Search Climate Insights Directory

The document examines the environmental benefits and risks of pulse production in Canada, focusing on the information systems that track these impacts from the farm to the federal level. It highlights the role of nitrogen-fixing pulses in reducing synthetic fertilizer use and the shift toward conservation tillage to combat soil erosion. The analysis identifies a gap between informal, farm-level observations and formal, aggregated government data, noting that proprietary soil-testing data and political boundaries between provinces hinder a fully integrated information infrastructure.

The report finds that GE crops increased overall pesticide use by 318.4 million pounds between 1996 and 2008. While Bt crops reduced insecticide use by 64.2 million pounds, herbicide-tolerant (HT) crops increased herbicide use by 382.6 million pounds, primarily driven by HT soybeans. The author attributes this trend to the emergence of glyphosate-resistant weeds and the industry's shift toward 'stacked' traits, which the report argues will further increase pesticide volumes and environmental risks.

The document analyzes the conflict dynamics of the Tuareg in North Africa and the Sahel, arguing that the violence is rooted in the loss of traditional livelihood resources and systemic political exclusion. It examines how post-independence land reforms, severe droughts in the 1970s and 1980s, and the industrial exploitation of uranium and gold have marginalized the Tuareg. The paper details the specific trajectories of conflict in Mali and Niger, the assimilation policies in Algeria, and the destabilizing role of Libya. It concludes that peace requires a comprehensive approach addressing the root causes of poverty and resource inequality rather than treating the Tuareg as terrorists.

The document asserts that GM crops fail to address hunger because food insecurity is driven by poverty rather than production deficits. It claims that most GM crops are used for animal feed and biofuels in wealthy nations, with production concentrated in the US, Argentina, and Brazil. The text argues that GM crops do not increase yields and instead lead to higher pesticide use and the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds. It highlights the financial gain of companies like Monsanto through a "trait penetration" strategy that raises seed and herbicide prices, while small farmers face escalating costs and rural unemployment.

This report by Friends of the Earth International examines the socio-economic and environmental impacts of GM crops, specifically focusing on the dominance of a few corporations like Monsanto. It argues that GM technology does not solve hunger, as most crops are used for animal feed or biofuels in wealthy nations. The document highlights a trend of increasing pesticide use and the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds in the US, Argentina, and Brazil. It further claims that GM crops often result in lower yields than conventional varieties and suggests that agroecological and organic farming are more effective alternatives for food security.

The document examines the hydropolitics of the Nile Basin, focusing on the tensions between upstream states, particularly Ethiopia, and downstream states, Egypt and Sudan. It argues that colonial-era agreements and Egypt's pursuit of 'prior appropriation' rights have created an inequitable distribution of water, hindering development in upper riparian states. The author suggests that cooperation through frameworks like the Nile Basin Initiative and the adoption of the Helsinki Rules for equitable sharing are necessary to avoid future conflict and ensure food and energy security.

The study identifies common extreme weather events in Southern Alberta, including the 2001 drought, 2002 flooding, and 2007 extreme heat. It analyzes short-term coping mechanisms, such as water diversion and crop insurance, and long-term adaptation strategies, including no-till farming, crop rotation, and technological upgrades. The report also highlights non-weather stresses like the BSE crisis and rising input costs, while noting a general dissatisfaction with government programs like CAIS.

This fact sheet by Friends of the Earth International contends that GM crops, primarily soya, maize, and cotton, fail to increase yields or reduce poverty in developing regions. It asserts that the GM model benefits large-scale industrial farmers through 'convenience' while harming small-scale farmers via high seed costs, land displacement, and increased pesticide use. The document specifically highlights negative outcomes in South America, Africa, India, and China, and disputes claims that GM technology makes food cheaper or is necessary for the livestock industry.

The report argues that GM crops, particularly herbicide-tolerant varieties, have not increased yields and have instead led to an increase in pesticide use due to the emergence of resistant 'superweeds'. It highlights the monopolization of the seed market by a few agrochemical giants, specifically Monsanto, and documents negative socio-economic impacts on small farmers in India, South Africa, and South America, including increased debt and land displacement.

The report argues that GM crops, particularly herbicide-tolerant (HT) and Bt varieties, have failed to deliver promised benefits in yield and poverty reduction. It documents a significant increase in pesticide use and the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds in the US, Argentina, and Brazil. The document further highlights the monopolization of the seed market by a few firms, specifically Monsanto, and the resulting economic pressure and legal harassment of farmers. Case studies in India, China, and South Africa suggest that yield increases are often due to weather or irrigation rather than GM technology, while small farmers face increased debt and vulnerability.

