Search Climate Insights Directory

The document offers a structured approach for LDCs and SIDS to develop INDCs, emphasizing that these countries may use strategies, plans, or specific projects rather than absolute emission reductions. It provides templates for mitigation (action-based or result-based), adaptation, planning processes, and means of implementation, while highlighting the importance of transparency, national circumstances, and the pursuit of co-benefits such as poverty reduction and energy access.

The World Resources Institute provides a comprehensive list of information elements that Parties may include in their INDCs to improve transparency. Based on the Lima Call for Climate Action and Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards, the guide details requirements for reference points, implementation timeframes, scope, planning processes, methodological assumptions, and justifications for fairness and ambition.

The document outlines a comprehensive list of information elements for Parties to include in their INDCs, focusing on quantifiable data regarding baselines, timeframes, scope, planning processes, and methodological assumptions. It specifically details requirements for greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting, the use of international market mechanisms, and the treatment of the land sector. Additionally, it suggests indicators for demonstrating the fairness and ambition of contributions in relation to national circumstances and the goals of the Convention.

The paper examines the conflict between bioenergy production and the global need for food, feed, and carbon sequestration. It argues that dedicated land use for bioenergy—including crop-based biofuels and cellulosic energy crops—exacerbates a projected 70 percent crop calorie gap by 2050. The authors contend that bioenergy is an inefficient use of solar radiation compared to solar photovoltaics (PV), which can produce over 100 times more energy per hectare. Furthermore, the document identifies a systemic 'double counting' error in greenhouse gas accounting that erroneously treats biomass as carbon-free. It recommends phasing out subsidies and mandates for land-dedicated bioenergy while prioritizing 'additional' biomass sources such as municipal waste and specific residues.

The paper identifies four types of double counting—double issuance, double claiming, double use, and double purpose—and argues that preventing these is essential for the integrity of international carbon markets. It recommends a 'net flows' accounting approach to ensure full fungibility of units and the international linking of emissions trading schemes. To prevent double issuance, the authors suggest a combination of entity attestations, host country approval, and a centralized UNFCCC information platform. The document emphasizes that globally unique serial numbers containing detailed metadata on mechanism, country, vintage, and scope are critical for effective international oversight.

The document introduces the CaRROT toolkit, an MS Excel-based tool for Kenya's flower industry to account for GHG emissions, energy, and water consumption. It outlines the assessment methodology based on ISO, IPCC, and GHG Protocol standards, and identifies climate-related business opportunities such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and voluntary carbon markets. The report recommends establishing sectoral baselines and enhancing capacity building to transition the industry toward a low-carbon model.

The Beijing Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) reduced CO2 emissions by 4.87 MtCO2 cumulatively between 2013 and 2015, contributing to an earlier emissions peak for the city. The majority of these reductions (98% of power-related cuts) were driven by demand-end management, where companies reduced electricity consumption to meet emission caps, while reductions from power plants within Beijing were negligible. Carbon offsets had no observable impact on allowance prices in the 2014 cycle due to limited supply, particularly of Beijing-originated offsets. The study suggests that a future national ETS should consider including indirect emissions from electricity consumption and implement more stringent caps on direct electricity production to be effective.

The paper examines the potential for international offsets to provide a net decrease in global GHG emissions, distinguishing between 'surplus reductions' (actual abatement exceeding credits issued) and 'net atmospheric benefit' (reductions beyond country pledges). It argues that achieving a net benefit requires high confidence in additionality, the implementation of measures like pre-issuance discounts or stringent baselines, and accounting rules that prevent double-counting. Analysis of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) suggests that industrial gas projects (HFC-23 and N2O) are the most promising candidates for yielding a net decrease, potentially providing 80 to 100 million tonnes CO2e in 2020, provided host countries do not count these reductions toward their own pledges.

The document discusses the ongoing negotiations in Bonn regarding the FVA and NMM, highlighting the need for standards that ensure real, permanent, and verified mitigation outcomes while avoiding double counting. Carbon Market Watch proposes specific governance and accounting measures to secure net atmospheric benefits and uphold human rights.

The document argues that the New Market Mechanism (NMM) and the Framework for Various Approaches (FVA) require a binding international governance structure to prevent double counting and ensure net atmospheric benefits. It identifies three types of double counting—unit type, double claiming, and overlapping mitigation/financial contributions—and calls for a common international transaction tracking mechanism. The author emphasizes that credits must be tied to the upholding of international human rights law and sustainable development indicators to avoid the failures observed under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).

The paper assesses the technical parameters used to calculate emission reductions for improved cookstoves, specifically focusing on biomass fuel consumption, the fraction of non-renewable biomass, and emission factors. It identifies significant uncertainties in current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Gold Standard methodologies, noting that reliance on laboratory tests like the Water Boiling Test often fails to reflect real-world performance. The authors argue that current accounting may under-credit projects by ignoring non-CO2 gases and black carbon, and by using fossil fuel emission factors as surrogates for biomass. The document recommends incorporating uncertainty accounting, refining monitoring through data loggers, and developing more localized, sub-national assessments for non-renewable biomass.

