Search Climate Insights Directory

The Belém Declaration, signed by city and regional governments, NGOs, and other stakeholders, urges national governments to establish National Action Plans For Plant-Based Foods. The document argues that transitioning to plant-rich diets is a critical lever for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, protecting biodiversity, and improving public health. It specifically calls for these plans to be tabled for discussion at COP32 in 2027 and for the use of agrifood promotion budgets to fund their implementation.

The document advocates for a land-use framework in the post-2020 climate agreement based on four principles: rights, ambition, equity, and biodiversity. It warns that treating terrestrial carbon sequestration as fungible with fossil fuel emissions undermines climate ambition and risks human rights violations. The authors recommend separate targets for industrial and land-based emissions, the protection of tenure rights for indigenous peoples and local communities, and a per capita allocation of agricultural emissions to ensure global food security.

The document outlines the Climate Bonds Standard's framework for certifying green bonds in Brazil's agricultural sector, detailing the pre-issuance, issuance, and post-issuance steps. It specifies eligible agricultural projects—categorized by production units, interventions, and support activities—and lists the screening indicators required for mitigation and adaptation. The guide highlights Brazil's potential as a major agricultural producer and provides case studies of certified instruments, such as those from Rizoma Agro, Solinftec, and Produzindo Certo.

The document details the Climate Bonds Initiative's (CBI) voluntary labelling scheme designed to align agricultural debt instruments with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement. It provides a three-step certification process (pre-issuance, issuance, and post-issuance) and defines eligible agriculture projects across three categories: whole production units, interventions within production units (mitigation and adaptation), and supporting activities. The guide highlights Brazil as a key market, noting that while land use is the second largest green bond category there, crop-specific issuance is growing, citing three certified cases: Rizoma Agro, Solinftec, and Produzindo Certo.

The document provides a framework for Brazilian livestock producers to issue certified green bonds aligned with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Climate Agreement. It details a three-step issuance process—pre-issuance, issuance, and post-issuance—and defines eligible projects across three routes: whole production units, specific unit interventions, and supporting activities outside the farm. To achieve certification, issuers must meet specific screening indicators, including no land conversion since 2010 and demonstrated low-carbon animal management. The guide highlights Brazil's significant role as a global livestock producer and the potential for green bonds to reduce methane emissions, which account for nearly 65% of the country's agricultural emissions.

The document outlines the Climate Bonds Standard and Certification Scheme to align livestock investments with the 1.5ºC global warming limit. It details a three-step process for certification—pre-issuance, issuance, and post-issuance—and defines eligible livestock projects across three routes: whole production units, on-farm interventions, and off-farm activities. The guide emphasizes the potential for green bonds to decarbonize the Brazilian livestock sector, which is one of the world's largest producers of beef, pork, and poultry.

The document examines the technical, environmental, and economic drawbacks of using hydrogen as a primary energy carrier. It highlights extreme energy losses across the value chain, where total system efficiency is only 20-30%, and notes that over 98% of current hydrogen is produced from fossil fuels. The text warns that 'hydrogen-ready' infrastructure risks locking in fossil fuel dependence and diverting resources from more efficient direct electrification. Environmental concerns include high water and land footprints for green hydrogen, as well as the indirect warming effect of hydrogen leaks. The author concludes that low-carbon hydrogen should be reserved for chemical feedstocks and niche industrial applications where direct electricity is not feasible.

The Minerals and Mining Policy of Ghana outlines a strategic framework to balance mineral exploitation with sustainable economic, social, and environmental development. It details the transition from state-controlled mining (1957-1983) to a privatized sector, emphasizing the need to diversify the mineral base beyond gold, diamonds, manganese, and bauxite. The policy sets objectives to enhance local value addition, improve geo-scientific data, and support artisanal and small-scale mining, which is reserved for Ghanaian citizens. It establishes regulatory roles for agencies like the Minerals Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency, while committing to international climate goals, including the UNFCCC. Fiscal policies aim for a transparent regime that balances investor attraction with the optimization of government revenue, while social policies focus on community participation, sustainable livelihoods for displaced persons, and the prevention of child labour.

The document distinguishes between 'safe bets'—commercially available solutions with few constraints—and 'wild cards'—solutions with uncertain prospects. It asserts that safe bets will drive most reductions by 2030, while wild cards will increase in importance by 2050.

The document distinguishes between 'safe bets'—technologies available commercially without major implementation constraints—and 'risky bets'—solutions with uncertain prospects that could still be significant for carbon neutrality. It notes that safe bets provide the majority of reductions by 2030, while risky bets increase in importance by 2050.