The document examines how trade liberalization and increased market access in the EU, US, and ASEAN could grow Lao PDR's organic agriculture sector. While it identifies benefits such as the prevention of chemical pollution and the potential for Foreign Direct Investment to bring sustainable technology, it warns that increased production scale could lead to deforestation and protected area encroachment. A critical barrier identified is the lack of domestic organic certification and quality assurance systems, leaving producers dependent on expensive international bodies. The paper recommends that the Government of Lao PDR establish national certification, organize farmers' groups, and draft laws aligned with international standards to ensure sustainable growth.

The document investigates the export potential of Lao silk and mulberry products, noting that while there is a growing international market for 'green products', the industry faces risks of deforestation and water pollution. It highlights that Laos has a significant land area of mountains (80-85%) and that sustainable production requires strict adherence to environmental standards, such as ISO 14,000, to access niche markets. The paper suggests that the government's Industrial and Handicraft Development Strategy towards 2020 provides a framework for growth, but emphasizes the need for a robust certification system to prevent environmental degradation.

The report assesses the first decade of GM crop commercialization, focusing on soy, maize, cotton, and rapeseed. It argues that the promised benefits—such as increased yields and reduced pesticide use—are largely myths. In the US, it notes that GM crops have not increased potential yields and have actually increased overall agrochemical use. In South America, specifically Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay, the expansion of GM soy is linked to deforestation and increased pesticide use, with GM varieties showing higher susceptibility to drought than conventional ones. In Asia and Africa, the report highlights the failure of Bt cotton in China, India, and Indonesia, citing the emergence of secondary pests and increased farmer indebtedness. It concludes that the primary beneficiary of this technology is Monsanto, which has consolidated control over the global seed market, while small farmers face increased dependency and economic risk.

The report argues that transitioning from conventional confinement systems to pasture-based production for pigs, chickens, and eggs reduces environmental pollution and improves animal welfare. While it notes that non-ruminants cannot derive as many nutritional benefits from grass as cattle do, it highlights that pasture systems lower production costs for farmers and reduce public health risks associated with antibiotics and arsenic. The document identifies challenges such as seasonality and the need for hardier breeds, while calling for clearer labeling standards and increased technical assistance for producers.

The report examines the 'commodity price problem,' characterized by extreme short-term volatility and a steady long-term decline in real prices relative to manufactured goods. While high prices can provide windfall revenues, the authors argue that dependence on primary commodities creates a 'resource trap' that undermines fiscal planning, exacerbates social inequality, and encourages environmental degradation. The document concludes that because developing countries lack the resources to hedge against these risks, the international community should focus on income stabilization through mechanisms such as compensatory financing, national revenue management, and risk management instruments.

The report argues that China's pursuit of high GDP growth has led to severe environmental degradation, which in turn triggers internal security risks such as violent protests and mass migration. Internationally, China's need to secure energy, water, and timber resources drives an assertive foreign policy, leading to territorial disputes and the 'export' of environmental degradation to trading partners. The document highlights critical scarcity in water and energy, deteriorating air quality contributing to the 'Asian Brown Cloud', and the impact of domestic logging bans on international timber trade.

The report finds that pasture-raised beef and milk generally contain lower total fat and higher levels of beneficial fatty acids, such as omega-3s and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), compared to conventional products. It argues that shifting toward pasture-based systems would improve human nutrition, animal welfare, and environmental quality while reducing antibiotic resistance.

The report asserts that ten years after the first major GM crop plantings in 1996, these technologies have not reduced hunger or poverty and have instead increased pesticide use and corporate control over seeds. It highlights the dominance of Monsanto, Syngenta, and Bayer, noting that over 95% of commercial GM plants are limited to maize, soy, and cotton. The text details failures in various regions, including poor yields of GM sweet potatoes in Kenya and farmer debt in India, while accusing Monsanto of using corruption in Indonesia and aggressive legal tactics against farmers in the US.

The report critiques the 'agro-business revolution' of GM crops, specifically targeting Monsanto's influence on global agricultural policies and the misleading data provided by the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA). It argues that GM crops have led to increased pesticide use, land concentration, and the erosion of farmers' rights through restrictive intellectual property regimes. The document concludes that the primary beneficiaries of this technology are biotechnology companies, while small-scale farmers and the environment suffer negative impacts.

The report establishes a four-stage 'Impact Pathway' approach—comprising pathway constituent, transport, impact, and valuation models—to quantify environmental externalities in Canadian agriculture. Testing this framework on five indicators (water erosion, phosphorus contamination, GHG emissions, energy efficiency, and wildlife habitat) reveals that while valuation methods are generally well-established, significant data and methodological gaps exist in 'transport modelling' for water-related indicators. The report suggests that watershed-level analysis is the most effective unit for these valuations and proposes integrating these findings into macro-level economic models like CRAM and LUAM.