Search Climate Insights Directory

The report analyzes the 'Global Europe' strategy as a political and economic tool used by the EU to secure access to raw materials, energy reserves, and open markets in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. It argues that 'Association Agreements' go beyond trade in goods to include the liberalization of services, investments, and government procurement, which the author claims undermines the sovereignty of developing nations. The document highlights specific negative impacts, such as the promotion of agrofuels in Central America, the pressure on African nations to sign Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) to maintain tariff preferences, and the role of European financial institutions like the European Investment Bank in funding extractive projects. It concludes that the strategy prioritizes corporate competitiveness over human rights and environmental sustainability.

The paper argues that resource rights—whether private or communal—are critical determinants of disaster vulnerability and recovery. In the pre-disaster phase, secure rights encourage investment in resilience and sustainable resource management, such as protecting mangrove buffers. Post-disaster, the loss of documentation and titleholders often delays reconstruction and compensation, potentially leading to opportunistic land grabs or social conflict. The authors emphasize that equitable re-allocation of resource rights is essential for restoring sustainable livelihoods and reducing long-term vulnerability.

A coalition of civil society organizations argues that the proposed appellate mechanism for CAFTA's investment chapter is flawed and could undermine public interest and democratic principles. They advocate for the retention of domestic court review, the creation of a standing appellate body rather than ad hoc tribunals, the inclusion of environmental law expertise among panelists, and the adoption of a de novo standard of review for legal conclusions. Additionally, they call for mechanisms to ensure developing countries can afford to participate in appellate proceedings.

The briefing examines the relationship between poverty and vulnerability to environmental stress, asserting that traditional income-based definitions of poverty are insufficient for guiding vulnerability reduction. It proposes a multidimensional framework encompassing economic, human, political, socio-cultural, and protective capabilities. The text explains how these dimensions interact with the three components of vulnerability—exposure, sensitivity, and resilience—and highlights how a lack of diverse assets and political marginalization increases the risk of chronic poverty and environmental degradation.

The report assesses the intersection of trade and sustainable development in Central American agriculture, focusing on the constraints imposed by the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and the potential for 'green' preferences. It provides detailed environmental impact matrices for key crops and livestock, highlighting a high reliance on agrochemicals and a lack of state incentives for sustainable conversion. The authors argue that while trade liberalization is a necessary condition, it is insufficient without comprehensive institutional investment, technological innovation, and a strategic shift toward sustainable production to ensure long-term rural development and environmental health.

The report analyzes the shift in US trade policy toward 'aggressive unilateralism' and bilateral FTAs as a means to open foreign markets and pressure the multilateral WTO process. It specifically examines the motivations and challenges surrounding the proposed US-SACU FTA, noting that while it offers an opportunity to lock in market access and build on the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), it faces hurdles regarding agricultural subsidies, intellectual property rights, and the disparate economic sizes of the partners. The authors warn that the FTA may not be a panacea for development if not coupled with broader structural policies.

The authors argue that CAFTA's investment chapter grants foreign investors greater substantive rights than U.S. investors, violating the Trade Act of 2002. They specifically criticize the lack of an appellate review mechanism, the absence of a general environmental exception, and the use of subjective standards like "fair and equitable treatment" which they claim could undermine democratic governance and environmental protections.

A coalition of environmental organizations urges the U.S. Congress to oppose CAFTA, asserting that its investor rules allow foreign companies to challenge environmental laws in international tribunals and that its environmental safeguards are insufficient to support sustainable development in Central America.

The report details Phase One (2001-2003) of a collaborative initiative to integrate disaster risk reduction, environmental management, and poverty reduction into climate adaptation. It argues that protecting natural services and enhancing sustainable livelihoods (SL) reduce the vulnerability of the poor to climate-related hazards. Through case studies and desk assessments in regions such as Sudan, Bolivia, and Vietnam, the project demonstrated that ecosystem management and restoration (EM&R) activities—such as watershed rehabilitation and mangrove reforestation—increase community resilience. The report provides lessons for field implementation and policy integration, specifically suggesting entry points for these micro-scale activities within UNFCCC processes like National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs) and the UNDP Adaptation Policy Framework (APF).

A formal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by Friends of the Earth – U.S. and other environmental organizations to the United States Trade Representative for documents concerning investment provisions in various U.S. free trade agreements.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), along with Friends of the Earth – US, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Defenders of Wildlife, submitted a FOIA request to the USTR for all environmental provisions and supporting documents of free trade agreements negotiated since early 2003, specifically mentioning agreements with Morocco, Colombia, Australia, and Central America.

