Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines a three-step process for NDC implementation: preparatory work, plan elaboration, and execution. It emphasizes a holistic approach across five key modules: governance, mitigation, adaptation, finance, and measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV). The guide stresses the importance of integrating climate actions into national development planning, ensuring gender sensitivity, and aligning with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The Climate Knowledge Brokers (CKB) Group, supported by a Coordination Hub at REEEP, operates as a community of practice for approximately 400 brokers across 60 countries. Between 2014 and 2017, the group focused on professionalizing the role of climate knowledge brokering through the 2015 Climate Knowledge Brokers Manifesto, peer-learning workshops, and the development of digital tools like Climate Tagger and Climate Search. The group emphasizes collaboration over competition to ensure decision-makers have access to tailored, high-quality climate information.

The report analyzes the legal distinctions between a protocol, another legal instrument, and an agreed outcome with legal force within the context of the UNFCCC. It distinguishes between 'legal force' (being part of international law) and 'legally binding' (having definite procedures and sanctions for non-compliance). The author argues that the legal character of the final agreement depends more on the prescriptive nature of its content and its enforcement mechanisms than on its formal legal designation.

The paper examines the application of probabilistic event attribution (PEA) to extreme weather in Africa, highlighting that different methodological framings—such as comparing single years versus decades—lead to significantly different risk quantifications. It argues that defining the 'right' attribution question is a stakeholder-driven process rather than a purely scientific one, which is critical for the effective implementation of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage. The authors emphasize that relying solely on predictable slow-onset events in loss and damage frameworks would exclude many vulnerable African communities affected by unpredictable extremes.

The study uses the Kestrel-Integrated Hydrological Model and CARIWIG climate data to project river flows in Saint Lucia's Font D’Or catchment. Results from two climate models, Echam5 and HADCM3Q0, generally predict a decrease in surface water availability, with the most severe reductions occurring in the HADCM3Q0 scenarios. These decreases, particularly during the rainy season, threaten water supplies for the tourism and agriculture sectors.

The paper examines how multilevel governance can facilitate climate change adaptation in Jamaica's coastal-marine environments. Using a case study approach and Social Network Analysis (SNA), the authors identify the roles of various state and non-state actors. Preliminary findings highlight the importance of bridging organizations, such as the Department of Fisheries (DoFish), and the potential of the newly established Climate Change Focal Point Network to strengthen horizontal coordination among government agencies. The study argues for the need to strengthen vertical ties between national and local levels and to leverage public-private partnerships to enhance adaptive capacity.

The Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) is currently empty, causing 29 climate adaptation projects to be put on hold with an urgent funding need of US$ 220 million as of June. The author, Giza Gaspar Martins, emphasizes that the LDCF is unique because it provides grant-based finance and equitable access to the 48 poorest countries, who often lack the capacity to compete for resources from larger funds like the Green Climate Fund (GCF). To make the fund 'fit for purpose,' the author proposes establishing a sustainable replenishment cycle, enabling alternative funding sources, and repositioning the LDCF as an 'incubator' to help LDCs scale up projects through larger finance mechanisms.

The document discusses the French government's use of a broad, multi-ministerial steering committee to prepare for COP21, emphasizing the need to integrate development and environmental agendas. It argues that breaking down institutional barriers between public and private finance, and between local and international scales, is essential for effective climate action and sustainable development.