Search Climate Insights Directory

The report argues that China's transition to a low-carbon economy requires significant funding, estimated at RMB2 trillion annually, which can be partially met by growing a green bonds market. It recommends establishing a 'Green Bond Market Development Committee' to create China-specific green definitions based on the CBRC's Green Credit Reporting Instruction and a government-approved supervisory entity for third-party verification. Policy recommendations include providing corporate tax credits for interest on green bonds, establishing partial credit guarantees for green municipal and PPP project bonds, and expanding R-QFII and QFII quotas specifically for green investments. The report emphasizes that green bonds should be earmarked for specific projects rather than entity-level credentials to maximize market scale and transparency.

The document argues that green project bonds can provide a viable alternative to traditional bank lending for green infrastructure PPPs, especially in the wake of Basel III regulations. It details the characteristics of project bonds, the risks involved—such as construction risk and negative carry—and the necessity of credit enhancements to achieve investment-grade ratings. The paper also provides guidance for public procurers on integrating bond financing into tender processes and highlights the growing global market for climate-themed bonds.

This fact sheet highlights the high cost of transporting grain in Brazil compared to the United States, citing the BR-163 highway and the Porto de Santos as key examples of infrastructure and cost inefficiencies. It advocates for regulatory reforms in public ports and the replacement of implicit subsidies with more attractive long-term private investment frameworks to improve transport quality and reduce costs.

The handbook defines Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP) as a process to optimize value-for-money across an asset's lifecycle, rather than focusing solely on the lowest purchase price. It provides a framework for integrating sustainability into every stage of the procurement cycle—from needs analysis and market consultations to technical specifications and contract conditions. The document details specific mandatory and optional criteria for high-spend categories such as IT equipment, vehicles, and infrastructure, while emphasizing the use of the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) principle. It also outlines strategies to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the potential for SPP to act as a catalyst for inclusive green growth and foreign direct investment.

The manual defines Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP) as a process to maximize value for money over a product's life cycle, reducing environmental and social harm. It provides a structured framework for integrating sustainability into the procurement cycle—from needs analysis and market consultation to contract management—and offers specific technical criteria for common public expenditures such as ICT equipment, vehicles, lighting, paper, air conditioning, furniture, and textiles. The document also explores the 'multiplier effects' of SPP, including its ability to attract foreign direct investment, stimulate innovation, and support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Additionally, it details various Public-Private Partnership (PPP) structures and provides guidelines for 'green roads' and sustainable buildings.

The document analyzes Russia's extensive but fragmented system of development institutions, noting a lack of common strategy and a heavy reliance on government funding over private investment. It identifies the Vnesheconombank (VEB) as the primary institution, though it often duplicates the roles of others like the Russian Agricultural Bank and Rusnano. The author argues that the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) could complement this system by investing in infrastructure projects, such as the Power of Siberia gas pipeline, and providing consultancy on public-private partnerships and foreign investment legal structures.

The briefing argues that a compelling business case for large-scale adaptation investment in LDCs has not yet been established because most adaptation needs function as public goods with little financial return for investors. It introduces a framework analyzing the interaction between enabling environments, mobilization, and delivery, noting that even when private finance is mobilized, it may not reach priority sectors or could lead to maladaptation. The author concludes that private sector contributions to adaptation finance are likely to be limited and suggests exploring alternative pathways such as domestic SME incentives, improved tax collection, microfinance, and reduced remittance costs.

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) argues that while the Arctic possesses vast renewable energy reserves and successful technology tests, adoption remains slow. To accelerate this transition, the IISD proposes clear long-term targets, the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies—specifically subsidized diesel—and the establishment of public-private partnerships funded by environmental taxes.

The Eden District Municipality (EDM) is seeking a private partner for a 10-year PPP to develop, finance, and operate a regional landfill in the Mossel Bay area to serve Bitou, George, Knysna, and Mossel Bay. The project includes the bulk transfer of waste from George, Knysna, and Bitou, and the implementation of alternative waste treatment (AWT) technologies to reduce landfill volumes. The regional landfill is designed for a 50-year lifetime, with initial cells covering 200 ha and reaching 12m above ground level. Bidders must demonstrate technical and financial capacity, including a minimum of 70 points on a technical evaluation scale, and provide proof of B-BBEE compliance and tax clearance.

The report identifies geothermal energy as a cost-competitive, low-carbon baseload power source, but notes that its deployment is hindered by high resource risks and long development timelines. It finds that 76-90% of geothermal project investments rely on public debt or equity, as the private sector is generally unwilling to fund the high-risk exploration phase. The document argues that while current policy support often focuses on the operational phase, public finance should be redirected toward the early stages of project development to attract more private capital.

The document argues that while engaging the private sector in post-conflict settings carries reputational and political risks, it is essential for sustainable economic recovery. It suggests that SADPA should move beyond a purely militaristic or diplomatic approach to PCRD by coordinating with businesses to create jobs and stimulate growth. The author proposes six specific modalities for engagement, including risk guarantees, governance reform, and the creation of public-private dialogue platforms, while cautioning against a purely mercantilist approach that could damage South Africa's image in Africa.