The Stockholm Environment Institute is launching a project to analyze the 'new fossil fuel economy,' specifically focusing on how new investments in extraction and trade infrastructure create political and economic dependencies that hinder climate stabilization. The initiative aims to develop new GHG accounting frameworks from a supply perspective, assess equity considerations for supplying countries, and evaluate the social and environmental impacts of unconventional oil, gas, and coal development. Planned case studies include coal infrastructure for Asian markets in Mongolia and Mozambique, oil shale in Estonia, Jordan, Morocco, and the Western U.S., and oil sands in Venezuela's Orinoco basin.

The document examines how international offsets can provide a net atmospheric benefit by generating 'surplus reductions'—where actual emission reductions exceed the credits issued. It identifies key requirements for this to occur, including certain additionality, the avoidance of double-counting, and the use of accounting procedures that prevent surplus reductions from counting toward a host country's pledge. The brief analyzes the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), suggesting that industrial gas projects (HFC-23 and N2O) are particularly suited for discounts due to low marginal costs. It estimates that applying significant discounts to these project types could yield 111 to 136 million tonnes CO2e in surplus reductions by 2020, with a potential net atmospheric benefit of 80 to 100 million tonnes CO2e depending on host country pledge accounting.

The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) argues that traditional cookstove projects often fail because they focus on installation numbers rather than sustainable market transformation. SEI advocates for a user-centered design approach, combining qualitative ethnographic data with quantitative choice experiments to understand the social, cultural, and economic drivers of energy decisions. The briefing highlights the need for business models that enable local replication and examines the role of carbon finance and innovative fuel sources, such as ethanol micro distilleries in Ethiopia, to reduce reliance on biomass.

The paper examines the 'mitigation timing question' for bioenergy, specifically how the time-frame used to calculate carbon payback affects whether bioenergy is seen as a greenhouse gas reduction or increase. The author critiques several existing approaches—including those by O'Hare et al. and Cherubini et al.—for failing to account for emissions trajectories and the disproportionate value of immediate mitigation. The author contends that once a goal of immediate mitigation is adopted, future reductions must be discounted due to the time value of money, technological progress, and the 'option value' of delaying specific commitments. The author suggests a minimum discount rate of 5% per year, which mathematically aligns with a 20-year payback period, similar to the approach used by the European Commission.

The analysis finds that while Boulder has achieved significant energy savings, current programs are insufficient to meet its 2012 Kyoto-based emissions targets. Residential lighting programs and audits are the most cost-effective, while renewable energy systems show below-average returns. The report recommends transitioning to a longer-term, integrated approach focusing on deep retrofits and exploring municipalization of the energy supply to close the emissions gap.

The report assesses China's ambition to launch a national carbon trading system by 2015, noting that while the government is determined to move away from inefficient top-down administrative measures, a functional domestic market does not yet exist beyond the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). It highlights the initiation of seven regional pilots (Beijing, Chongqing, Guangdong, Hunan, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Tianjin) as critical experiments that will determine the future of Chinese climate policy. The authors identify significant hurdles, including a lack of reliable emission data, the absence of a mature free-market economy, and the need for robust legal frameworks for monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV).

The report identifies a significant gap in the ability to measure the effectiveness of climate finance, noting that current tools are often project-based, incompatible, and lack real-time evaluation capabilities. It argues that effectiveness is enhanced when funding is aligned with national priorities, promotes transformative effects, and utilizes results-based approaches. The authors recommend the development of standardized 'climate effectiveness' metrics, robust ex ante and ex post abatement estimates, and increased transparency to avoid the risks of fragmentation and 'crowding-out' of private investment. The analysis draws on lessons from development aid (Paris-Accra principles), international financial institutions (IFIs), and market-based instruments like the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).

The report examines the role of US forests and forest products in mitigating climate change, emphasizing that a rational policy must look beyond simple sequestration to include the carbon storage and substitution benefits of harvested wood. It analyzes forest carbon stocks and flows, the impact of climate-driven disturbances like wildfire and pests, and the life-cycle carbon benefits of using wood instead of steel or concrete. The authors critique the high transaction costs and measurement uncertainties of project-based carbon offsets, suggesting alternative policies such as information disclosure and updated building codes to promote the use of sustainable forest products.

The document argues that carbon markets offer indigenous communities opportunities for economic development aligned with sustainable forest management, provided that governments ensure free, prior and informed consent and protect land and carbon rights. It highlights a global lack of effort to involve indigenous peoples in carbon market policy and notes a specific information void regarding First Nations in Canada.