure and overlapping territorial claims.

The assessment finds that 60% of Central Kalimantan's land area contains High Conservation Value (HCV) areas, with 62% of these areas threatened by development. The report identifies critical hotspots in five districts and highlights logging and spatial planning as primary drivers of forest loss, which declined by 32% between 1973 and 2012.

The report outlines a financing facility to address debt capital shortages for India's rooftop solar sector, specifically targeting commercial and industrial segments. It proposes a mechanism to bundle small projects into a warehouse line of credit, which is then refinanced via asset-backed securities (ABS) to attract institutional investors. The facility aims to lower debt costs by 0.5-3.5% and add 500MW of capacity by 2022.

Proterra addresses the high upfront cost and perceived technology risks of electric buses by selling the vehicles at the price of conventional diesel buses and utilizing a 12-year battery service agreement. This model shifts battery ownership and performance risk to Proterra, converting a capital expenditure into an operating cost funded by the lower operating expenses of electric buses.

This report analyzes the potential of the third party financing model to help India reach its target of 40 GW of rooftop solar power by 2022. It identifies high upfront costs, limited debt finance, and perceived performance risks as primary barriers, and proposes specific policy changes and financial instruments to scale the industry, particularly for commercial and industrial consumers.

The study finds that Resolution 3,545, implemented in 2008, led to a substantial reduction in deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, primarily by restricting access to rural credit for cattle ranching. Using a difference-in-differences approach and 2SLS estimation, the authors estimate that total deforested area from 2009 to 2011 was approximately 60% smaller than it would have been without the policy. The results indicate that cattle ranching is highly dependent on official credit and that credit constraints in the region lead to reduced expansion at the extensive margin. In contrast, crop-oriented municipalities showed no significant impact on deforestation, as crop production is less dependent on official rural credit and more focused on intensification.

The report analyzes the third party financing model for rooftop solar in India, where developers install and own systems and sell power to consumers via long-term agreements. While the model is financially viable in most states for industrial and commercial segments—often achieving grid parity without incentives—its growth is hindered by limited debt finance, consumer credit risk, and inconsistent net metering implementation. The report suggests policy interventions such as training bank officials, involving DISCOMs in power purchase agreements, and creating specialized dispute courts, alongside financial instruments like peer-to-peer lending platforms and green bond securitization.

The report argues that Brazil's insecure land rights hinder economic growth and environmental protection, specifically in rural areas where agriculture is a key GDP driver. It identifies five urgent consequences of this insecurity: land-related conflicts and violence, a lack of tenancy markets, increased deforestation, unconventional land use decisions, and production inequality for small farms. The document further outlines systemic governance challenges, including institutional complexity, limitations of the Land Registry, and the absence of an integrated database for public and private land.

The report argues that Brazil's insecure land rights lead to significant rural conflicts, deforestation, and economic inefficiencies. It highlights a systemic failure in land governance characterized by institutional complexity, unreliable registries, and the absence of an integrated database for public and private lands. These issues are exacerbated by the 'social function of property' requirement, which can incentivize land clearing to prove productivity and legitimize illegal land grabbing (grilagem).

The report argues that Brazil lags globally in property rights protection, leading to severe consequences including land-related violence, deforestation, and inefficient land use. It highlights a systemic failure in land governance characterized by institutional complexity, unreliable registration systems, and the absence of an integrated database for public and private lands. The document specifically notes that insecurity encourages deforestation as a means to prove land productivity to avoid expropriation and suppresses the land rental market due to legal and social distrust.

The document examines the surge of agricultural production in Brazil's MATOPIBA region, noting that expansion is heavily concentrated in the Cerrado biome. Between 1995 and 2012, Cerrado municipalities saw a 140% greater increase in agricultural production value than non-Cerrado areas, driven by cropland expansion and a shift from rice to soy. This boom led to an 11% higher increase in GDP per capita in Cerrado municipalities between 1999 and 2012, with gains in agricultural and services GDP, as well as improved access to electricity and durable consumer goods. However, the expansion did not significantly impact manufacturing GDP, population size, migration, or access to water and sewage.

The executive summary details how agricultural expansion in the MATOPIBA region, particularly within the Cerrado biome, has driven economic growth through increased grain production and higher per capita GDP, while having limited impact on social infrastructure and human capital.

The document reports that the expansion of sugarcane mills in Mato Grosso do Sul between 2005 and 2012 led to significant local economic growth, including a 30% GDP increase within three years of mill arrival. This growth was characterized by a shift in land use from cattle pastures to sugarcane, increased productivity in other crops like soybean and corn, and a reduction in average deforestation by 6.3 thousand hectares. The expansion also stimulated the labor market, increasing overall employment by 40% and expanding access to financial services and rural credit.

The study finds that the entry of sugarcane mills in Mato Grosso do Sul triggers significant local economic growth, including a 30% increase in municipal GDP and a 40% rise in employment three years after construction. While sugarcane expansion primarily displaces cattle pastureland, it creates positive productivity spillovers for soybean and corn crops. Additionally, the research indicates a decrease in deforestation in hosting municipalities, potentially due to increased environmental scrutiny and law enforcement associated with large-scale industrial investments.

The document argues that a general trend in Brazilian transport regulation seeks to reduce the economic profits of private concessionaires, which is being offset by hidden subsidies from the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES). This shift is claimed to erode incentives for private operators to select the most efficient projects and maintain high quality, thereby increasing costs for the agricultural sector. While highways and railways are seen as suffering from increasing regulatory complexity and unbundling, the port sector is highlighted as a relative success due to the deregulation of private usage terminals (TUPs), although the authors suggest further deregulation of public ports is needed.

The document identifies how shifting regulatory frameworks since the late 1990s have created market insecurity and discouraged private investment in Brazilian transport infrastructure. It highlights that current regulations often prevent long-term profits for concessionaires, leading to a reliance on public subsidies and a decline in service quality. Specifically, it notes that transporting soy in Brazil is nearly three times more expensive than in the US. The brief recommends realigning auction incentives for highways, returning to vertical integration for railways, and deregulating public ports to foster competition and efficiency.

The document examines how shifting regulatory environments in Brazil since the late 1990s have created market uncertainty and diminished the quality of transport infrastructure. It highlights that high transportation costs—such as soybean transport being nearly three times more expensive than in the U.S.—hinder agricultural productivity. The authors recommend realigning auction processes for highways, returning to a vertical integration framework for railways, and deregulating public ports to restore market incentives and improve infrastructure quality.