Search Climate Insights Directory

The document outlines adaptation strategies for various climate-related health risks in Canada, including extreme temperature events, flooding, wildfires, food insecurity, vector-borne diseases, and water quality issues. It provides specific examples of municipal actions—such as Toronto's green roof bylaws and Vancouver's warming centres—and offers actionable tips for health professionals to support vulnerable patients and advocate for resilient community policies.

The document outlines how health professionals can leverage their status as trusted messengers to drive climate action. It suggests clinical approaches like motivational interviewing to encourage plant-based diets and active transport, and professional strategies such as integrating climate change into medical curricula. It also details advocacy methods, including using media to build public support and collaborating with other organizations to influence policy-makers, citing specific Canadian examples like the coal phase-out in Alberta and the promotion of plant-based proteins in Canada's Food Guide.

The document is a comprehensive guide for healthcare professionals to address climate change. It covers the science of climate change, its global and Canadian health impacts, greenhouse gas (GHG) emission trends in Canada, and practical solutions. It emphasizes 'co-benefits'—where climate actions like promoting plant-based diets or active transport immediately improve public health. The guide provides specific strategies for making healthcare facilities more resilient and sustainable, such as reducing the carbon footprint of anesthesia and supply chains, and offers a framework for community-level adaptation and professional advocacy.

The U.S. EPA has proposed a change in how it calculates the benefits of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for coal- and oil-fired power plants. By excluding 'co-benefits'—reductions in pollutants not directly targeted by the rule, such as particulate matter (PM2.5)—the EPA argues that the regulation is no longer 'appropriate and necessary' under the Clean Air Act. While the MATS originally prevented 11,000 premature deaths and 130,000 asthma attacks annually, removing co-benefits, which account for over 90% of monetized benefits, dramatically lowers the perceived value of the regulation relative to its compliance costs. Although the MATS remain in place for now, this methodological shift opens the door for the EPA to potentially rescind the standards or delist power plants as affected sources. Electric utilities have expressed concern over this shift, noting they have already invested over USD 18 billion in pollution-control upgrades. The report also notes that increased mercury emissions in the U.S. could adversely affect Canada due to transboundary transport.

The report examines local content policies (LCPs) in the mining sector, specifically focusing on local procurement. It details how 'local' is defined through geography, value addition, and ownership, and outlines various demand-side and supply-side policy options. The document emphasizes that for these policies to succeed, they must be supported by pre-conditions such as capacity analysis, a conducive business climate, and strong monitoring and enforcement mechanisms.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) submitted a brief to the City of Edmonton arguing that the current Integrated Pest Management (IPM) policy fails to adequately address human health risks. CAPE highlights that children are particularly vulnerable to pesticide exposure, which is linked to developmental deficits and childhood cancers, while adults face risks of Parkinson's disease and various cancers. The document criticizes Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) for relying on industry-supplied data and failing to conduct timely re-evaluations of registered pesticides. CAPE recommends that Edmonton formalize a policy to eliminate routine toxic pesticide use in city-managed parks and for mosquito control, and implement a bylaw restricting non-essential pesticide use on residential and private lawns.

The document argues that climate change is the greatest health threat of the 21st century, citing specific impacts on Canadians such as respiratory issues from wildfires, heat-related deaths in Quebec, and food insecurity in the Canadian Arctic. It calls for federal action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, phase out coal and fossil fuel subsidies, and invest in public health resilience and a just transition for workers.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and other health professionals argue that climate change is the greatest health threat of the 21st century, citing immediate impacts in Canada such as wildfires, heat-related deaths, and food insecurity in the Arctic. They urge federal parties to adopt targets to keep warming below 1.5°C, phase out coal by 2030, and reduce emissions from the oil, gas, and transport sectors, noting that such policies would yield significant health co-benefits and reduce healthcare costs.

The report outlines the value of natural infrastructure (NI) in Canada for climate adaptation, specifically for flood and drought mitigation. It identifies significant barriers in federal funding programs, such as the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) and the Disaster Mitigation and Adaptation Fund (DMAF), including high funding thresholds and restrictions on private land eligibility. The document explores innovative financing mechanisms like green bonds and insurance-linked resilience bonds, while emphasizing the need for natural asset accounting in public sector financial statements to incentivize municipal protection of NI.

