Summary

AI-generated

This summary is written by a language model reading the source document. It is not the publisher's words and is not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment

The 2011-2012 CDKN Partner Survey reveals high satisfaction with the network's information products, particularly its publications and newsletter, with higher approval ratings from partners in the South. While over 83% of respondents found CDKN effective at facilitating knowledge sharing, there were significant criticisms regarding its procurement processes and the administrative burden placed on partners, especially smaller organisations and individual consultants. Partners suggested a greater focus on grassroots support in developing countries and the creation of more practical, field-based partnerships.

Key insights

AI-generated

These insights are written by a language model reading the source document. They are not the publisher's words and are not a substitute for the original.

Learn more about AI enrichment
  • CDKN's information products received high approval ratings, with publications and policy briefs being the most highly rated at 88%, followed by the newsletter at 84% and the website at over 80%.
  • Partners based in the South generally rated CDKN's services and products more highly than those in the North, with an 88% approval rating for the website, newsletter, and publications.
  • CDKN is perceived as highly effective in knowledge sharing, with over 83% of respondents agreeing, a figure that rises to 91% among those based in the South.
  • While 74% of respondents viewed CDKN as effective at facilitating partnerships, there is a sharp divide between Southern respondents (83%) and Northern respondents (56%).
  • CDKN's influence is strongest regarding organisations' ideas, visibility, and networks, but it is seen as having relatively less impact on capacity, practices, and policies.
  • Individual consultants and members of the Roster of Experts expressed more dissatisfaction than NGOs and research institutes, particularly regarding procurement systems and the perceived bias toward larger organisations.
  • Respondents identified a need for CDKN to increase support for grassroots practitioners and organisations in the South, emphasizing the integration of indigenous knowledge and practical field-level application.

Cite the original document

APA
Climate and Development Knowledge Network (2011). Annual Partner Survey 2011-2012. https://cdkn.org/sites/default/files/files/Annual-Partner-Survey-2012-RESULTS.pdf
Chicago
Climate and Development Knowledge Network. Annual Partner Survey 2011-2012. 2011. https://cdkn.org/sites/default/files/files/Annual-Partner-Survey-2012-RESULTS.pdf.
Wikipedia
{{cite report |author=Climate and Development Knowledge Network |title=Annual Partner Survey 2011-2012 |date=21 December 2011 |url=https://cdkn.org/sites/default/files/files/Annual-Partner-Survey-2012-RESULTS.pdf |access-date=17 August 2026 |via=Climate Insights Directory}}
BibTeX
@techreport{climateanddevelopmentknowledgenetwork2011annual, author = {{Climate and Development Knowledge Network}}, title = {{Annual Partner Survey 2011-2012}}, institution = {Climate and Development Knowledge Network}, year = {2011}, month = dec, url = {https://cdkn.org/sites/default/files/files/Annual-Partner-Survey-2012-RESULTS.pdf}, urldate = {2026-08-17}, note = {Indexed by Climate Insights Directory} }

Full text

Collected · Record updated