Search Climate Insights Directory

The report argues that the EU ETS has failed to provide a sufficient carbon price signal for low-carbon investment due to a massive surplus of allowances caused by the recession and complementary energy policies. It proposes a triad of measures: setting aside allowances to recalibrate the market, implementing a rising reserve price on auctions to create a price floor, and accelerating negotiations for 2030 climate goals.

The report argues that governments can leverage their significant purchasing power to transform industry growth into green growth by incentivizing investment in sustainable products and services. It details various frameworks for innovation—ranging from reactive to transformative—and provides global case studies from countries like Denmark, Brazil, China, India, Australia, and Vietnam to demonstrate the practical application of GPP. Key recommendations include the adoption of life cycle costing, the use of performance-based specifications, and the integration of sustainability criteria into electronic business systems to move beyond a focus on the lowest initial purchase price.

The document examines how community protocols and FPIC processes empower indigenous and local communities to protect their land, resources, and traditional knowledge. Through various case studies in countries such as India, Peru, Ghana, and Cameroon, it argues that these tools are most effective when they are bottom-up processes designed and controlled by the communities themselves rather than imposed top-down by governments or corporations. The report highlights the role of the Nagoya Protocol and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in providing international legal support for these tools, while noting that national implementation often remains inadequate.

China is transitioning from top-down command-and-control energy policies to market-based instruments, aiming for a national carbon trading system by 2016. While the country has been a global leader in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), its domestic market remains in a research-and-development stage. Current efforts focus on seven regional pilots and potential sector-based schemes for power and buildings. Significant hurdles remain, including the lack of reliable baseline emission data, the absence of a mature free-market economy, and the need for a legal infrastructure to manage permit allocation and verification.

The report assesses China's ambition to launch a national carbon trading system by 2015, noting that while the government is determined to move away from inefficient top-down administrative measures, a functional domestic market does not yet exist beyond the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). It highlights the initiation of seven regional pilots (Beijing, Chongqing, Guangdong, Hunan, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Tianjin) as critical experiments that will determine the future of Chinese climate policy. The authors identify significant hurdles, including a lack of reliable emission data, the absence of a mature free-market economy, and the need for robust legal frameworks for monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV).

The document asserts that the notion of replacing mitigation with adaptation to meet temperature targets is unrealistic because adaptation has absolute limits and varies by scale and region. It critiques integrated assessment models (IAMs) for underestimating climate damages and overestimating adaptation effectiveness due to flawed assumptions about rational behavior and optimal timing. The authors suggest that policy-makers should instead use risk-based frameworks and co-benefits analyses to maximize the combined benefits of both strategies.

The Living Planet Report 2012 documents a significant global decline in biodiversity and a state of 'ecological overshoot,' where human consumption exceeds the Earth's regenerative capacity. It highlights the disproportionate impact of high-income countries on natural resources and proposes a framework for preserving natural capital through better production, wiser consumption, and equitable governance.

The 2011-2012 CDKN Partner Survey reveals high satisfaction with the network's information products, particularly its publications and newsletter, with higher approval ratings from partners in the South. While over 83% of respondents found CDKN effective at facilitating knowledge sharing, there were significant criticisms regarding its procurement processes and the administrative burden placed on partners, especially smaller organisations and individual consultants. Partners suggested a greater focus on grassroots support in developing countries and the creation of more practical, field-based partnerships.

The document addresses the historical lack of transparency in investor-state arbitrations, noting that this opacity often results from treaties being silent on confidentiality. It highlights a growing trend where states are inserting specific transparency provisions into their treaties to increase public access to information. The text focuses on the approaches of specific nations including Canada, the United States, Chile, Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand, as well as regional agreements like NAFTA and COMESA.

The report critiques the Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP), a bilateral agreement between Australia and Indonesia designed to pilot REDD carbon offsets. It argues that the project ignores indigenous land rights, fails to address the primary drivers of deforestation, and risks creating social conflict. The document further contends that market-based REDD mechanisms generally shift climate responsibility from rich to poor nations and are prone to 'leakage' and permanence issues.