The paper argues that for the SDGs to deliver climate compatible development, climate change must be both a stand-alone goal and mainstreamed across all other goals. It highlights a lack of quantitative targets in the Open Working Group's draft and emphasizes the need for nationally relevant indicators and local-level resilience. The document suggests that the SDGs should complement the UNFCCC process rather than duplicate it, and calls for coordinated financing to avoid gaps in climate compatible development funding.

The report explores diverse strategies to advance international climate policy, including the adoption of a 'green growth' narrative, the application of social psychology to fairness and equity, and the use of 'clubs' or public-private technology pools to bypass traditional negotiation impasses. It specifically examines the legal interpretation of 'common but differentiated responsibilities' (CBDR), the potential of green bonds to mobilize private finance, and the 'Quisqueya Platform' for creating synergies between mitigation and adaptation in developing countries.

The document explores diverse strategies to advance international climate policy, including the adoption of a 'green growth' narrative, the application of social psychology to fairness and equity disputes, and the use of 'clubs' or public-private technology pools to bypass traditional negotiation impasses. It specifically examines the legal interpretation of 'common but differentiated responsibilities' (CBDR), the potential of green bonds to mobilize private finance, and the 'Quisqueya Platform' for creating synergies between mitigation and adaptation in developing countries.

The paper examines the multi-level nature of resilience in WASH systems—at regional, urban, and individual levels—to identify strategies for public-private partnerships. It argues that businesses must integrate ecosystem health into investment decisions to mitigate climate-related risks like floods and droughts. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for an institutional culture focused on greener urban environments and partnerships that support vulnerable populations through micro-finance and the inclusion of informal entrepreneurs.

The report examines the financing of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs), emphasizing the need to move beyond reliance on international public funding toward leveraging private capital. It defines 'bankability' as the attractiveness of a project to investors based on its revenue-generating potential and provides a framework for designing such projects. Through eight case studies from countries including Morocco, Tunisia, and the Philippines, the document illustrates the roles of public-private partnerships (PPPs), the importance of implementing bodies (such as Special Purpose Vehicles), and the necessity of risk mitigation tools like partial credit guarantees and power purchase agreements. The report concludes with recommendations for NAMA developers to engage the private sector early in the design process and for international stakeholders to disseminate best practices in private funding.

The 'Water for Our Future' event, hosted by the World Water Council, WWF, and The Coca-Cola Company, focused on three themes: Green Growth, Water Stewardship and Industry; Water for Food; and Enough Safe Water for All. The forum emphasized the necessity of 'multisector partnerships' and a shift from short-term water projects to long-term water services. Key discussions highlighted the undervaluation of water in the US, the critical role of farmers in water stewardship, and the need for inclusive planning that incorporates local communities and women. The report also presents case studies on the 'golden triangle' partnership in the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo basin and a public-private partnership for wastewater treatment in Jordan.

The report evaluates a ZAR 1.1 billion education programme by Anglo American Platinum in South Africa's Limpopo and North West provinces. Using a mix of qualitative field visits and quasi-experimental methods, the study finds that while individual learners benefited from specific interventions, the overall programme had no statistically significant positive impact on school-level National Senior Certificate (NSC) pass rates. Crucially, the research identifies a 'proximity to mine' effect, where schools located within 50 km of platinum mines actually show a negative correlation with mathematics and science pass rates, potentially due to high learner enrolment in technical subjects without adequate resources. The study concludes that the small positive effects of corporate social investments were outweighed by the negative externalities of the mining operations themselves.

The guide argues that effective mainstreaming of disaster risk management (DRM) requires a supportive policy environment, strong leadership, risk knowledge, consistent financing, and innovation. It identifies key barriers, such as the compartmentalisation of DRM, climate change, and development into separate policy streams, and the lack of technical capacity for risk assessment. The document proposes solutions including strategic inter-ministerial coordination, the use of 'data-light' risk assessment methods, and the creation of political incentives by demonstrating the economic returns of risk-informed investments. It emphasizes that mainstreaming is a political process requiring inclusive partnerships and the navigation of vested interests to protect development gains from climate-related disasters.

The guide argues that effective mainstreaming of disaster risk management (DRM) requires a supportive policy environment, strong leadership, accurate risk knowledge, consistent financing, and innovation. It highlights that DRM is often compartmentalised from climate change and sectoral development, leading to 'risk-blind' decisions. The document proposes overcoming these barriers through strategic inter-ministerial coordination, the use of cost-benefit analyses to prove the economic value of risk-informed planning, and the engagement of the private sector. It emphasizes that mainstreaming is a political process that requires inclusive, multi-stakeholder platforms and visionary leadership to navigate vested interests and institutional inertia.