Tropical hillside communities in Latin America, Africa, and Asia are highly vulnerable to soil erosion and deforestation, which are exacerbated by climate change. The PASOLAC program in Nicaragua, Honduras, and El Salvador demonstrates that Sustainable Soil and Water Management (SSWM) techniques—such as agroforestry, organic fertilization, and the construction of dams—increase resilience to droughts and heavy rainfall. Key outcomes include improved soil water retention, reduced topsoil loss, and the restoration of year-round water flows. The document argues that integrating human-based approaches, financial instruments like payments for environmental services, and market access is essential for long-term adaptation and livelihood security.

The 19th SAC meeting focused on approving 22 proposals for the second round of the Small Grants Program (SGP-II) and designing the second round of Core Research Networks (CRN-II). The committee recommended a budget split of 80% for CRNs and 20% for smaller grants and training. Additionally, the SAC discussed the need for a full-time Program Coordinator and the implementation of Summer Institutes to address climate vulnerability and land-use change in the Americas.

The 19th SAC meeting focused on evaluating the second round of the Small Grant Program (SGP-II), recommending 22 proposals for funding from a pool of 86. The committee discussed the closure of the first round of Collaborative Research Networks (CRNs) and established guidelines for a second round of CRNs to be launched in 2004, including a budget of up to US$200K per project and a requirement for participation from at least four IAI member countries. Additionally, the SAC reviewed the implementation of three Summer Institutes focused on land use in the Amazon, climate vulnerability in Central America and the Caribbean, and global climate change causes and mitigation.

The document analyzes the intersection of trade, agriculture, and sustainable development in Central America. It highlights a growing trade deficit driven by commercial openness and a reliance on low-value generic exports. Environmentally, the region faces significant water and air pollution due to the intensification of agrochemicals and livestock production. The report argues that while Central American countries have significant room under WTO rules to implement 'Green Box' support measures for sustainable agriculture, they currently lack the fiscal resources and institutional coordination to do so effectively.

The report analyzes the agricultural sector in Central America, noting a trend where imports grow faster than exports and a heavy reliance on external technology for dynamic crops. It identifies significant environmental degradation caused by the high use of pesticides in banana and cantaloupe production and carbon emissions from sugar cane burning. The authors argue that while the region has extensive environmental legislation, it is rarely enforced. To promote sustainable development, the document recommends establishing non-distorting support mechanisms, negotiating special treatment for 'sustainable' products in trade agreements like CAFTA and the FTAA, and creating a General System of Green Preferences (SIGPREVERDE) for developing countries.

The Center for International Environmental Law and other signatories argue that the U.S.-Chile and U.S.-Singapore FTAs undermine environmental protection through flawed investment rules and weak environmental provisions. They specifically highlight the failure to meet the 'no greater rights' standard for foreign investors, the absence of a citizen submission process, and the lack of an independent environmental cooperation institution, contrasting these agreements unfavorably with the U.S.-Jordan FTA and NAFTA.

Over sixty civil society organizations have called on President George Bush to extend the deadline for the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) negotiations to allow for meaningful public participation and transparency. The organizations argue that current negotiations exclude civil society representatives outside the business sector and that the failure to publish negotiating texts hinders democratic input. They specifically express concern that labor issues will be addressed in May 2003 without input from Central American labor unions, and highlight potential threats to agriculture, sustainable development, worker rights, and access to medicines.

The report provides a geospatial analysis of the world's drylands, which cover approximately 40 percent of the global land area and support over two billion people. It evaluates the provision of ecosystem services including forage for livestock, food production, biodiversity conservation, freshwater, carbon storage, and energy. The analysis highlights that while drylands are often perceived as unproductive, they are critical for human survival, though they face significant threats from soil degradation, water scarcity, and human activities such as overgrazing and urbanization.

The author argues that while the end of the Cold War initially saw a rise in local conflicts, the overall trend is moving toward a more peaceful world. This optimism is grounded in the observed decline in the number of armed conflicts since the late 1990s and the positive influence of global trends such as poverty reduction, democratization, and the rise of international military interventions for conflict settlement. The analysis highlights that internal conflicts (civil wars) are the dominant form of violence and are most strongly linked to poverty, though the author distinguishes between 'greed' and 'grievance' motivations. The document also notes that while ethnic polarization and resource scarcity are often cited as causes of war, systematic evidence is often ambiguous or secondary to broader economic and political factors.