This report by Friends of the Earth International highlights the 'ecological war' waged by extractive industries, detailing the deaths and repression of activists in countries such as Nigeria, the Philippines, and Colombia. It argues that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a myth used to mask systemic abuses and calls for an end to fossil fuel addiction and the protection of indigenous territories.

The document examines how unilateral carbon pricing creates production cost variations that may lead to 'carbon leakage'—the relocation of production to regions with less stringent environmental standards. It analyzes policy mechanisms to mitigate these risks, such as free allowances and Border Carbon Adjustments (BCAs), while highlighting the industry's strategic role in providing essential materials for low-carbon infrastructure. The brief argues that because the mining and metals sector is emissions-intensive and trade-exposed, policy design must account for specific commodity characteristics and long investment cycles to avoid jeopardizing economic viability and environmental integrity.

The document argues that GHG offsets are a critical component of effective climate policy, providing flexibility for regulated industrial emitters and expanding emission reductions to non-regulated sectors. Through a review of international and domestic systems and original CIMS modelling, the brief demonstrates that offsets can significantly lower the societal cost of carbon policies. It proposes two primary implementation paths: integrating offsets as a compliance mechanism within sector-by-sector regulations or establishing a separate, independent offset regime to cover sectors like agriculture and waste.

The document argues that integrating offsets into Canada's GHG regulations can significantly lower compliance costs for industrial emitters and expand emission reductions to difficult-to-regulate sectors like agriculture and forestry. It highlights that offsets are not exclusive to cap-and-trade systems but can complement performance standards, as seen in jurisdictions like Alberta and New South Wales. Modelling suggests that unlimited access to domestic offsets could reduce costs for industrial emitters by up to 40% and nearly double total emission reductions when expanding coverage. The brief proposes two implementation paths: allowing offsets for direct compliance within sector regulations or establishing a separate, independent carbon management fund.

The report finds a robust consensus across four analyzed studies that developing country mitigation pledges are greater in absolute terms than those of developed countries. It argues that developed country pledges are insufficient and could be further eroded by lenient accounting rules regarding land use and surplus allowances. The analysis concludes that current global pledges are consistent with temperature rises between 2°C and 5°C, necessitating higher ambition from developed nations based on principles of equity and historical responsibility.

The research paper examines the stalled Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) negotiations between the EU and the SADC, highlighting that the Trade Cooperation and Development Agreement (TDCA) already liberalises most trade between South Africa and the EU. It identifies agricultural market access and the EU's demand for the protection of geographical indications (GIs) as the primary remaining points of contention. The author argues that because South Africa refuses to negotiate on services, investment, and competition policy, concessions on agriculture may be the only way to reach a deal, which could potentially undermine the Southern African Customs Union's common external tariff if a final agreement is not reached by 1 January 2014.

The document examines the rise of public-private partnerships (PPPs) as a mechanism for funding public infrastructure and services. While acknowledging benefits such as private sector expertise and off-budget funding, it highlights significant drawbacks, including higher long-term costs, reduced transparency, and a lack of sustainability criteria. The author argues that PPPs have not yet delivered on their potential for long-term sustainability and suggests that they should be redesigned to stimulate green growth and embed environmental and social safeguards across their entire life cycle.

The analysis indicates that South Africa is vulnerable to border carbon adjustments (BCAs) from the US and EU, with potential annual charges of €380 million and US$210 million respectively. The non-ferrous metals and iron and steel sectors are the most exposed, facing ad valorem tax equivalents exceeding 10%. To mitigate these risks, the document suggests South Africa could pursue WTO redress or negotiate sectoral emissions reduction agreements to gain exemptions.

The report analyzes EGS programs in the UK, Australia, France, Switzerland, the US, and Canada, emphasizing the shift from regulatory approaches to economic incentives. It highlights the importance of multifunctionality, geographic targeting, and public accountability. For Manitoba, it recommends a consolidated, watershed-based approach incorporating performance measurement and adaptive management.

The case study details the struggle of the Amadiba Crisis Committee to challenge mining rights granted to Transworld Energy and Mineral Resources. It highlights failures in community consultation, the absence of adequate environmental assessments, and the tension between a government-backed mining strategy and a community-preferred ecotourism model. The text also critiques the use of a Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) partner, XolCo, which the community claims is not representative.