The document outlines three distinct net-zero energy system pathways for Canada: a fossil fuel system reliant on negative emissions, a biofuel-dominant system, and an electrification and hydrogen-based system. It identifies internal factors within Canada's control, such as domestic policy and infrastructure, and external factors like global market trends and technological innovation that will influence the evolution of these systems. Each pathway is analyzed through its specific upsides, downsides, and implementation barriers, ranging from the risk of delaying structural economic change in fossil fuel systems to the massive land-use footprints required for biofuels and electrification.

The document evaluates three potential energy systems for Canada's transition to carbon neutrality: one based on fossil fuels with negative emissions, one based on second-generation biofuels, and one based on electrification and hydrogen. It identifies that while Canada possesses assets like land and infrastructure, the choice of system depends on factors such as technological viability, social justice, and international market trends.

The report details the proceedings of the 4th GCPC, highlighting the critical need for a science-policy interface amidst rising political populism. It identifies governance and finance as primary cross-cutting challenges, while also examining specific policy contexts including urban adaptation, land-use coordination, trade regulations, and the social dimensions of energy transitions.

The report details the proceedings of the 4th GCPC, highlighting the critical need for a science-policy interface amidst rising populism and funding cuts. It identifies governance and finance as overarching challenges, while specifically examining urban adaptation, land use coordination, trade regulations under WTO norms, and the necessity of a just energy transition in the Global South.

The report details the proceedings of the 4th GCPC, highlighting the critical need for a science-policy interface amidst rising populism and funding cuts. It identifies governance and finance as overarching challenges, while specifically examining urban adaptation, land use coordination, trade regulations under WTO rules, and the necessity of a 'just transition' in the energy sector. The document emphasizes the role of regional networks and institutional experimentation in overcoming climate inertia.

The report details a workshop in Panama aimed at moving Just Transition from dialogue to implementation. It presents case studies from the Dominican Republic, Spain, and Brazil, and synthesizes group discussions on creating a Just Transition taxonomy, defining monitoring indicators, and establishing core guiding principles to support developing countries and the COP30 presidency.

The document outlines the structure of COP28, including its constituent meetings (COP28, CMA5, CMP18, SBI 59, and SBSTA 59) and the three main goals of the Paris Agreement: limiting temperature rise to 1.5°C, adapting to climate change, and aligning finance flows. It details the thematic program from November 30 to December 12, 2023, the role of the Youth Climate Champion, and the significance of the first-ever Global Stocktake, which found the world is far from achieving Paris Agreement goals. The text also describes the distinction between the Blue Zone for negotiations and the Green Zone for public engagement.

The document analyzes a shift in Amazon deforestation from large-scale to small-scale clearings between the mid-2000s and early 2010s. It finds that while conservation policies introduced in 2004 successfully reduced large-scale deforestation, they created a technical gap where clearings of 25 hectares or less go mostly undetected. Using data from Mato Grosso and Pará, the research shows that landholders have adapted their practices to elude monitoring, with smallholders in Pará emerging as primary agents of clearing. The brief recommends enhancing remote sensing technology and tailoring policies to local regional characteristics.

Between 2004 and 2012, the annual deforestation rate in the Brazilian Amazon fell from 27,000 km² to 4,500 km², but the composition of this deforestation shifted. While large-scale clearing decreased due to public policies, deforestation in small clearings (under 25 hectares) grew from representing one-quarter of the total in 2004 to more than half by 2012. The document highlights that current satellite monitoring systems cannot detect clearings smaller than 25 hectares, allowing many actors—particularly small landowners in Pará and medium-to-large landowners in Mato Grosso—to evade detection. The authors recommend tailoring policies to regional differences and improving remote sensing technology to detect small-scale deforestation.

The Climate Policy Initiative identifies three fiscal opportunities for Indonesia to encourage productive and efficient land use to meet its COP Paris emission reduction target of 29% by 2030. First, it recommends shifting the tax burden from profit-based levies to land-area-based levies, noting that 93.5% (400 trillion Rupiah) of current land-sector revenue comes from production and profit, providing no incentive for efficiency. Second, it suggests reforming revenue transfers to local governments to remove incentives for land expansion, such as changing the Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH) to favor VAT over land and building taxes (PBB). Third, it proposes earmarking the Adjustment Fund (Dana Penyesuaian), which grew from 20 trillion Rupiah in 2010 to 56 trillion Rupiah in 2011 but currently funds no sustainable land management programs. A case study on the palm oil sector reveals a low tax-to-GDP ratio of approximately 3.4% and that only 11-14% (1.103 trillion rupiah) of its revenue was shared with local governments in 2012/2013.