The Grand River Environmental Network, the Ontario Headwaters Institute, and 24 other organizations are calling for the withdrawal of Schedule 10 of Bill 66. They argue that the legislation violates campaign promises to protect the Greenbelt and creates unnecessary municipal powers to identify employment lands despite a lack of shortage. The signatories claim the bill is "corrosive to environmental and public health" by exempting land from the Provincial Policy Statement and the Clean Water Act, potentially risking water safety and biodiversity. Furthermore, they assert that the bill "subverts democracy" by allowing municipalities to bypass official plans and deny public consultation and appeal rights.

The research analyzes six international water quality offset programs to determine how regulated dischargers can offset excess pollutant loads against reductions made elsewhere in a watershed. The study specifically aims to provide design and implementation lessons for Manitoba, where over 200 wastewater treatment facilities contribute to the eutrophication of Lake Winnipeg.

The report analyzes six water quality trading (WQT) and offset programs—including the Lake Simcoe Phosphorus Offsetting Program, the Lake Taupō nitrogen trading program, and the Tualatin River program—to derive lessons for Manitoba. It identifies that successful programs typically require a regulatory cap on pollutant discharges and significant variations in abatement costs between point sources (PS) and nonpoint sources (NPS). Key findings emphasize the importance of load-based rather than concentration-based regulations, the use of offset ratios to account for uncertainty and time lags, and the necessity of engaging agricultural producers through trusted intermediaries and simplified procedures. The report also highlights 'credit stacking,' where landowners receive multiple payments for combined benefits, such as nitrogen reduction and carbon sequestration, as a driver for program uptake.

CAPE submits that Calgary's current Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan is insufficient to protect residents from the health risks of toxic pesticides. The organization highlights specific vulnerabilities of children and adults, criticizes the federal PMRA regulatory process, and recommends a corporate ban on routine toxic pesticide use alongside a municipal bylaw for private properties.

The 2018 Lancet Countdown identifies extreme heat as the primary health concern globally, noting that 157 million more vulnerable people were exposed to heat waves in 2017 compared to 2000. In Canada, the report links air pollution from human activity to 7,142 premature deaths in 2015, with health impacts valued at $53.5 billion. The document advocates for carbon pricing, the phase-out of coal-fired power plants by 2030, and the integration of climate health into medical curricula.

A coalition of environmental and health organizations expresses grave concern over the reported plan to eliminate the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario (ECO) via Bill 57, arguing that the office's independent, evidence-based analysis is essential for environmental accountability and public health.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) calls on the Ontario government to implement a comprehensive climate plan to address increasing health risks from extreme weather. The organization identifies transportation (33%), buildings (22%), and industry (18%) as the primary sources of emissions in Ontario and proposes specific interventions for each sector, including transit electrification, building code updates, and clean energy grants. CAPE advocates for a long-term hard emission target aligned with the 1.5°C global warming limit, benchmark targets, annual progress reports, and five-year plan reviews.

The document details allegations that Monsanto engaged in ghostwriting scientific papers and coordinating with regulatory bodies to counter the International Agency for Research on Cancer's (IARC) 2015 designation of glyphosate as 'probably carcinogenic to humans'. It highlights specific instances where Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) relied on studies that were allegedly edited or co-written by Monsanto scientists without proper credit. Consequently, several environmental and health organizations have requested an independent review of the PMRA's 2017 decision to authorize the continued use of glyphosate in Canada.

The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) opposes Bill 4, which proposes repealing the Climate Change Mitigation and Low-carbon Economy Act, 2016. CAPE argues that Ontario's cap-and-trade program is essential for reducing emissions in the transportation (33%), buildings (22%), and industry (18%) sectors, and has collected $2.8 billion to fund public transit, electrification, and energy efficiency. The organization emphasizes that climate change is the "greatest public health threat of this century," citing recent extreme heat in Ontario and Quebec, as well as an increase in Ontario wildfires (1,312 in 2018 compared to a 10-year average of 716). CAPE recommends that if the government proceeds with the repeal, it must immediately implement a replacement plan that commits to reducing emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 to align with the 1.5 degrees C warming limit.

The report finds that Canadian municipalities can maintain acceptable weed control without toxic pesticides by shifting to cultural practices and mechanical methods, with stable budgets and supportive public attitudes.

The report finds that Canada's development has been unsustainable for significant periods since 2008, as comprehensive wealth declined or grew on a fragile basis despite GDP growth. Key vulnerabilities include stagnant per capita human capital, produced capital concentrated in housing and oil and gas, and the physical depletion of most market natural assets. While financial capital grew recently due to foreign stock market gains, household debt has reached unprecedented levels, increasing financial fragility.